e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13397
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
22-3514823 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois
|
|
60154 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code (708) 551-2600 |
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
(currently traded with Common Stock) |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
|
|
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Note Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Registrants voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant (based upon the per share closing price of $23.76 on June 30, 2005, and, for the purpose
of this calculation only, the assumption that all of the Registrants directors and executive
officers are affiliates) was approximately $1,740,052,000.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock, par value $.01 per share,
as of February 28, 2006, was 73,972,032.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Information required by Part I (Items 1 and 2), Part II (Items 5, 6, 7, 7A and 8) and Part IV (Item
15(a)(1)) of this document is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13.1 included as part of this
2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this document is incorporated by
reference to certain portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement distributed in
connection with its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company
Corn Products International, Inc., was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1997 and its
common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Corn Products International, Inc., together
with its subsidiaries (the Company or Corn Products), manufactures and sells a number of
ingredients to a wide variety of food and industrial customers.
The Company is a leading regional producer of starches, liquid sweeteners and other
ingredients around the world. It is one of the worlds largest corn refiners and is the leading
corn refiner in South America.
The Company had consolidated net sales of $2.36 billion in 2005. Approximately 60 percent of
the Companys 2005 revenues were provided from its North American operations, with the remainder
coming from its South America and Asia/Africa operations.
The Companys products are derived primarily from the processing of corn and other
starch-based materials, such as tapioca. Corn refining is a capital-intensive, two-step process
that involves the wet milling and processing of corn. During the front-end process, corn is
steeped in a water-based solution and separated into starch and other co-products such as animal
feed and germ. The starch is then either dried for sale or further processed to make sweeteners
and other ingredients that serve the particular needs of various industries.
The Companys sweetener products include high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), glucose corn
syrups, high maltose corn syrups, caramel color, dextrose, maltodextrins and glucose and corn syrup
solids. The Companys starch-based products include both industrial and food-grade starches.
The Company supplies a broad range of customers in many diverse industries around the world,
including the food and beverage, pharmaceutical, paper products, corrugated, laminated paper,
textile and brewing industries, as well as the global animal feed markets.
The Company believes its local approach to production and service, which focuses on local
management and control of its worldwide operations, is of high value to its customers.
Products
Sweetener Products. The Companys sweetener products represented approximately 53 percent, 52
percent and 54 percent of the Companys net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
High Fructose Corn Syrup: The Company primarily produces two types of high
fructose corn syrup: (i) HFCS-55, which is mainly used as a sweetener in soft drinks; and
(ii) HFCS-42, which is used as a sweetener in various consumer products such as
fruit-flavored beverages, yeast-raised breads, rolls, dough, ready-to-eat cakes, yogurt and
ice cream.
Glucose Corn Syrups: Corn syrups are fundamental ingredients widely used in
food products such as baked goods, snack foods, beverages, canned fruits, condiments, candy
and other sweets, dairy products, ice cream, jams and jellies, prepared mixes and table
syrups. In many markets, the Company offers corn syrups that are manufactured through an ion
exchange process, a method that creates the highest quality, purest corn syrups.
2
High Maltose Corn Syrup: This special type of glucose syrup has a unique
carbohydrate profile, making it ideal for use as a source of fermentable sugars in brewing
beers. High maltose corn syrups are also used in the production of confections, canning and
some other food processing applications.
Dextrose: The Company was granted the first US patent for dextrose in 1923. The
Company currently produces dextrose products that are grouped in three different categories
monohydrate, anhydrous and specialty. Monohydrate dextrose is used across the food
industry in many of the same products as glucose corn syrups, especially in confectionery
applications. Anhydrous dextrose is used to make solutions for intravenous injection and
other pharmaceutical applications, as well as some specialty food applications. Specialty
dextrose products are used in a wide range of applications, from confectionery tableting to
dry mixes to carriers for high intensity sweeteners. Dextrose also has a wide range of
industrial applications, including use in wall board and production of biodegradable
surfactants (surface agents), humectants (moisture agents), and as the base for fermentation
products including vitamins, organic acids, amino acids and alcohol.
Maltodextrins and Glucose and Corn Syrup Solids: These products have
a multitude of food applications, including formulations where liquid corn syrups cannot be
used. Maltodextrins are resistant to browning, provide excellent solubility, have a low
hydroscopicity (do not retain moisture), and are ideal for their carrier/bulking properties.
Corn syrup solids have a bland flavor, remain clear in solution, and are easy to handle and
also provide bluing properties.
Starch Products. Starch products represented approximately 23 percent, 22 percent and 21
percent of the Companys net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Starches are an important
component in a wide range of processed foods, where they are used particularly as a thickener and
binder. Cornstarch is also sold to cornstarch packers for sale to consumers. Starches are also used
in paper production to produce a smooth surface for printed communications and to improve strength
in todays recycled papers. In the corrugating industry, starches are used to produce high quality
adhesives for the production of shipping containers, display board and other corrugated
applications. The textile industry has successfully used starches for over a century to provide
size and finishes for manufactured products. Industrial starches are used in the production of
construction materials, adhesives, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, as well as in mining, water
filtration and oil and gas drilling.
Co-Products and others. Co-products and others accounted for 24 percent, 26 percent and 25
percent of the Companys net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Refined corn oil (from
germ) is sold to packers of cooking oil and to producers of margarine, salad dressings, shortening,
mayonnaise and other foods. Corn gluten feed is sold as animal feed. Corn gluten meal is sold as
high protein feed for chickens, pet food and aquaculture primarily, and steepwater is sold as an
additive for animal feed.
3
Geographic Scope and Operations
The Company operates in one business segment, corn refining, and is managed on a geographic
regional basis. The business includes regional operations in North America, South America and
Asia/Africa. In 2005, approximately 60 percent of the Companys net sales were derived from
operations in North America, while South America and Asia/Africa represented approximately 26
percent and 14 percent, respectively. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements entitled Segment Information, included herewith as part of Exhibit 13.1, for certain
financial information with respect to geographic areas.
The Companys North America region consists of operations in the US, Canada and Mexico. The
regions facilities include 9 plants producing regular and modified starches, dextrose, high
fructose, glucose and high maltose corn syrups and corn syrup solids, dextrins and maltodextrins,
caramel color and sorbitol. The Companys plant in Bedford Park, Illinois is a major supplier of
starch and dextrose products for the Companys US and export customers. The Companys other US
plants in Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Stockton, California enjoy strong market shares in
their local areas, as do the Companys Canadian plants in Cardinal, London and Port Colborne,
Ontario. The Winston-Salem, Stockton, Port Colborne and London plants primarily produce high
fructose corn syrup. The Company is the largest corn refiner in Mexico with plants in Guadalajara,
Mexico City and San Juan del Rio.
The Company is the largest corn refiner in South America, with strong market shares in
Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Colombia. The Companys South America region includes 11 plants that
produce regular, modified, waxy and tapioca starches, high fructose and high maltose corn syrups
and corn syrup solids, dextrins and maltodextrins, dextrose, caramel color, sorbitol and vegetable
adhesives.
The Companys Asia/Africa region consists of corn and tapioca refining operations in South
Korea, Pakistan, Thailand, Kenya and China. The regions facilities include 7 plants that produce
modified, regular, waxy and tapioca starches, dextrins, glucose, dextrose, high fructose corn
syrups and caramel color.
In addition to the operations in which it engages directly, the Company has strategic
alliances through technical license agreements with companies in South Africa and Venezuela. As a
group, the Companys strategic alliance partners produce high fructose, glucose and high maltose
syrups (both corn and tapioca), regular, modified, waxy and tapioca starches, dextrose and
dextrins, maltodextrins and caramel color. These products have leading positions in many of their
target markets.
Competition
The corn refining industry is highly competitive. Many of the Companys products are viewed as
commodities that compete with virtually identical products and derivatives manufactured by other
companies in the industry. The US is a highly competitive market. Competitors include ADM Corn
Processing Division (ADM) (a division of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company), Cargill, Tate & Lyle
Ingredients Americas, Inc., National Starch and Chemical Company (National Starch) (a subsidiary
of Imperial Chemicals Industries plc) and several others. Mexico and Canada face competition from
US imports and local producers including ALMEX, a Mexican joint venture between ADM and Staley. In
South America, Cargill and National Starch have corn-refining operations in Brazil. Other local
corn and tapioca refiners also operate in many of our markets. Competition within markets is
largely based on price, quality and product availability.
4
Several of the Companys products also compete with products made from raw materials other
than corn. High fructose corn syrup and monohydrate dextrose compete principally with cane and beet
sugar products. Co-products such as corn oil and gluten meal compete with products of the corn dry
milling industry and with soybean oil, soybean meal and others. Fluctuations in prices of these
competing products may affect prices of, and profits derived from, the Companys products.
Customers
The Company supplies a broad range of customers in over 60 industries. Approximately 19
percent of the Companys 2005 net sales were to companies engaged in the processed foods industry
and approximately 18 percent of the Companys 2005 net sales were to companies engaged in the soft
drink industry. Additionally, approximately 11 percent of the Companys 2005 net sales were to the
animal feed market.
Raw Materials
The basic raw material of the corn refining industry is yellow dent corn. The supply of corn
in the United States has been, and is anticipated to continue to be, adequate for the Companys
domestic needs. The price of corn, which is determined by reference to prices on the Chicago Board
of Trade, fluctuates as a result of three primary supply factors: farmer planting decisions,
climate, and government policies and three major market demand factors: livestock feeding,
shortages or surpluses of world grain supplies, and domestic and foreign government policies and
trade agreements.
Corn is also grown in other areas of the world, including Canada, South Africa, Argentina,
Brazil, China, Pakistan and Kenya. The Companys affiliates outside the United States utilize both
local supplies of corn and corn imported from other geographic areas, including the United States.
The supply of corn for these affiliates is also generally expected to be adequate for the Companys
needs. Corn prices for the Companys non-US affiliates generally fluctuate as a result of the same
factors that affect US corn prices.
Due to the competitive nature of the corn refining industry and the availability of substitute
products not produced from corn, such as sugar from cane or beet, end product prices may not
necessarily fluctuate in a manner that correlates to raw material costs of corn.
The Company follows a policy of hedging its exposure to commodity fluctuations with
commodities futures contracts for certain of its North American corn purchases. All firm-priced
business is hedged. Other business may or may not be hedged at any given time based on
managements judgment as to the need to fix the costs of its raw materials to protect the Companys
profitability. See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, section
entitled Commodity Costs for additional information.
Product Development
Corn Products has a product application technology center that directs the product development
teams worldwide to develop product application solutions to better serve the ingredient needs of
the Companys customers. Product development activity is focused on developing product
applications for identified customer and market needs. Through this approach, the Company has
developed value-added products for use in the corrugated paper, food, textile, baking and
confectionery industries. The Company usually collaborates with customers to develop the desired
product application either in the customers facilities, the Companys technical service
laboratories or on a contract basis. These efforts are supported by the Companys marketing,
product technology and technology support staff.
5
Sales and Distribution
Salaried sales personnel, who are generally dedicated to customers in a geographic region,
sell the Companys products directly to manufacturers and distributors. In addition, the Company
has a staff that provides technical support to the sales personnel on an industry basis. The
Company generally contracts with trucking companies to deliver bulk products to customer
destinations for product delivery. In North America, the trucks generally ship to nearby customers.
For customers located considerable distances from Company plants, either rail or a combination of
railcars and trucks is used to deliver product. Railcars are generally leased for terms of five to
fifteen years.
Patents, Trademarks and Technical License Agreements
The Company owns a number of patents, which relate to a variety of products and processes, and
a number of established trademarks under which the Company markets such products. The Company also
has the right to use certain other patents and trademarks pursuant to patent and trademark
licenses. The Company does not believe that any individual patent or trademark is material to its
business. There is not currently any pending challenge to the use or registration of any of the
Companys significant patents or trademarks that would have a material adverse impact on the
Company or its results of operations.
The Company is a party to technical license agreements with third parties in other countries
whereby the Company provides technical, management and business advice on the operations of corn
refining businesses and receives royalties in return. These arrangements provide the Company with
product penetration in the various countries in which they exist, as well as experience and
relationships that could facilitate future expansion. The duration of the agreements range from one
to three years, and can be extended by mutual agreement. These relationships have been in place for
many years. These agreements in the aggregate provide approximately $3 million of annual income to
the Company.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately 6,000 employees. Approximately 32
percent of US and 60 percent of non-US employees are unionized. The Company believes its union and
non-union employee relations are good. In addition, the Company has approximately 1,000 temporary
employees.
Government Regulation and Environmental Matters
As a manufacturer and maker of food items and items for use in the pharmaceutical industry,
the Companys operations and the use of many Company products are subject to various US, state,
foreign and local statutes and regulations, including the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and
the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and to regulation by various government agencies, including
the United States Food and Drug Administration, which prescribe requirements and establish
standards for product quality, purity and labeling. The finding of a failure to comply with one or
more regulatory requirements can result in a variety of sanctions, including monetary fines. No
such fines of a material nature were imposed on the Company in 2005. The Company may also be
required to comply with US, state, foreign and local laws regulating food handling and storage. The
Company believes these laws and regulations have not negatively affected its competitive position.
6
The operations of the Company are also subject to various US, state, foreign and local laws
and regulations with respect to environmental matters, including air and water quality and
underground fuel storage tanks, and other regulations intended to protect public health and the
environment. Based upon current laws and regulations and the enforcement and interpretations
thereof, the Company does not expect that the costs of future environmental compliance will be a
material expense, although there can be no assurance that the Company will remain in compliance or
that the costs of remaining in compliance will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
future financial condition and results of operations.
The Company currently anticipates that it may spend approximately $6 million in fiscal 2006
for environmental control and wastewater treatment equipment to be incorporated into existing
facilities and in planned construction projects, including the Argo coal boiler project described
in Exhibit 13.1 filed herewith, in the section entitled, Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Other
The Companys Internet address is www.cornproducts.com. The Company makes available,
free of charge through its Internet website, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These reports are
made available as soon as reasonably practicable after the respective reports are electronically
filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Companys corporate
governance guidelines, Board committee charters and code of ethics are posted on the Companys
website, the address of which is www.cornproducts.com, and each is available in print to any
shareholder upon request in writing to Corn Products International, Inc., 5 Westbrook Corporate
Center, Westchester, Illinois 60154 Attention: Corporate Secretary. The contents of our website
are not incorporated by reference into this report.
7
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Set forth below are the names and ages of all executive officers of the Company, indicating
their positions and offices with the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
All positions and offices with the Company |
Samuel C. Scott III
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
since February 2001 and President since
1997. Mr. Scott also served as Chief
Operating Officer from 1997 through
January 2001. Prior thereto, he served as
President of the worldwide Corn Refining
Business of CPC International, Inc; now
Unilever Bestfoods (CPC), from 1995 to
1997 and was President of CPCs North
American Corn Refining Business from 1989
to 1997. He was elected a Vice President
of CPC in 1991. Mr. Scott is a director
of Motorola, Inc., The Bank of New York,
ACCION U.S.A. and Inroads Chicago. He is
also a Trustee of the Chicago Symphony
Orchestra and the Conference Board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheryl K. Beebe
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer since February 2004. Ms. Beebe
previously served as Vice President,
Finance from July 2002 to February 2004,
as Vice President from 1999 to 2002 and
as Treasurer from 1997 to February 2004.
Prior thereto, she served as Director of
Finance and Planning for the CPC Corn
Refining Business worldwide from 1995 to
1997 and as Director of Financial
Analysis and Planning for Corn Products
North America from 1993. Ms. Beebe joined
CPC in 1980 and served in various
financial positions in CPCs US consumer
food business, North American audit group
and worldwide corporate treasury
function. She is a member of the Board
of Trustees for Farleigh Dickinson
University. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcia E. Doane
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary since 1997. Ms. Doane
served as Vice President, Legal and
Regulatory Affairs of the Corn Products
Division of CPC from 1996 to 1997. Prior
thereto, she served as Counsel to the
Corn Products Division from 1994 to 1996.
Ms. Doane joined CPCs Legal Department
in 1989 as Operations Attorney for the
Corn Products Division. |
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
All positions and offices with the Company |
Jorge L. Fiamenghi
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President and President of the South
America Division since 1999. Mr. Fiamenghi
served as Acting President, US/Canadian Region
from August 2001 to February 2002. Mr.
Fiamenghi served as President and General
Manager, Corn Products Brazil from 1996 to
1999. Mr. Fiamenghi was General Manager for
the CPC Corn Refining affiliate in Argentina
beginning in 1991. Prior thereto, he was
Financial and Planning Director for the CPC
South American Corn Refining Division from
1989 to 1991, and served as Financial and
Administrative Manager for the CPC Corn
Refining Division in Mexico beginning in 1987.
Mr. Fiamenghi joined CPC in 1971 and served
in various financial and planning positions in
CPC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack C. Fortnum
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Vice President since 1999 and President of
North America Division since May 2004. Mr.
Fortnum previously served as President,
US/Canadian Region from July 2003 to May 2004,
and as President, US Business from February
2002 until July 2003. Prior to that, Mr.
Fortnum served as Executive Vice President,
US/Canadian Region from August 2001 until
February 2002, as the Controller from 1997 to
2001, as the Vice President of Finance for
Refineries de Maiz, CPCs Argentine
subsidiary, from 1995 to 1997, as the Director
of Finance and Planning for CPCs Latin
America Corn Refining Division from 1993 to
1995, and as the Vice President and
Comptroller of Canada Starch Operating Company
Inc., the Canadian subsidiary of CPC, and as
the Vice President of Finance of the Canadian
Corn Refining Business from 1989. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey B. Hebble
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President since 2000 and President of the
Asia/Africa Division since February 2001.
Prior thereto, Mr. Hebble served as Vice
President of the Asia/Africa Division since
1998. Mr. Hebble joined CPC in 1986 and served
in various positions in the Corn Products
Division and in Stamford Food Industries Sdn.
Berhad, a Corn Products subsidiary in
Malaysia. |
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
All positions and offices with the Company |
James J. Hirchak
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Vice President Human Resources since 1997.
Mr. Hirchak joined CPC in 1976 and held
various Human Resources positions in CPC until
1984, when he joined the CPC Corn Products
Division. In 1987, Mr. Hirchak was appointed
Director, Human Resources for Corn Products
North American Operations and he served as
Vice President, Human Resources for the Corn
Products Division of CPC from 1992 to 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kimberly A. Hunter
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Corporate Treasurer since February 2004. Ms.
Hunter previously served as Director of
Corporate Treasury from September 2001 to
February 2004. Prior to that, she served as
Managing Director, Investment Grade Securities
at Bank One Corporation, a financial
institution, from 1997 to 2000 and as Vice
President, Capital Markets from 1992 to 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robin A. Kornmeyer
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Vice President since September 2002 and
Controller since January 2002. Prior to that,
Mr. Kornmeyer served as Corporate Controller
at Foster Wheeler Ltd., a worldwide
engineering and construction company, from
2000 to 2002 and as its Director of Corporate
Audit Services from 1997 to 2000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Ripley
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Planning, Information
Technology and Compliance since February 2004.
Mr. Ripley previously served as Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since
1997 and Vice President, Finance from 1997 to
July 2002. Prior thereto, he served as
Comptroller of CPC from 1995 to 1997 and as
Vice President of Finance for CPCs North
American Corn Refining Division from 1984 to
1995. Mr. Ripley joined CPC in 1968 as Chief
International Accountant and subsequently
served as CPCs Assistant Corporate
Comptroller, Corporate General Audit
Coordinator and Assistant Comptroller for
CPCs European Consumer Foods Division. |
10
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Company operates in one business segment, corn refining, and the business is managed on a
geographic regional basis. In each country where we conduct business, our business and assets
are subject to varying degrees of risk and uncertainty. The following are factors that we
believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical
results. Additional risks that are currently unknown to us may also impair our business or
adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that are contained in this Form
10-K or in other filings or statements made by the Company may be subject to the risks described
below as well as other risks and uncertainties. Please read the cautionary notice regarding
forward-looking statements in Item 7 below.
The Company operates a multinational business subject to the economic, political and other
risks inherent in operating in foreign countries and with foreign currencies.
The Company has operated in foreign countries and with foreign currencies for many years. The
Companys US dollar denominated results are subject to foreign currency exchange fluctuations and
its operations are subject to political, economic and other risks. Economic changes, terrorist
activity and political unrest may result in business interruption or decreased demand for the
Companys products. Protectionist trade measures and import and export licensing requirements
could also adversely affect the Companys results of operations. The Companys success will depend
in part on its ability to manage continued global political and/or economic uncertainty.
The Company primarily sells world commodities and, historically, local prices have adjusted
relatively quickly to offset the effect of a local currency devaluation. The Company may hedge
transactions that are denominated in a currency other than the currency of the operating unit
entering into the underlying transaction and is subject to the risks normally attendant to such
hedging activities.
Raw material and energy price fluctuations, and supply interruptions and shortages could
adversely affect the Companys results of operations.
The Companys finished products are made primarily from corn. Purchased corn accounts for
between 40 percent and 65 percent of finished product costs. Energy costs represent approximately
14 percent of the Companys finished product costs. The primary use of energy is to create steam
in the production process and in dryers to dry product. The Company consumes coal, natural gas,
electricity, wood and fuel oil to generate energy. The market prices for these commodities vary
depending on supply and demand, world economies and other factors. The Company purchases these
commodities based on its anticipated usage and the future outlook for these costs. The Company
cannot assure that it will be able to purchase these commodities at prices that it can adequately
pass on to customers to sustain or increase profitability.
In the US and Canada, the Company sells a large portion of finished product at firm prices
established in supply contracts typically lasting for periods of up to one year. In order to
minimize the effect of volatility in the cost of corn related to these firm-priced supply
contracts, the Company takes hedging positions by entering into corn futures contracts. From time
to time, the Company may also enter into anticipatory hedges. These contracts typically mature
within one year. At expiration, the Company settles the derivative contracts at a net amount equal
to the difference between the then-current price of corn and the fixed contract price. While these
hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, changes in the value of the underlying
exposures the Company is hedging generally offset such
11
fluctuations. While the corn futures
contracts or hedging positions are intended to minimize the volatility of corn costs on
operating profits, occasionally the hedging activity can result in losses, some of which may
be material. Outside of North America, sales of finished product under long-term, firm-priced
supply contracts are not material. The Company also periodically uses derivative financial
instruments to hedge portions of its natural gas costs, primarily in its North American operations.
The Companys ability to generate an adequate return on investment is uncertain.
The Companys ability to generate operating income and to increase profitability depends to a
large extent upon its ability to price finished products at a level that will cover manufacturing
and raw material costs and provide a profit margin. The Companys ability to maintain appropriate
price levels is determined by a number of factors largely beyond the Companys control, such as
aggregate industry supply and market demand, which may vary from time to time, and the economic
condition of the geographic region of the Companys operations.
The Companys inability to contain costs could adversely affect its future profitability and
growth.
The Companys future profitability and growth depends on the Companys ability to contain
operating costs and per-unit product costs and to maintain and/or implement effective cost control
programs, while at the same time maintaining competitive pricing and superior quality products,
customer service and support. The Companys ability to maintain a competitive cost structure
depends on continued containment of manufacturing, delivery and administrative costs as well as the
implementation of cost-effective purchasing programs for raw materials, energy and related
manufacturing requirements.
If the Company is unable to contain its operating costs and maintain the productivity and
reliability of its production facilities, the profitability and growth of the Company could be
adversely affected.
The Company may not have access to the funds required for future growth and expansion.
The Company may need additional funds for working capital to grow and expand its operations.
To the extent possible, the Company expects to fund its capital expenditures from operating cash
flow. If the Companys operating cash flow is insufficient to fund such expenditures, the Company
may either reduce its capital expenditures or utilize certain general credit facilities. The
Company may also seek to generate additional liquidity through the sale of debt or equity
securities in private or public markets or through the sale of non-productive assets. The Company
cannot provide any assurance that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund anticipated
capital expenditures or that additional funds can be obtained from financial markets or from the
sale of assets at terms favorable to the Company. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient
cash flows or raise sufficient additional funds to cover capital expenditures, it may not be able
to achieve its desired operating efficiencies and expansion plans, which may adversely impact the
Companys competitiveness and, therefore, its results of operations.
Increased interest rates could increase our borrowing costs.
From time to time the Company may issue securities to finance acquisitions, capital
expenditures, working capital and for other general corporate purposes. An increase in interest
rates in the general economy could result in an increase in the Companys borrowing costs for these
financings, as well as under any existing debt that bears interest at an unhedged floating rate.
12
The Company operates in a highly competitive environment and it may be difficult to preserve
operating margins and maintain market share.
The Company operates in a highly competitive environment. Almost all of the Companys products
compete with virtually identical or similar products manufactured by other companies in the corn
refining industry. In the United States, there are other corn refiners, several of which are
divisions of larger enterprises that have greater financial resources and some of which, unlike the
Company, have vertically integrated their corn refining and other operations. Many of the Companys
products also compete with products made from raw materials other than corn. Fluctuation in prices
of these competing products may affect prices of, and profits derived from, the Companys products.
Competition within markets is largely based on price, quality and product availability.
Due to market volatility, the Company cannot assure that it can adequately pass potential
increases in the cost of corn on to customers through product price increases or purchase
quantities sufficient to sustain or increase its profitability.
Corn purchasing costs, which include the price of the corn plus delivery cost, account for 40
percent to 65 percent of the Companys product costs. The price and availability of corn is
influenced by economic and industry conditions, including supply and demand factors such as crop
disease and severe weather conditions such as drought, floods or frost that are difficult to
anticipate and cannot be controlled by the Company. In addition, government programs supporting
sugar prices indirectly impact the price of corn sweeteners, especially high fructose corn syrup.
Volatility in the stock market fluctuations and in quarterly operating results and other
factors could adversely affect the market price of the Companys common stock.
The market price for the common stock of the Company may be significantly affected by factors
such as the announcement of new products or services by the Company or its competitors;
technological innovation by the Company, its competitors or other vendors; quarterly variations in
the Companys operating results or the operating results of the Companys competitors; general
conditions in the Companys and its customers markets; changes in the earnings estimates by
analysts or reported results that vary materially from such estimates. In addition, the stock
market has experienced significant price fluctuations that have affected the market prices of
equity securities of many companies that have been unrelated to the operating performance of any
individual company.
Changes in consumer preferences and perceptions may lessen the demand for the Companys
products, which would reduce sales and harm the Companys business.
Food products are often affected by changes in consumer tastes, national, regional and local
economic conditions and demographic trends. The Companys sales could also be affected by changing
consumer tastesfor instance, if prevailing health or dietary preferences cause consumers to avoid
food products containing sweetener products in favor of foods that are perceived as more healthy.
13
The uncertainty of acceptance of products developed through biotechnology could effect the
profitability of the Company.
The commercial success of agricultural products developed through biotechnology depends in
part on public acceptance of their development, cultivation, distribution and consumption. Public
attitudes can be influenced by claims that genetically modified products are unsafe for consumption
or that they pose unknown risks to the environment even if such claims are not based on scientific
studies. These public attitudes can influence regulatory and legislative decisions about
biotechnology even where they are approved. The sale of the Companys products may in the future
be delayed or impaired because of adverse public perception regarding the safety of the Companys
products and the potential effects of these products on animals, human health and the environment.
Our profitability could be negatively impacted if we fail to maintain satisfactory labor
relations.
Approximately 32 percent of US and 60 percent of non-US employees are unionized. Strikes,
lockouts or other work stoppages or slow downs involving the Companys unionized employees could
have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Company may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions or strategic alliances on
favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or alliances, and
such acquisitions could result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and require
significant management resources.
The Company regularly reviews potential acquisitions of complementary businesses,
technologies, services or products, as well as potential strategic alliances. The Company may be
unable to find suitable acquisition candidates or appropriate partners with which to form
partnerships or strategic alliances. Even if the Company identifies appropriate acquisition or
alliance candidates, it may be unable to complete such acquisitions or alliances on favorable
terms, if at all. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired business, technology,
service or product into the Companys existing business and operations may result in unforeseen
operating difficulties and expenditures. Integration of an acquired company also may require
significant management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of the
Companys business. Moreover, the Company may not realize the anticipated benefits of any
acquisition or strategic alliance, and such transactions may not generate anticipated financial
results. Future acquisitions could also require issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of
debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses related to the other intangible assets, any
of which could harm the Companys business.
No assurance can be given that the Company will continue to pay dividends.
The payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors and will be
subject to the Companys financial results and the availability of surplus funds to pay dividends.
Anti-takeover provisions in the Companys charter documents and under Delaware law may make it
more difficult to acquire the Company.
Certain provisions of the Companys Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the
Corn Products Charter) and the Companys Amended By-laws (the Corn Products By-Laws) and of the
Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL) may have the effect of delaying, deterring or
preventing a change in control of the Company not approved by the Companys Board. These provisions
14
include (i) a
classified Board of Directors, (ii) a requirement of the unanimous consent of all stockholders
for action to be taken without a meeting, (iii) a requirement that special meetings of stockholders
be called only by the Chairman of the Board or the Board of Directors, (iv) advance notice
requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations, (v) limitations on the ability of
stockholders to amend, alter or repeal the Corn Products Amended By-Laws and certain provisions of
the Corn Products Charter, (vi) authorization for the Companys Board to issue without stockholder
approval preferred stock with such terms as the Board of Directors may determine and (vii)
authorization for the Companys Board to consider the interests of creditors, customers, employees
and other constituencies of the Company and its subsidiaries and the effect upon communities in
which the Company and its subsidiaries do business, in evaluating proposed corporate transactions.
With certain exceptions, Section 203 of the DGCL (Section 203) imposes certain restrictions on
mergers and other business combinations between the Company and any holder of 15 percent or more of
the Companys Common Stock. In addition, the Company has adopted a stockholder rights plan (the
Rights Plan). The Rights Plan is designed to protect stockholders in the event of an unsolicited
offer and other takeover tactics, which, in the opinion of the Companys Board, could impair the
Companys ability to represent stockholder interests. The provisions of the Rights Plan may render
an unsolicited takeover of the Company more difficult or less likely to occur or might prevent such
a takeover.
These provisions of the Corn Products Charter and Corn Products By-laws, the DGCL and the
Rights Plan could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in
control of the Company, although such proposals, if made, might be considered desirable by a
majority of the Companys stockholders. Such provisions could also make it more difficult for third
parties to remove and replace the members of the Companys Board. Moreover, these provisions could
diminish the opportunities for a stockholder to participate in certain tender offers, including
tender offers at prices above the then-current market value of the Companys Common Stock, and may
also inhibit increases in the market price of the Companys Common Stock that could result from
takeover attempts or speculation.
The Companys reliance on certain industries for a significant portion of sales could have a
material adverse affect on the business.
Approximately 19 percent of the Companys 2005 worldwide sales were made to companies engaged
in the processed foods industry and approximately 18 percent were made to companies in the soft
drink industry. Additionally, approximately 11 percent of the Companys 2005 worldwide sales were
made to the animal feed market. If the Companys processed foods customers, soft drink customers
or animal feed customers were to substantially decrease their purchases, the business of the
Company might be materially adversely affected. However, the Company believes there is no
concentration of risk with any single customer or supplier, or small group of customers or
suppliers, whose failure or non-performance would materially affect the Companys results.
An outbreak of a life threatening communicable disease could negatively impact the Companys
business.
The outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) previously affected the economies
of certain countries where the Companys products are manufactured and sold. If the economies of
any countries where the company sells or manufactures its products is affected by a similar
outbreak of SARS, the Avian Flu, or other life threatening communicable diseases, it could result
in decreased sales and unfavorably impact the Companys business.
15
Cross-border disputes between countries in which the Company operates could result in duties,
taxes or other costs that could adversely affect the Companys results of operations.
Due to cross-border disputes with the United States, the Companys operations in Mexico and
Canada could be adversely affected by actions taken by the governments of those two countries. In
2002, Mexico imposed a discriminatory tax on beverages sweetened with HFCS, which resulted in a
substantial reduction of sales of HFCS in Mexico. However, sales of HFCS in Mexico have returned
to historical levels and are continuing despite the continuation of the tax. In addition, Canada
has recently imposed a significant duty on imported United States grain. If we are unable to
maintain sales levels of high fructose corn syrup in Mexico and/or minimize the impact of the
duties in Canada, the results of operations for these two countries could be negatively affected
and the Company could be required to recognize a charge for impairment.
The recognition of impairment charges on goodwill or long-lived assets would adversely impact
the future financial position and results of operations of the Company.
The Company performs an annual impairment assessment for goodwill and, as necessary, for
long-lived assets. If the results of such assessments were to show that the fair value of the
property, plant and equipment or goodwill were less than the carrying values, the Company would be
required to recognize a charge for impairment of goodwill and/or long-lived assets and the amount
of the impairment charge could be material.
Unanticipated changes in our tax rates or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could
impact the Companys profitability.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various other foreign
jurisdictions, and our domestic and international tax liabilities are subject to allocation of
expenses among different jurisdictions. Our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by
changes in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, changes in tax laws or tax rates, changes in the
valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and material adjustments from tax audits.
In particular, the carrying value of deferred tax assets, which are predominantly in the US,
is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income in the US. In addition, the amount
of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits in various jurisdictions and a material
assessment by a governing tax authority could affect our profitability.
Operating difficulties at the Companys manufacturing plants could adversely affect our
operating results.
Corn refining is a capital intensive industry. The Company has 27 plants and has preventive
maintenance and de-bottlenecking programs designed to maintain and improve grind capacity and
facility reliability. This includes the shutdown and replacement of three current coal-fired
boilers with one new coal-fired boiler at our Argo facility in Bedford Park, Illinois. See also
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, section
entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources, included herewith as part of Exhibit 13.1 for
additional information relating to this capital project. If the Company encounters operating
difficulties at a plant for an extended period of time or start up problems with the Argo boiler or
other improvement projects, we may not be able to meet certain sales order commitments and could
incur significantly higher operating expenses which could adversely affect our operating results.
16
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company operates, directly and through its consolidated subsidiaries, 27 manufacturing
facilities, 26 of which are owned and one of which is leased (Jundiai, Brazil). In addition, the
Company leases its corporate headquarters in Westchester, Illinois. The following list details the
locations of the Companys manufacturing facilities within each of its three geographic regions:
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
South America |
|
Asia/Africa |
Cardinal, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Baradero, Argentina
|
|
Shouguang, China |
London, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Chacabuco, Argentina
|
|
Eldoret, Kenya |
Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Balsa Nova, Brazil
|
|
Cornwala, Pakistan |
San Juan del Rio, Queretaro, Mexico
|
|
Cabo, Brazil
|
|
Faisalabad, Pakistan |
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
|
|
Conchal, Brazil
|
|
Ichon, South Korea |
Mexico City, Edo. de Mexico
|
|
Jundiai, Brazil
|
|
Inchon, South Korea |
Stockton, California, U.S.
|
|
Mogi-Guacu, Brazil
|
|
Sikhiu, Thailand |
Bedford Park, Illinois, U.S.
|
|
Llay-Llay, Chile |
|
|
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.
|
|
Barranquilla, Colombia |
|
|
|
|
Cali, Colombia |
|
|
|
|
Guayaquil, Ecuador |
|
|
The Company believes its manufacturing facilities are sufficient to meet its current
production needs. The Company has preventive maintenance and de-bottlenecking programs designed to
further improve grind capacity and facility reliability. This includes the shutdown and
replacement of three current coal-fired boilers with one new coal-fired boiler at our Argo facility
in Bedford Park, Illinois. See also Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, section entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources, included herewith as
part of Exhibit 13.1 for additional information relating to this capital project.
The Company has electricity co-generation facilities at all of its US and Canadian plants, as
well as at its plants in San Juan del Rio, Mexico; Baradero, Argentina; and Balsa Nova and
Mogi-Guacu, Brazil, that provide electricity at a lower cost than is available from third parties.
The Company generally owns and operates such co-generation facilities itself, except for the
facilities at its Stockton, California; Cardinal, Ontario; Balsa Nova and Mogi-Guacu, Brazil
locations, that are owned by, and operated pursuant to co-generation agreements with, third
parties.
17
The Company believes it has competitive facilities. In recent years, significant capital
expenditures have been made to update, expand and improve the Companys facilities, averaging $110
million per year for the last three years. The Company believes these capital expenditures will
allow the Company to operate efficient facilities for the foreseeable future. The Company
currently anticipates that capital expenditures for 2006 will approximate $150 million. Included
in this estimate are expenditures relating to the completion of the previously announced $100
million capital project at our Argo plant located in Bedford Park, Illinois. Construction began in
the fourth quarter of 2004 and the project is expected to be
completed by the end of the third quarter of 2006. It is anticipated that annual capital
expenditures beyond 2006 will be in line with historical averages.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On October 21, 2003, the Company submitted, on its own behalf and on behalf of its Mexican
affiliate, CPIngredientes, S.A. de C.V., (previously known as Compania Proveedora de Ingredientes)
a Request for Institution of Arbitration Proceedings Submitted Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (the Request). The Request was submitted to the
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and was brought against the United
Mexican States. In the Request, the Company asserts that the imposition by Mexico of a
discriminatory tax on beverages containing HFCS breached various obligations of Mexico under NAFTA.
The Company seeks damages of not less than $325 million. See also Note 3 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Exhibit 13.1 herewith.
Between May and June of 2005, the Company, Samuel Scott and Cheryl Beebe were named as
defendants in five purported securities class action suits filed in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaints alleged violations of certain federal
securities laws and sought unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of the
Companys common stock between January 25, 2005 and April 4, 2005. In August 2005, all of these
class actions were consolidated in the matter of Monty Blatt v. Corn Products International,
Inc. (N.D. Ill. 05 C 3033). In November 2005, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended
complaint containing essentially the same legal claims. Cheryl Beebe was not named as a defendant
in the consolidated amended complaint. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and
intends to defend it vigorously. The matter has been tendered by the Company to its insurance
carrier for defense and indemnification.
In July 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit, Halverson v. Samuel Scott, et al. (05
CH 12162), was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois against Corn Products
International, its directors and certain members of senior management. The lawsuit makes various
claims asserting mismanagement and breaches of fiduciary duty related to the Companys performance
in the first quarter of 2005. The subject matter of the derivative lawsuit is substantially the
same as that of the shareholder class action, Monty Blatt v. Corn Products International,
Inc. (N.D. Ill. 05 C 3033). All proceedings in this lawsuit are currently stayed by agreement
of the parties. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend it
vigorously. The matter has been tendered by the Company to its insurance carrier for defense and
indemnification.
The Company is defending claims brought against its predecessor, which was named as one of the
defendants in a number of private treble damage state class actions by direct and indirect HFCS
customers. The only remaining action still pending is in the state court of Kansas. Preliminary
approval of the Kansas settlement was granted by the judge assigned to the case on December 10,
2004 and notice to the class has been completed. The Company expects final approval of the Kansas
settlement. The terms of the proposed settlement would not have a material adverse effect on the
financial results of the Company.
18
In June 2005, certain associations purporting to represent Canadian corn producers filed a
request that the Canadian government investigate the effect of United States corn subsidization on
the Canadian corn market and the alleged dumping of United States corn into Canada. In September
2005, the Canadian government initiated an anti-dumping and/or countervailing duty investigation on
corn imported from the United States. In November 2005, the Canadian government made a positive
determination in connection with the preliminary determination of injury and in December 2005
imposed preliminary antidumping and
countervailing duties. The
Company has been and continues to vigorously oppose the imposition
of antidumping and countervailing duties.
The Company is currently subject to various other claims and suits arising
in the ordinary course of business, including certain environmental proceedings. The Company does
not believe that the results of such legal proceedings, even if unfavorable to the Company, will be
material to the Company. There can be no assurance, however, that any claims or suits arising in
the future, whether taken individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of
proxies or otherwise, during the quarter ended December 31, 2005.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES |
Shares of Corn Products Common Stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under
the ticker symbol CPO. Information about the range of the NYSE reported high, low and closing
market prices of the Companys Common Stock, holders of record and quarterly dividends are
incorporated by reference from the Supplemental Financial Information filed herewith as part of
Exhibit 13.1, section entitled Common Stock Market Prices and Dividends.
The Companys policy is to pay a modest dividend. The amount and timing of the dividend
payment, if any, is based on a number of factors including estimated earnings, financial position
and cash flow. The payment of a dividend is solely at the discretion of the Companys Board of
Directors. It is subject to the Companys financial results and the availability of surplus funds
to pay dividends.
19
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
Shares that may yet |
|
|
Number |
|
Price |
|
part of Publicly |
|
be Purchased Under |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
the Plans or |
(shares in thousands) |
|
Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
Oct. 1 Oct. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311 shares |
Nov. 1 Nov. 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311 shares |
Dec. 1 Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311 shares |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 9, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program,
which runs through February 28, 2010, under which the Company may repurchase up to 4 million shares
of its outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had repurchased 1.69 million
shares under the program, leaving 2.31 million shares available for repurchase.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Incorporated by reference from the Supplemental Financial Infomation filed herewith as part of
Exhibit 13.1, section entitled Ten-Year Financial Highlights.
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13.1 filed herewith, section entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. The Company intends these forward looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for such statements. These statements include, among other things, any predictions
regarding the Companys future financial condition, earnings, revenues, expenses or other financial
items, any statements concerning the Companys prospects or future operation, including
managements plans or strategies and objectives therefor and any assumptions underlying the
foregoing. These statements can sometimes be identified by the use of forward looking words such
as may, will, anticipate, believe, plan, project, estimate, expect, intend,
continue, pro forma, forecast or other similar expressions or the negative thereof. All
statements other than statements of historical facts in this report or referred to or incorporated
by reference into this report are forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to
certain inherent risks and uncertainties. Although we believe our expectations reflected in these
forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, stockholders are cautioned that no
assurance can be given that our expectations will prove correct. Actual results and developments
may differ materially from the expectations conveyed in these statements, based on various factors,
including fluctuations in worldwide commodities markets and the associated risks of hedging against
such fluctuations; fluctuations in aggregate industry supply and market demand; general political,
economic, business, market and weather conditions in the various
20
geographic regions and countries
in which we manufacture and/or sell our
products; fluctuations in the value of local currencies, energy costs and availability,
freight and shipping costs, and changes in regulatory controls regarding quotas, tariffs, duties,
taxes and income tax rates; operating difficulties; boiler reliability; labor disputes; genetic and
biotechnology issues; changing consumption preferences and trends; increased competitive and/or
customer pressure in the corn-refining industry; the outbreak or continuation of hostilities
including acts of terrorism; stock market fluctuation and volatility; and our ability to maintain
sales levels of HFCS in Mexico. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which
they are made and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statement. If we do update or correct one or
more of these statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional
updates or corrections. For a further description of risk factors, see Item 1A-Risk Factors above
and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K.
|
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Interest Rate Exposure. Approximately 61 percent of the Companys borrowings at December 31,
2005 are fixed rate bonds and loans. Interest on the remaining 39 percent of the Companys
borrowings is subject to change based on changes in short-term rates, which could affect our
interest costs. Included in the floating rate indebtedness information above is $150 million of
our $200 million Senior Notes due 2009 which, through the use of interest rate swaps, had
effectively been converted from fixed to floating rate debt. Included in the fixed rate
indebtedness information above is $18 million of Korean term loan debt which, through the use of
cross currency interest rate swaps, has effectively been converted from floating rate US dollar to
fixed rate Korean Won debt. See also Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
entitled Financing Arrangements included herewith as part of Exhibit 13.1, for further
information. A hypothetical increase of 1 percentage point in the weighted average floating
interest rate for 2005 would have increased interest expense and reduced pretax income for 2005 by
approximately $3 million.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the carrying and fair values of long-term debt, including the
current portion, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(in millions) |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
8.25% senior notes, due 2007 |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
8.45% senior notes, due 2009 |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Korean loans |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
On February 1, 2006, the Company terminated the fixed to floating interest rate swap
agreements associated with $150 million of its 8.45 percent senior notes. The swap termination
resulted in a gain of approximately $3 million that will be amortized as a reduction to financing
costs over the remaining term of the underlying debt (through August 2009).
Commodity Costs. The Companys finished products are made primarily from corn. In the US and
Canada, the Company sells a large portion of finished product at firm prices established in supply
contracts typically lasting for periods of up to one year. In order to minimize the effect of
volatility in the cost of corn related to these firm-priced supply contracts, the Company enters
into corn futures contracts, or takes hedging positions in the corn futures market. From time to
time, the Company may
21
also enter into anticipatory hedges. These contracts typically mature within
one year. At expiration, the Company settles the derivative contracts at a net amount equal to the
difference between the then-current price of corn and
the fixed contract price. While these hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in
value, changes in the value of the underlying exposures the Company is hedging generally offset
such fluctuations. While the corn futures contracts or hedging positions are intended to minimize
the volatility of corn costs on operating profits, occasionally the hedging activity can result in
losses, some of which may be material. Outside of North America, sales of finished product under
long-term, firm-priced supply contracts are not material.
Energy costs for the Company represent a significant portion of its operating costs. The
primary use of energy is to create steam in the production process and in dryers to dry product.
The Company consumes coal, natural gas, electricity, wood and fuel oil to generate energy. The
market prices for these commodities vary depending on supply and demand, world economies and other
factors. The Company purchases these commodities based on its anticipated usage and the future
outlook for these costs. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to purchase these
commodities at prices that it can adequately pass on to customers to sustain or increase
profitability. The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments to hedge portions of
its natural gas costs, primarily in its North American operations.
The Companys commodity price hedging instruments generally relate to contracted firm-priced
business. Based on the Companys overall commodity hedge exposure at December 31, 2005, a
hypothetical 10 percent decline in market prices applied to the fair value of the instruments would
result in a charge to other comprehensive income (loss) of approximately $22 million, net of income
tax benefit. It should be noted that any change in the fair value of the contracts, real or
hypothetical, would be substantially offset by an inverse change in the value of the underlying
hedged item.
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13.1 filed herewith, sections entitled Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes and
Supplemental Financial Information.
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures as of December 31, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in providing reasonable assurance that all material information required to be filed in
this report has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms. There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over
financial reporting that were identified during the evaluation that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial
reporting.
22
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. This system of internal controls is designed to provide
reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and transactions are properly recorded and
executed in accordance with managements authorization.
Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
1. |
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company. |
|
|
2. |
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the Company. |
|
|
3. |
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of
the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements. |
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting based on the framework of Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the evaluation, management
concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December
31, 2005. Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
as stated in their report, a copy of which follows.
23
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Corn Products International, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Corn Products International, Inc. maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Corn Products International, Inc.s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Corn Products International, Inc. maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Corn Products International,
Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Corn Products International, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, stockholders equity and redeemable equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated March 8, 2006
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
KPMG
LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 8, 2006
24
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information contained under the headings Board of Directors, Matters To Be Acted Upon
Proposal 1. Election of Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in
the Companys definitive proxy statement for the Companys 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
Proxy Statement) and the information contained under the heading Executive Officers of the
Registrant in Item 1 hereof is incorporated herein by reference. The Company has adopted a code
of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and
controller. The code of ethics is posted on the Companys Internet website, which is found at
www.cornproducts.com. The Company intends to include on its website any amendments to, or waivers
from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to the Companys principal executive officer,
principal financial officer or controller that relates to any element of the code of ethics
definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information contained under the heading Executive Compensation in the Proxy Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information contained under the headings Equity Compensation Plan Information as of
December 31, 2005 and Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in the
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information contained under the heading Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information contained under the heading 2005 and 2004 Audit Firm Fee Summary in the
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15(a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13.1 filed herewith, sections entitled Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
25
Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because the information either is not
required or is otherwise included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Item 15(a)(3) Exhibits
The Exhibits set forth in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as a part of this report.
Provided below is a list of each exhibit that contains a management contract or compensatory plan
or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this report:
Exhibit Number
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.14
10.15
10.16
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on the 8th day of March, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Samuel C. Scott III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel C. Scott III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant, in the capacities indicated and
on the 8th day of March, 2006.
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Samuel C. Scott III
Samuel C. Scott III |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ Cheryl K. Beebe
Cheryl K. Beebe |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
/s/ Robin A. Kornmeyer
Robin A. Kornmeyer |
|
Controller |
*Richard J. Almeida
Richard J. Almeida |
|
Director |
*Luis Aranguren
Luis Aranguren |
|
Director |
*Guenther E. Greiner
Guenther E. Greiner |
|
Director |
*Ronald M. Gross
Ronald M. Gross |
|
Director |
*Karen L. Hendricks
Karen L. Hendricks |
|
Director |
*Bernard H. Kastory
Bernard H. Kastory |
|
Director |
27
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
*Gregory B. Kenny
Gregory B. Kenny |
|
Director |
*Barbara A. Klein
Barbara A. Klein |
|
Director |
*William S. Norman
William S. Norman |
|
Director |
*James M. Ringler
James M. Ringler |
|
Director |
*By: /s/ Marcia E. Doane
Marcia E. Doane
Attorney-in-fact |
|
|
(Being the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the controller and all of
the directors of Corn Products International, Inc.)
28
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Amended By-Laws of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3.i to
the Companys report on Form 8-K dated February 3, 2006,
File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of November 19, 1997 (Amended
and Restated as of September 9, 2002), between the
Company and The Bank of New York, filed as Exhibit 4 to
the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
4.2*
|
|
Certificate of Designation for the Companys Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, filed as Exhibit 1
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-Al2B,
File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
4.3*
|
|
Five year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of
September 2, 2004 among the Company and the agents and
banks named therein filed as Exhibit 10 to the Companys
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 |
|
|
|
4.4*
|
|
First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated
October 8, 2004, filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
4.5*
|
|
Indenture Agreement dated as of August 18, 1999 between
the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, filed
on August 27, 1999 as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
current report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-13397, as amended
by First Supplemental Indenture filed on July 8, 2002 as
Exhibit 99.4 to the Companys current report on Form 8-K,
File No. 1-13397, and by Second Supplemental Indenture
filed on November 18, 2002 as Exhibit 4 to the Companys
current report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
4.6*
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated July 8, 2002 between
the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, filed
on July 8, 2002 as Exhibit 99.4 to the Companys current
report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
4.7*
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated November 18, 2002
between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee,
filed on November 18, 2002 as Exhibit 4 to the Companys
current report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
The Corn Products International, Inc. Stock Incentive
Plan, included as Appendix B to the Companys Proxy
Statement filed on Schedule 14A on March 29, 2005, File
No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.2**
|
|
Deferred Stock Unit Plan of the Company |
|
|
|
10.3**
|
|
Form of Severance Agreement entered into by each of the
Named Executive Officers |
29
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Form of Amendment to Executive Severance Agreement entered into by each
of the Named Executive Officers, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.5**
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by each of the members
of the Companys Board of Directors and the Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors of the Company
(Amended and Restated as of September 19, 2001), filed as Exhibit 4(d)
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No.
333-75844, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 1, 2004, filed
as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated as of
January 1, 2001), filed as Exhibit 10 to the Companys quarterly report
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.8**
|
|
Executive Life Insurance Plan |
|
|
|
10.9**
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed as
Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan, included as Appendix C to the Companys Proxy
Statement filed on Schedule 14A on March 29, 2005, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.11*
|
|
Performance Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Companys annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.12**
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement dated December 1, 1997 between the Company and
Bestfoods |
|
|
|
10.13*
|
|
Employee Benefits Agreement dated December 1, 1997 between the Company
and Bestfoods, filed as Exhibit 4.E to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-43525 |
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
Executive Life Insurance Plan, Compensation Committee Summary, filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.15*
|
|
Form of Executive Life Insurance Plan Participation Agreement and
Collateral Assignment entered into by the Named Executive Officers with
the exception of Jorge Fiamenghi, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.16*
|
|
Form of Performance Share Award, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2006, File No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement between Corn Products
Brasil-Ingredientes Industrias Ltda. and Companhia de Ga de Sao
Paulo-Comgas |
30
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Earnings Per Share Computation |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations and Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes |
|
|
|
18.1*
|
|
Preferability letter from KPMG, filed as Exhibit 18.1 to the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File
No. 1-13397 |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
CEO Section 302 Certification Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
CFO Section 302 Certification Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code as created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code as created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated herein by reference as indicated in the exhibit description.
|
|
** |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits filed with the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. |
31
exv10w17
1
Exhibit 10.17
Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement
Cogeneration
Companhia de Gás de São Paulo Comgás
X
Corn Products Brasil Ingredientes Industriais Ltda.
January / 2006
2
Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement
Corn Products Brasil and Companhia de Gás de São Paulo Comgás
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION OF TERMS
|
|
|
4 |
|
ARTICLE TWO PURPOSE
|
|
|
12 |
|
ARTICLE THREE COMMERCIAL SUPPLY
|
|
|
12 |
|
ARTICLE FOUR DAILY CONTRACTED AMOUNT
|
|
|
12 |
|
ARTICLE FIVE QUALITY
|
|
|
13 |
|
ARTICLE SIX DELIVERY POINT AND PROPERTY TRANSFER
|
|
|
16 |
|
ARTICLE SEVEN TERMS FOR DELIVERY OF GAS
|
|
|
16 |
|
ARTICLE EIGHT PRICE
|
|
|
17 |
|
ARTICLE NINE SCHEDULING OF AMOUNTS TO BE TAKEN, COMMITMENTS
AND PENALTIES FOR DEFAULT
|
|
|
18 |
|
ARTICLE TEN COMMITMENT OF PRIORITY OF PURCHASE OF DAILY
CONTRACTED AMOUNT (DCA) OF THE AGREEMENT AND GAS USAGE RESTRICTION
|
|
|
28 |
|
ARTICLE ELEVEN INVOICING, PAYMENT MANNER AND GUARANTEE
|
|
|
30 |
|
ARTICLE TWELVE MEASUREMENT
|
|
|
36 |
|
ARTICLE THIRTEEN EFFECTIVENESS AND EXTENSION
|
|
|
39 |
|
ARTICLE FOURTEEN FORTUITOUS CASE OR FORCE MAJEURE
|
|
|
39 |
|
ARTICLE FIFTEEN- ASSIGNMENT AND ENCUMBRANCE OF RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
43 |
|
ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOVATION AND FORBEARANCE
|
|
|
44 |
|
ARTICLE SEVENTEEN DEFAULT AND TERMINATION
|
|
|
44 |
|
ARTICLE EIGHTEEN NOTICES
|
|
|
49 |
|
ARTICLE NINETEEN DISPUTES RESOLUTION
|
|
|
50 |
|
ARTICLE TWENTY- GENERAL LIMIT OF LIABILITY
|
|
|
59 |
|
ARTICLE TWENTY-ONE AMENDMENT
|
|
|
60 |
|
ARTICLE TWENTY-TWO ANNEXES
|
|
|
60 |
|
ARTICLE TWENTY-THREE CONTRACTUAL AMOUNT
|
|
|
60 |
|
ARTICLE TWENTY-FOUR AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
|
|
|
60 |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
NATURAL GAS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO
BY AND BETWEEN, COMPANHIA DE GÁS DE SÃO PAULO -
COMGÁS AND, ON THE OTHER SIDE, CORN PRODUCTS
BRASIL - INGREDIENTES INDUSTRIAIS LTDA: |
By this private instrument of piped natural gas purchase and sale agreement, the parties hereof, on
the one side, COMPANHIA DE GÁS DE SÃO PAULO COMGÁS, concessionaire of piped gas distribution
services in the State of São Paulo, a corporation of authorized capital, headquartered in the City
of São Paulo, at Rua das Olimpíadas, 205, 10° andar, enrolled with the National Register of Legal
Entities of the Ministry of Finance (CNPJ) under No. 61.856.571/0001-17, hereinafter referred to as
COMGÁS, herein represented as per its by-laws, and, on the other side
CORN PRODUCTS BRASIL INGREDIENTES INDUSTRIAIS LTDA., a private limited company, headquartered in
the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, at Av. do Café, 277, Torre B, 2° andar, enrolled with
the National Register of Legal Entities of the Ministry of Finance (CNPJ) under No.
01.730.520/0001-12, hereinafter referred to as the User, herein properly represented, by
virtue of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, agree to be bound as follows:
WHEREAS:
|
|
the decision of the Federal Government to increase the participation of natural gas in the national energetic
matrix; |
|
|
|
Law No. 9,478/97, which establishes provisions on the National Energetic Policy, has as one of its purposes
the development, in economic bases, of the use of natural gas; |
|
|
|
Decree No. 3,371, of February 24, 2000, which established, within the competency of the Ministry of Mines and
Energy, the Priority Program of Thermoelectricity, and MME Ordinance No. 551, of December 6, 2000,
which ruled the program of incentive to cogeneration, stimulated entrepreneurs and investors to submit
proposals for the implementation of Cogeneration Thermoelectric Projects; |
4
|
|
the Cogeneration Plant was included in said Priority Program of Thermoelectricity by means
of GCE Resolution No. 127 of April 16, 2002; |
|
|
|
as provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 25 of the Constitution of the Republic with the wording ascribed
to it by the Constitutional Amendment No. 5 of August 15, 1995 , it is incumbent upon the States to exploit
directly, or by means of a concession, the piped Gas services pursuant to the law; |
|
|
|
as per the concession agreement entered into with the State of São Paulo, Comgás is the exclusive
concessionaire of public services of piped Gas distribution in the State of São Paulo, covering the
location area of the Cogeneration Plant;
|
|
|
|
Comgás entered into the Comgás-Supplier Agreement with the Supplier;
|
|
|
|
Comgás intends to provide to the User and the latter intends to purchase from
Comgás, according to the rules and conditions of this Agreement, the Natural
Gas to be used exclusively as fuel at the Cogeneration Plant; |
|
|
|
the last generating unit of the Cogeneration Plant started commercial operation on June 26, 2004, in
accordance with ANEEL Decision No. 490 of June 25, 2004; and |
|
|
|
On December, 29, 2004, Comgás and the User executed a gas supply agreement, within the
context of the Priority Program of Thermoelectricity, for the supply of Gas by Comgás
to be used exclusively as fuel in the Cogeneration Plant, which was amended on March, 30,
2005, on May 31, 2005 and on July 20, 2005, on November 20, 2005 and on December 20, 2005
(Short-Term
Agreement), pursuant to which Comgás and the User agreed to execute,
a natural gas supply agreement to be used as fuel in the Cogeneration Plant, also under the
conditions of the Priority Program of Thermoelectricity, with term of up to 20 years; |
do hereby agree to establish that this Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement shall be ruled
by the following clauses and conditions:
ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION OF TERMS
1.1 |
|
In this Agreement, whenever they are written in upper case, the terms below will have the
definitions that are assigned to them in this article: |
Year shall mean a period of time that:
|
a) |
|
for the first Year, shall begin on the Commercial Supply
Start-up Day and shall end the last Day of the corresponding year; |
5
|
b) |
|
for each Year succeeding the Year referred to in item (a)
above, except for the last Year of effectiveness of the Agreement,
shall begin on the first Day of the corresponding year and shall end on the
last Day of the corresponding year; |
|
|
c) |
|
for the last Year of effectiveness of the Agreement, shall
begin on the first Day of the corresponding year and shall end on the last
Day of effectiveness of the Agreement; |
provided, however, that the term year, where not written in upper case, shall mean a
calendar year.
Arbitration - is defined in item 19.1.2.
Arbitrator (First Arbitrator, Second Arbitrator, Third Arbitrator) - shall mean
each member of the Arbitration Tribunal appointed pursuant to item
19.2.3.
Calorie shall mean the quantity of heat required to increase the temperature
from one gram (1g) of pure water from fourteen point five Celsius degrees (14.5ºC) up to
fifteen point five Celsius degrees (15.5ºC) at the absolute pressure of 0.101325MPa.
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure - is defined in Article Fourteen.
Cogeneration Plant - shall mean all the equipment of the cogeneration plant called
Corn Mogi Co-Generator Central, driven by natural gas, located in the Municipality of Mogi
Guaçu, State of São Paulo, which will receive the Gas for purposes of
Cogeneration, inserted into the Priority Program of Thermoelectricity.
Cogeneration - corresponds to the process of combined production of useful heat
and mechanical energy, usually converted totally or partially into electric energy from the
chemical energy made available by one or more fuels, pursuant to Article 3 of ANEEL
Resolution No. 21 of January 20, 2000 or in any other Law that amends or replaces
it.
Reference Conditions - shall mean a temperature of twenty degrees Celsius
(20oC) and absolute pressure of 0.101325MPa and the Superior
Calorific Power (SCP) for the Gas equal to the Reference
Calorific Power.
Base Conditions - shall mean a temperature of twenty degrees Celsius
(20oC) and absolute pressure of 0,101325Mpa.
7
Regulation and Measurement Set (CRM) - Set of equipment owned by
Comgás intended to regulate the pressure and measure and record the
volumes, pressures and temperature of Gas that will supply the Cogeneration
Plant, installed at a place to be assigned by User, close to its
boundary, as agreed upon between the Parties. This station is the one
responsible for officially measuring the Natural Gas supply subject of this
Agreement.
Agreement shall mean this Natural Gas Purchase and Sale
Agreement, its annex, as well as any amendments and changes agreed upon and signed
by the Parties.
Supplier-Comgás Agreement - shall mean a natural gas purchase and sale agreement
entered into between the Supplier and Comgás, having as its purpose the
purchase, by Comgás, and the sale, by Supplier of the Natural Gas
subject of this Agreement, to be used exclusively as fuel at the
Cogeneration Plant.
Short-Term Agreement shall mean the agreement specified in the last whereas.
Day - shall mean a period of time that will start at 6:00 a.m. (six o clock) of
each day and will end at 6:00 a.m. (six o clock) of the following day; and the term day
when not written in upper case shall mean a period of twenty-four (24) hours that will
start at 0:00 (midnight) of each day and will end at midnight (0:00) of the same day.
Collection Document - shall mean every invoice, trade bill, debt note or document
issued by one Party for collection of any amount to be paid, under the
Agreement, by the other Party.
Dollar or US$ - shall mean the legal currency of the United States of
America.
Affiliate Company shall mean any company (i) controlled by one of the
Parties, (ii) the controlling company of one of the Parties or
(iii) under the common control of the controlling company of one of the Parties.
Failure in Supply (FF) - is any situation characterized by the occurrence, on any
given Day, at the Delivery Point, of any one of the following events:
a. lack of availability of Gas in accordance with the Daily
Requested Amount;
7
|
b. |
|
non-acceptance of the Daily Requested Amount (DRA) by Comgás,
except under the terms of item 9.9.1.1 or item 17.1; |
|
|
c. |
|
restriction or interruption in the supply of Gas as a result of an
operating fact not attributable to the User; |
|
|
d. |
|
non-conformity in relation to the specifications of Gas defined in
item 5.1; |
|
|
e. |
|
subject to the provisions of items 7.3 and 7.4, failure to comply with any of
the Gas delivery conditions defined in items 7.2 and 7.5; |
except for any of the following events when there will be no Failure in Supply:
|
i. |
|
the fact being attributed to an Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure; |
|
|
ii. |
|
for a fact attributable to the User; |
|
|
iii. |
|
upon the previous agreement by the User in receiving the
Gas out of specification or in nonconformity with the provisions of item 5.1,
or the receipt of the Gas by the User out of specification or in
nonconformity with the provisions of item 5.1, under the terms of item 5.2 (v); |
|
|
iv. |
|
Comgás refusal to accept a Daily requested amount (DRA)
incompatible with the situations of Comgás Scheduled Interruptions
and/or of Suppliers Scheduled Interruptions . |
Provider is the party with which the Supplier has entered into or may
enter into a natural gas purchase agreement for the supply of Gas subject of this
Agreement.
Commercial Supply- shall mean the supply of Natural Gas made by
Comgás to the User at the Cogeneration Plant under the
conditions set forth in this Agreement.
Guarantee is the guarantee to be delivered by the User to
Comgás, in the terms of item 11.9 and its subitems.
Natural Gas or Gas is the natural gas subject of this
Agreement, consisting of a mixture of hydrocarbons that are essentially comprised
of methane, other hydrocarbons and non-fuel gases, which are extracted from natural
reservoirs and which are found in the gaseous state under the Base Conditions.
When not written in upper case, the terms gas and natural gas refer to the
generality of the product, and not necessarily to this Agreement.
8
Commercial Supply Start-up- shall mean the date, defined under the terms of
Article Three, on which the Commercial Supply shall start.
Law - shall mean any law, code, decree, regulation, resolution, ordinance,
deliberation, judgment, order, directive, political directions, agreements or any other
requirements or restrictions enacted by any Public Body, provided that these
latter two be regulated.
Distribution Margin is defined in items 8.1.2 and 8.1.2.1.
Month shall mean a period of time that:
|
a) |
|
with respect to the first Month, will start on the
Commercial Supply Start-up Day and will end on the last Day of the
relevant month; |
|
|
b) |
|
with respect to each Month of effectiveness
of the Agreement following the first
Month, except for the last
Month of effectiveness of the
Agreement, will start on the first Day of the month and end on the last Day of the relevant month; |
|
|
c) |
|
with respect to the last Month
of effectiveness of the Agreement,
will start on the first Day of the relevant month and end on the last
Day of effectiveness of the Agreement. |
provided, however, that, when not written in upper case, the term month shall mean a
calendar month.
Cubic Meter (m3) - is the volume of Gas that, under
the Base Conditions, occupies the volume of one (1) cubic meter.
Change in Law - shall mean the occurrence, after the execution date of this
Agreement, of any of the following events which demonstrably affects the
performance of the obligations undertaken by the Parties, under the terms of this
instrument:
|
i. |
|
enactment, commencement of effectiveness, change, suspension or revocation of
any Law; |
|
|
ii. |
|
change in the interpretation or application of any Law. |
Notice - shall mean any communication in writing sent by one Party to the
other, required or allowed under the terms of this Agreement.
Public Body - shall mean a body, agency, entity or public law legal entity that
has jurisdiction over either Party or the transactions provided for in this
Agreement.
9
Scheduled Interruptions - are transitory situations foreseen and informed by means
of a Notice with, at least, ninety (90) days in advance, which demand the
restriction or interruption in the supply or receipt of Gas, for purposes of
maintenance or repair, technically recommended, in pipelines, in the Cogeneration Plant
or in related ducts:
|
|
|
to the supply of Gas by the Carrier to the Supplier
or by the Supplier to Comgás (Suppliers Scheduled
Interruptions); |
|
|
|
|
to the supply of Gas by Comgás to the User
(Comgás Scheduled Interruptions); and |
|
|
|
|
to the receipt of Gas by the User, for maintenance of
equipment of the Cogeneration Plant or of the Users plant
(Users Scheduled Interruptions), |
which, for the rightful reasons provided for in this Agreement, shall fit the
following rules or principles:
|
i. |
|
for the User, the total number of days of Scheduled
Interruptions, cumulatively, may not exceed, in each five (5)-Year
period, the average of twenty (20) Days per Year, provided
that, in each Year, the number of days of interruption shall not exceed
sixty (60) Days, Comgás being allowed to coordinate its
Scheduled Interruptions within such period, jointly with the
User; |
|
|
ii. |
|
for Comgás or its Supplier, the total time of
Scheduled Interruptions may not exceed, in each three (3)-Year
period, the total of fifteen (15) Days; |
the Parties shall use their efforts in order to cause the coincidence of their
respective Days of Scheduled Interruptions.
Party(ies) shall mean, in the singular, Comgás or the User, as
per the context; and in the plural, shall mean Comgás and the User,
concomitantly.
Affected Party- shall mean the Party invoking the occurrence of an
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure, in order to be released from the compliance with
any of its obligations under this Agreement.
Expert Proceeding- shall mean the procedure for dispute resolution provided for in
item 19.3.
Expert - shall mean the qualified technician pursuant to item 19.3.3 who is
appointed for purposes of dispute resolution through Expert Proceeding.
10
Reference Calorific Value (RCV) shall mean the SCV of nine thousand four
hundred Kilocalories per Cubic Meter (9,400 kcal/m3).
Superior Calorific Value (SCV) shall mean the quantity of heat produced by
combustion, under constant pressure, of a mass of gas occupying a volume of one cubic meter
(1m3) at the temperature of twenty degrees Celsius (20oC) and under
absolute pressure of 0.101325MPa, with total condensation of the combustion water vapor.
Its measurement unit shall be kcal/m3.
Delivery Point shall mean the location where the Gas shall be made
available to the User, as set forth in Article Six.
Price of Gas Sale - is defined in item 8.1, its subitems related thereto.
Gas Price - is defined in item 8.1.1, its subitems and annex(es) related thereto.
Priority Program of Thermoelectricity (PPT) - shall mean the program for
implementation of thermoelectric plants established by the Federal Government under the
authority of the Ministry of Mines and Energy, in accordance with Decree No. 3,371 of
February 24, 2000.
Amount of Gas or Amount of Natural Gas shall mean any volume
of Natural Gas subject of this Agreement, expressed in Cubic
Meters under the Reference Conditions.
Daily Contracted Amount (DCA) - is the Amount of Gas subject of this
Agreement as defined in Article Four.
Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) is the Amount of Gas subject of this
Agreement, which the User, in its schedule of amounts to be taken, in
accordance with the provisions established in item 9.2, has requested Comgás to
made available at the Delivery Point on the corresponding Day and which
has been accepted by Comgás.
Daily Taken Amount (DTA) - is defined in item 9.4.
Daily Requested Amount (DRA) - is the Amount of Gas that, in accordance
with the rules of this Agreement and subject to the limit of the Daily
Contracted Amount, the User requests that Comgás make available to
the User, on any given day, at the Delivery Point.
Missing Amount (QF) corresponds, on each Day, to the shortfall between
the Daily Requested Amount and the Amount of Gas actually made available
to the User by Comgás at the Delivery Point on that
same Day.
11
Measured Amount (QM) - is the Amount of Gas that, in accordance with the
ascertainment made by the Measurement Systems of the CRM, has been
delivered at the CRM on the Day, corrected for the Reference
Conditions on the Day. For purposes of correction of the
Measured Amount, the factor resulting from the division of the average
daily SCP of Gas on the Day as determined at the point closest
to the CRM where the Gas is sampled for laboratorial analysis by PCR, with
rounding up of the fourth decimal place shall be applied to the measured volume.
Amount Not Taken (ANT) - corresponds, in any given Year or
Month of Gas supply, to an Amount of Gas that the User
has taken below its Take or Pay commitment.
Amount Paid and Not Taken (APNT) - corresponds to the accrued balance, in
Amount of Gas, by the User before Comgás as a result of payments
made to Comgás of the Amounts Not Taken (ANT), and it may be recovered
by the User within the term and under the conditions provided for
in this Agreement.
Amount Paid and Not Taken of the Year (APNTY) is the
specific Amount Paid and Not Taken (APNT) of a determined Year, according
to item 9.5.2.
Amount Recovered by User (ARU) - is an Amount of Gas that on any given
Day or in a given period, in accordance with the rules set forth in Article Nine,
is recovered by the User and deducted from its balance of Amount Paid and Not
Taken (APNT).
Kilocalorie (kcal) - shall mean one thousand (1,000) Calories.
Real or R$ - shall mean the legal currency in Brazil.
Amounts Taken in Excess of Schedule are defined in item 9.6.
Amounts Taken Below Schedule - are defined in item 9.7.
Arbitration Award - shall mean the final award (as per items 19.2.5 and 19.2.6) to
be presented by the Arbitration Tribunal to the Parties in procedures for
disputes resolution.
12
Ship or Pay - is defined in item 9.8.
Measurement System - shall mean the set of primary and secondary elements of flow,
temperature and pressure measurement and, if any, converters, transmitters, flow computers,
integrators and recorders.
Supplier shall mean Petróleo Brasileiro S.A Petrobras, as supplier of
Natural Gas to Comgás, under the terms of Supplier-Comgás
Agreement or any other that may replace it.
Take or Pay is defined in item 9.3, items b and c.
Distribution Take or Pay is defined in item 9.8.2 (ii).
Exchange Rate - means the average rate for sale of Dollar defined as the
effective rate on the respective date of conversion disclosed by the Brazilian Central
Banks System (SISBACEN), identified as PTAX-800 transaction Option 5 Currency 220.
Carrier - shall mean any provider of natural gas transportation service through
pipelines, established in accordance with the applicable provisions of the National
Petroleum Agency (ANP) or an entity replacing it in the competence of regulating and/or
inspecting said activity.
Arbitration Tribunal is defined in item 19.2.3.
Measured Volume means any amount of GAS measured by the CRM measurement
system in cubic meters under the base conditions.
ARTICLE TWO PURPOSE
2.1 |
|
The purpose of this Agreement is the sale and supply by Comgás, and the
purchase and receipt by the User, in the conditions set forth herein, of
Natural Gas, exclusively for serving the needs of the Cogeneration
Plant |
ARTICLE THREE COMMERCIAL SUPPLY
3.1 |
|
For the purposes of this Agreement, it is established, as the date of execution of
this Agreement, the Commercial Supply Start-up date. |
ARTICLE FOUR DAILY CONTRACTED AMOUNT
4.1 |
|
The Daily Contracted Amount (DCA), at the Reference Conditions,
shall be of three hundred thousand Cubic Meters per day (300,000
m3/day). |
13
|
4.1.1 |
|
After ten (10) years the User shall be entitled to increase, the Daily
Contracted Amount (DCA) in up to five percent (5%) upon notice to comgás
sent at least twelve (12) months before the new DCA becomes effective. |
ARTICLE FIVE QUALITY
5.1 The Gas to be delivered by Comgás to the User
shall present characteristics of quality that meet, at least, the specifications of Ordinance
No. 104 of July 8, 2002, issued by the National Petroleum Agency ANP or those
that may replace it in view of a supervening Law.
5.2 Whenever Comgás is aware of the possibility of the Gas being
supplied at the Delivery Point, partially or totally, in nonconformity with the
specifications set forth in item 5.1, the following provisions shall apply:
|
i. |
|
Comgás shall notify, in writing, the User, as soon as
possible, of the expected non-conformity in the Gas to be supplied,
indicating what would be the probable non-conforming items and, precisely, the
respective quality deviations; |
|
|
ii. |
|
after the receipt of the Notice referred to in item above, the
User shall inform, as soon as possible, whether it accepts or not to receive
the Gas out of specification; it being henceforth expressly understood and
accepted that the Users failure to inform its decision within the term
stated in the Notice will be considered as the Users option not to
receive the Gas out of specification. |
|
|
iii. |
|
if it opts to receive the Gas out of specification, the
User shall be entitled to a ten percent (10%) discount on the portion of the
price pertaining to the Gas (commodity), except when the nonconformity is
only pertaining to a SCP greater than the specified; |
|
|
iv. |
|
if, however, the User opts not to receive the Gas out of
specification or fails to inform its decision and, it actually does not take said
Gas, the Failure in Supply for the non-compliance with the DRA will
deemed to have occurred, and Comgás shall bear the payment of the penalties
provided for in item 9.9.2; |
14
|
v. |
|
if the User has informed that it would reject the Gas out
of specification or fails to inform its decision, but, in spite of that, the
Gas is taken at the Delivery Point, the Failure in Supply
will be not be deemed to have occurred, and Comgás shall not be liable for
any penalties and/or liability for damages that may eventually be caused to the
equipment and facilities of the User, as well as to the Cogeneration
Plant as a result of the informed non-conformity; being preserved, however, the
right of the User to the discount referred to in subitem (iii) above. |
5.2.1 |
|
If Comgás delivers the Gas out of the specification provided for
in item 5.1, without giving prior Notice to the User of the existing
non-conformity, the following rules shall be applicable: |
|
a) |
|
If, exclusively as a result of the nonconformity presented by the
Gas and the cause-effect relation being duly evidenced, the
Cogeneration Plant suffers any damages in its equipment, then, unless the
nonconformity has occurred as a result of an Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure,
Comgás shall bear, always subject to the limit provided for in
Article Twenty, until the damages have been repaired; |
|
|
(i) |
|
with the penalties applicable for the cases of Failure in
Supply, as provided for in item 9.9.2, subject to the limit established in
item 9.9.3; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the costs determined according the procedures set forth in item
19.1.1, effectively incurred with the repair of the equipment of the
Cogeneration Plant that has evidently been damaged by the use of the
Gas out of specification, subject to the limit established in item 5.2.2
below. |
|
|
b) |
|
If the supply of Gas out of specification does not cause any
damages to the equipment of the Cogeneration Plant or if the cause-effect
relation referred to in item (a) above has not been evidenced, the Failure in
Supply shall be deemed not to have occurred, and Comgás shall not be
liable for any penalties and indemnification for the repair of damages, being
preserved, however, the right of the User to the discount referred to in
item 5.2 (iii) above which discount, however, is not enforceable if the
non-conformity has resulted from an Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure. |
15
|
c) |
|
In case of item (a) above, during the period required for repairing
the equipment of the Cogeneration Plant, the Take or Pay,
Ship or Pay and Distribution Take or Pay commitments will be
suspended. Said commitments will also be suspended during the period required for
repairing the equipment of the Cogeneration Plant in case the damage of
such equipment has occurred as a result of the occurrence of an Fortuitous
Case or Force Majeure. The period required as stated above will be determined
as per the procedure provided for in item 19.1.1. |
5.2.2 |
|
Subject to the provisions of Article Twenty, in any event, the total of payments of
Comgás set forth in item 5.2.1(a)(ii) shall exceed, during the whole
effectiveness of this Agreement, the maximum limit corresponding to five per cent
(5%) of the value of the Agreement, determined by the following formula: |
IL = K x 0.05 x DCA x N x GP, where:
|
|
|
IL is the maximum limit of payment by Comgás; |
|
|
|
|
DCA is the Daily Contracted Amount; |
|
|
|
|
N is the number of days of effectiveness of the
Agreement, calculated as of the execution
date of the Agreement up to the final
date set forth in item 13.1; |
|
|
|
|
GP is the Gas Price in force on the date of
occurrence of the event set forth in item
5.2.1(a)(ii) converted to Reais per
Cubic Meter at the Reference
Conditions according to the Exchange Rate
of the last business day of the
Month of payment of a certain
indemnification. |
|
|
|
|
K is the percentage of use of the IL, which shall
vary from 0 to 1, and, on the execution date of
this Agreement, shall correspond to 1. At
each payment made by Comgás under the
terms of item 5.2.1(a)(ii), a new K factor shall
be determined by the reduction of (i) the
percentage corresponding to such payment in
relation to the value 0.05 x DCA x N x GP from the
(ii) previous K factor. |
5.3 Irrespectively of the analyses made by the User, Comgás shall verify
the quality of the Gas supplied, by means of analyses whose results shall be forwarded to
the User in a periodicity compatible with the frequency of measurement set forth in
Ordinance ANP No. 104.
|
5.3.1 |
|
Upon the occurrence of a discrepancy between the results of quality verifications
made by the Parties, each of them shall grant free access to the other
Party in order to follow up the sampling and the analysis of the Gas,
aimed at establishing a solution for the pending matter. |
16
5.4 |
|
In case the dispute is not settled within ten (10) days as of the occurrence of the
discrepancy referred to in item 5.3.1, the dispute will be submitted to an Expert
Proceeding. |
ARTICLE SIX DELIVERY POINT AND PROPERTY TRANSFER
6.1 |
|
The Delivery Point will be located immediately downstream the outlet flange
of the Regulation and Measurement Set (CRM), which shall in turn be located in the
Users Unit located at Rua Paula Bueno, 2935 Mogi Guaçu, State of São Paulo. |
|
6.2 |
|
It is established as measurement point the Regulation and Measurement
Set (CRM) owned by Comgás, located at the Users facilities. |
|
6.3 |
|
The transfer of ownership of the Gas from Comgás to the
User will occur at the Delivery Point. |
|
6.3.1 |
|
All risks and losses of Gas: |
|
|
|
Up to the Delivery Point shall be for the account of Comgás; |
|
|
|
|
As from the Delivery Point shall be for the account of the User. |
ARTICLE SEVEN TERMS FOR DELIVERY OF GAS
7.1 |
|
The Gas will be delivered by Comgás to the User at
the Delivery Point in conformity with the quality aspects set forth in Article
Five. |
|
7.2 |
|
The supply control manometric pressure at the Delivery Point will be no
more than seventeen (17) kgf/cm2 and not less than twelve (12) kgf/cm2.
|
|
7.2.1 |
|
In special situations, the Parties may define control pressures
other than that stated in item 7.2. |
7.3 |
|
The average hourly flow shall be no more than one twenty-fourth (1/24) of the Daily
Contracted Amount DCA, provided that an increase of up to ten percent (10%) shall be
allowed. |
|
7.4 |
|
The instantaneous
flow, in Cubic Meters
per hour, shall not be more
than one twenty-fourth
(1/24) of the Scheduled Daily Amount SDA, |
17
|
|
|
provided that an increase, for periods not greater than fifteen (15) minutes a Day, of up to ten percent (10%) shall be allowed. |
|
7.5 |
The maximum delivery temperature of the Gas shall be thirty-five degrees Celsius (35ºC). |
ARTICLE EIGHT PRICE
8.1 |
|
The Price of Gas Sale (PS) at the Delivery Point to be charged by
Comgás for the exclusive purposes of Cogeneration will be comprised of the
sum of two portions: one related to the Gas Price (GP) and other related to the
Distribution Margin (DM), in accordance with their respective values at each time, so
that PS = GP + DM. |
|
8.1.1 |
|
The Gas Price (GP), in turn, is comprised of the sum of two portions: one
related to the commodity (PC) and the other related to Transportation (PT), so
that: GP = PC + PT and shall be determined and readjusted as per the methodology stated in
Annex 1. |
|
8.1.1.1 |
|
The Gas Price (GP) shall be added by the taxes levied on the purchase of
gas by Comgás in the Supplier-Comgás Agreement which are not
creditable in view of legal determination or determination of any competent
authority. |
|
8.1.2 |
|
The Distribution Margin (DM) shall be that set forth by the
Commission of Public Energy Services CSPE for the cogeneration segment stated in
Ordinance CSPE No. 366, of May 30, 2005 or any other that may replace it. |
|
8.1.2.1 |
|
Pursuant to Annex 2 of CSPE Ordinance No. 366/05, the Distribution Margin
(DM) shall be calculated in cascade, i.e., progressively for each class of
consumption, considering the amount of Gas consumed by User in the
month: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGENERATION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR SELF CONSUMPTION OR SALE TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
END CONSUMER (VARIABLE R$/m 3 with |
CLASS |
|
m 3/month |
|
PIS and COFINS and without ICMS) |
1 |
|
Up to 100,000.00 m3 |
|
|
0.1661096 |
|
2 |
|
100,000.01 through 500,000.00 m3 |
|
|
0.1314942 |
|
3 |
|
500,000.01 through 2,000,000.00 m3 |
|
|
0.1291321 |
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGENERATION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR SELF CONSUMPTION OR SALE TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
END CONSUMER (VARIABLE R$/m 3 with |
CLASS |
|
m 3/month |
|
PIS and COFINS and without ICMS) |
4 |
|
2,000,000.01 through 4,000,000.00 m3 |
|
|
0.1168830 |
|
5 |
|
4,000,000.01 through 7,000,000.00m3 |
|
|
0.1022740 |
|
6 |
|
7,000,000.01 through 10,000,000.00 m3 |
|
|
0.0876628 |
|
7 |
|
((OVER)) 10,000,000.00 m3 |
|
|
0.0727138 |
|
8.2 |
|
The Price of Gas Sale (PS) shall be added by the Tax on Operations Pertaining to the
Movement of Merchandise and on Interstate and Intermunicipality Transportation Service
Provision and Communications ICMS, under the terms of the applicable legislation, as well as
by any other federal, state and municipal taxes (taxes, fees, rates, tax and para-tax
contributions) levied or that may be levied on the operation of this Agreement. |
ARTICLE NINE SCHEDULING OF AMOUNTS TO BE TAKEN, COMMITMENTS AND PENALTIES FOR DEFAULT
9.1 |
|
Before the date of the first request of Gas, each Party
shall inform to the other, by means of Notice, a fax number to which the operating
notices shall be transmitted in relation to the performance of this Agreement. |
9.2 |
|
Scheduling of Amounts of Gas to be Taken |
|
|
|
As of the Commercial Supply Start-up, the User shall send on a
monthly basis to Comgás, with twelve (12) days in advance from the beginning of
the Month of supply, a Notice with the schedule of the amount of
Gas to be taken referring to the current Month and to the two subsequent
Months. |
|
9.2.1 |
|
The schedule referred to above shall detail the Daily Requested Amounts (DRA)
for the next Month, as well as, only for the sake of indication, the total
amounts for the two subsequent months, everything taking into account the Scheduled
Interruptions and subject to the limit of the Daily Contracted Amount
(DCA). |
|
|
9.2.2 |
|
The schedule of the Month shall detail, for the sake of indication, the
portion of the Amount Paid and Not Taken (APNT) which will be used on each
Day of that Month which will become, upon the use, the Amount
Recovered by User (ARU). Such amount may not exceed, on the daily average of that
Month, forty-four percent (44%) of the Daily Contracted Amount
(DCA), except after the end of this Agreement, when, subject to the
provisions of item 9.5.3 (b), such amount shall be a hundred per cent (100%) of that would be the old
DCA. |
19
|
9.2.3 |
|
The Daily Requested Amount (DRA) for any given day may be changed
(increased or decreased) by the User, subject to the limit of the DCA, upon
delivery of Notice to Comgás up to 8:00 a.m. (eight o clock) of the day
previous to the corresponding day of supply. |
|
|
9.2.4 |
|
Until two o clock (2:00 p.m.) of the day previous to the corresponding day of
supply, Comgás, through delivery of Notice to the User, shall
confirm the acceptance of the Daily Requested Amount, which will be
considered as the Scheduled Daily Amount. Comgás failure to make such
confirmation within the term provided for above shall be automatically considered as
acceptance of the Daily Requested Amount (DRA) by Comgás, and such DRA
shall be automatically considered SDA. |
|
|
9.2.5 |
|
Exceptionally, upon the occurrence of any operating problems that restrict the
capacity of Gas delivery, the Parties may negotiate a reduction of the
Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) for any given Day. Should the
Parties agree on such reduction, the Daily Contracted Amount
(DCA), exclusively on that Day, will be reduced to the amount of
the new Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA), not characterizing thus
Failure in Supply. |
|
|
9.2.6 |
|
If there is availability of Gas and interest of Comgás and the
User, the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) may be increased during the
Day, and the quantity so increased shall be then the Scheduled Daily Amount
(SDA) of said Day. |
9.3 |
|
Commitments of Gas Receipt (Take or Pay) |
|
|
|
Except for the situations of non-delivery or non-receipt of Gas for Failure in
Supply, Scheduled Interruptions or Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure
of either Party, the User undertakes to: |
|
a) |
|
purchase and take, on a daily basis, from Comgás no more than one hundred
and ten percent (110%) of the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA), limited to one
hundred and ten percent (110%) of the Daily Contracted Amount (DCA), and not
less than eighty percent (80%) of the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) of
Gas for the corresponding Day, subject, in case of the
noncompliance, to the penalties provided for in items 9.6 and 9.7 and respective
subitems; |
|
|
b) |
|
at every Month of the effectiveness of the Agreement,
purchase and take from Comgás and, even if it does not take, pay an
Amount of Gas that, at the daily average of the corresponding Month
is either equal to or greater than fifty-six percent (56%) of the Daily
Contracted Amount in effect referred to by Article Four; |
20
|
c) |
|
at every Year of the effectiveness of the Agreement,
purchase and take from Comgás and, even if it does not take, pay an
Amount of Gas that, at the daily average of the corresponding Year
is either equal to or greater than eighty percent (80%) of the Daily
Contracted Amount (DCA) in effect referred to by Article Four; |
|
9.3.1 |
|
The percentages referred to in subitems (b) and (c) of item 9.3 correspond to the
monthly and annual Take or Pay commitments, whose compliance will be verified by
taking into account only the Daily Taken Amount (DTA) such as defined in
item 9.4. |
9.4 |
|
Daily Taken Amount (DTA) |
|
|
|
The Daily Taken Amount (DTA) will be determined by the formula: |
|
|
|
DTA = QM ARU |
|
|
|
where : |
|
|
|
DTA Is the Daily Taken Amount; |
|
|
|
QM Is the Measured Amount at CRM on the respective Day; and |
|
|
|
ARU Is the Amount Recovered by the User on the respective Day. |
|
9.4.1 |
|
The sum, in the Month, of the Daily Taken Amounts (DTAs)
will be used as parameter for purposes of determination of the Amount Not Taken in the
Month (ANTM) and the Amount Not Taken of the Year
(ANTy), pursuant to item 9.5. |
9.5 |
|
Amounts Not Taken Determination |
|
|
|
The Amounts Not Taken (ANTs) of Gas to be paid by the User
to Comgás in view of the provisions of subitems (b) and (c) of item 9.3 shall
be calculated according to the following formulas: |
|
a) |
|
amount to be paid in each Month: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) |
|
amount to be paid in each Year: |
|
|
|
|
|
21
where:
|
|
|
|
|
ANTM
|
|
-
|
|
is the Amount of Gas not Taken in the
Month, being zero if the calculation result is negative; |
|
M
|
|
-
|
|
is the number of Days of the Month of supply; |
|
PPM
|
|
-
|
|
is the total number of days (or a fraction thereof) corresponding
to Scheduled Interruptions in the Month, at the
proportion in which they have affected the receipt or the regular
supply of Gas at the Delivery Point |
|
PPPY
|
|
|
|
is the total number of Days (or a fraction thereof)
corresponding to Scheduled Interruptions exclusively
from Comgás in the Year, at the proportion in
which they have adversely affected the regular supply of the
Gas at the Delivery Point; |
|
DCA
|
|
-
|
|
is the Daily Contracted Amount effective in the
Month and/or Year of supply, receptively for
subitems (a) and (b) of this item; |
|
QNFFj
|
|
-
|
|
is the portion of the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) which
has not been taken on day j for a reason of Failure in
Supply; |
|
QNFMj
|
|
-
|
|
is the portion of the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) which
has not been taken on day j due to an Act of God or a
Force Majeure Event; |
|
DTAj
|
|
-
|
|
is the Daily Taken Amount on day j; |
|
ANTY
|
|
-
|
|
is the Amount Not Taken of Gas in the
Year, being zero if the calculation result is negative; |
|
Y
|
|
-
|
|
is the number of the Days in the Year of supply. |
|
9.5.1 |
|
Payments for Amounts Not Taken |
|
The amount to be paid by the User to Comgás as Amount Not
Taken (Take or Pay) shall be: |
|
(a) |
|
at every Month, the product of the ANTM
(Amount Not Taken in the Month) by the value of the portion pertaining to
the commodity of the Gas Price in effect at the end of the last day of
the Month of supply, added by the taxes due, as provided for in the
applicable legislation. |
|
|
(b) |
|
at every Year, the product of the ANTY
(Amount Not Taken in the Year) by the value of the portion pertaining to
the commodity of the Gas Price in effect at the end of the last day of
the Year of supply, added by the taxes due, as provided for in the
applicable legislation.
|
22
|
|
|
The amounts referred to in item 9.5.1 shall be paid by the User within the
same term and according to the same rules and further conditions set forth in Article
Eleven for the payment of Gas invoices pertaining to the invoicing period. |
|
9.5.2 |
|
Amount Paid and Not Taken (APNT) |
|
|
|
|
Once the payment of each of the amounts referred to in item 9.5.1 has been made, the
corresponding Amount Not Taken (ANT) will be added to the Amount Paid and
Not Taken of the corresponding Year (APNTy), being the total APNTy
on the first moment of the Year equal to zero. |
|
9.5.3 |
|
Recovery of Amounts Paid and Not Taken |
|
|
|
|
The User may recover, in whole or in part upon Notice as per
item 9.2.2, always for consumption at the Cogeneration Plant, the remainder of
the Amounts Paid and Not Taken (APNTs) of Gas (commodity),
as follows: |
|
a) |
|
during the effectiveness of the Agreement, including any
possible extension pursuant to item 13.1: |
|
(i) |
|
up to the last Month of the seventh
(7th) Year subsequent to the Year of
verification of the Amount Paid and Not Taken of a certain
Year (APNTy); |
|
|
(ii) |
|
on the condition that it has already requested and
taken, in the Month in which there is the recovery, an Amount
of Gas corresponding, at least, to the monthly Take or Pay
commitment; |
|
b) |
|
after the end of the term established in the Article Thirteen,
including its eventual extension pursuant to Article Thirteen: except for the
event of termination caused by the User or for its fault: |
|
(i) |
|
up to the limit of the DCA or to such limit that may be
agreed by Comgás and the User; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
up to the term of three hundred and sixty five (365)
days following the end of the Agreement, pursuant to item 13.1.1. |
|
9.5.3.1 |
|
The portion taken by the User of the remainder of Amounts Paid and
Not Taken (APNTs) will be referred to as Amount Recovered by the
User (ARU) and will be, at the time of such
recovery, deducted from the said remainder, by order, from the oldest to the
most recent APNTY.
|
23
|
9.5.3.2 |
|
For the Amount Recovered by the User (ARU), the User shall pay
to Comgás the portion corresponding to the taxes levied, under the terms of
the applicable legislation. |
|
|
9.5.3.3 |
|
For the Amounts Recovered by the User (ARUs) in accordance with item
9.5.3(b), the User shall also pay to Comgás the portion of the
Gas Price pertaining to the transportation of the entire volume recovered in
the Month or ninety-five percent (95%) of what would be the Daily
Contracted Amount (DCA), whichever is higher, with all taxes levied thereon. |
|
|
9.5.3.4 |
|
After the deadlines referred to in subitems (a) and (b) of item 9.5.3 or after the
termination of the Agreement by Comgás as a result of a default by
the User, the balance of the Amount Paid and Not Taken will be
considered as having been extinguished, whether there is a remainder or not, and the
User will not have any right of recovery. In case of termination of the
Agreement by the User for a default by Comgás or in case
of termination under the terms of item 17.5(a), Comgás shall pay to the
User the amounts provided for in item 17.4.1(ii). |
|
|
9.5.3.5 |
|
In the event of termination of the Agreement under the terms provided for
in item 17.5(b): |
|
(a) |
|
the remainder of the Amount Paid and Not Taken
(APNT) of Gas will be considered as being extinguished,
whether there is a remainder or not, and the User will not have
any right of recovery, in case the termination of the Agreement
pursuant to said item 17.5(b) results from unilateral decision by the
User or from a default of the User; |
|
|
(b) |
|
the amount corresponding to the possible residual
amount of the Amount Paid and Not Taken (APNT) of Gas
will be paid by Comgás to the User, as
provided for in item 17.4.1(ii), if the termination of the
Agreement pursuant to said item 17.5(b) results from unilateral
decision of Comgás or from a default of Comgás. |
9.6 |
|
Penalty for Amount Taken in Excess of Schedule |
|
|
|
If, on any given Day, the User takes an Amount of Gas exceeding
by more than ten percent (10%) the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) for that
Day, or ten percent (10%) of the Daily Contracted Amount (DCA)
in effect, whichever is lower, then it shall pay to Comgás, unless if agreed upon between the
Parties, in addition to the regular invoicing: |
24
|
i) |
|
a penalty in the amount determined by the following formula: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PATES
|
|
=
|
|
0.30 [(QM-QL) x PC + QT x PT], where: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PATES
|
|
-
|
|
Is the amount, on the Day, of the penalty for Amount Taken in
Excess of Schedule to be paid by the User to
Comgás; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QM
|
|
-
|
|
is the Measured Amount on such Day; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QL
|
|
-
|
|
is the lowest Amount of Gas established below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the SDA for that Day added by ten percent (10%) or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the DCA added by ten percent (10%); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC
|
|
-
|
|
is the amount of the portion pertaining to the commodity in the Gas
Price in effect on the last Day of the Month in
which the User has taken a quantity of Gas higher than
the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA), already expressed in
R$/m3, considering the Exchange Rate of the last
business day of the same Month; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QT
|
|
-
|
|
is an Amount of Gas expressed in m3, whose amount is: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equal to the difference between Measured Amount
(QM) and the smallest Amount of Gas among the following: 110%
of the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) or 110% of the
Daily Contracted Amount (DCA), if 110% of the Scheduled Daily
Amount (SDA) of such Day is greater than 95% of the
Daily Contracted Amount
(DCA); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equal to QM 95% of the DCA, if 110% of the SDA of that
Day is lower than 95% of the DCA and QM is greater than 95% of
the DCA; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
equal to zero, in the other events; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PT
|
|
-
|
|
is the amount of the portion pertaining to the transportation in the
Gas Price in effect on the last Day of the
Month in which the User has taken Amounts of Gas
greater than the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA), already
expressed in R$/m3, considering the
Exchange Rate of the last business day of the
same Month. |
|
9.6.1 |
|
Without prejudice to the provisions of item 9.6, if the User fails to
comply with the limits specified in said item, and that implies risk to the operation of
the distribution system, Comgás may limit the flow in the Regulation and
Measurement Set (CRM), upon prior notice to the User. |
|
|
9.6.2 |
|
The payment of the penalty referred to in item 9.6 will be made on the maturity date
of the invoices pertaining to the concerned Month as
provided for in item 11.4 and the User shall be subject, in case of
non-payment within such term, to the same additions and other rules applicable to the
invoices paid in delay, pursuant to Article Eleven. |
25
9.7 Penalty for Amount Taken Below Schedule
|
|
|
If, on any given day, the User takes an Amount of Gas lower than eighty
percent (80%) of the Scheduled Daily Amount for that Day, it shall pay to
Comgás, as of the second event in any given Month, or as of the seventh
event in a certain Year, in addition to the regular invoicing, a penalty in the
amount determined by the following formula: |
|
|
|
|
|
PATBS
|
=
|
(0.80x SDA QM) x B x PC, where: |
|
|
|
|
|
Patbs
|
-
|
is the limit amount, on the day, of the Penalty for Amount Taken Below
Schedule to be paid by the User to Comgás; |
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
-
|
the amount of B shall depend on the percentage of deviation to be produced
between the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA) and the amount actually
taken, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ If QM ³ (0.80 x SDA), then B = 0 ; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ If QM < (0.80 x SDA) and QM ³ (0.75 x SDA), then B = 0.05; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ If QM < (0.75 x SDA) and QM ³ (0.70 x SDA), then B = 0.10; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ If QM < (0.70 x SDA), then B = 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
QM
|
-
|
Is the Measured Amount on such Day; |
|
|
|
|
|
SDA
|
-
|
Is the Scheduled Daily Amount for that Day; |
|
|
|
|
|
PC
|
-
|
is the amount of the portion pertaining to the commodity in
the Gas Price in effect on the last day of the Month in
which the User has taken the Amount of Gas lower
than the Scheduled Daily Amount (SDA), already expressed
in R$/m3, considering the Exchange
Rate of the last business day of the month. |
|
9.7.1 |
|
The payment of the penalty referred to in item 9.7 will be made on the maturity date
of the invoices pertaining to the concerned Month as provided for in
item 11.4 and the User shall be subject, in case of non-payment within such
term, to the same additions and other rules applicable to the invoices paid in delay,
pursuant to Article Eleven. |
9.8 Payment Commitment of Firm Transportation and Distribution Margin
|
9.8.1 |
|
On a monthly basis, the User shall pay to Comgás, within the term
set forth in item 11.4, the product of the portion pertaining to the |
|
|
|
transportation of the Gas Price (PT) by the greater amount between
the following (QT) added by the taxes levied, as provided for in the applicable
legislation: |
26
|
i. |
|
the sum, in the Month, of the Daily Taken Amount
(DTA) plus the Amount Recovered by the User (ARU). |
|
|
ii. |
|
the product of ninety-five percent (95%) ¾ Ship or
Pay ¾ of the Daily Contracted Amount (DCA) by the number of
Days of the corresponding Month, deducted from this calculation
the situations of non-delivery or non-receipt of Gas for
Failure in Supply, Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure by
either Party and/or Scheduled Interruption by Supplier
and/or Comgás, in the proportion that they have adversely affected
the receipt or the regular supply of Gas at the Delivery Point. |
|
9.8.2 |
|
On a monthly basis, the User shall pay to Comgás, within the term
set forth in item 11.4, the product of the portion pertaining to the Distribution
Margin by the greater among between the following (QT) added by the taxes levied,
as provided for in the applicable legislation: |
|
i. |
|
the sum, in the Month, of the Daily Taken Amount
(DTA) plus the Amount Recovered by the User (ARU). |
|
|
ii. |
|
the product of eighty percent (80%) of the Daily
Contracted Amount (DCA) the Distribution Take or Pay by the
number of Days of the corresponding Month, deducted from this
calculation the situations of non-delivery or non-receipt of Gas
for Failure in Supply, Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure by
either Party and/or Comgás Scheduled Interruption or the
Suppliers Scheduled Interruptions, in the proportion it has adversely
affected the receipt or the regular supply of Gas at the Delivery
Point. |
9.9 Gas Supply Commitment
|
9.9.1 |
|
Comgás undertakes to accept the Daily Requested Amounts (DRA) as
Scheduled Daily Amounts (SDA), as well as to make available to the
User, at the Delivery Point, at every Day, an Amount of
Gas equal to the Daily Requested Amount (DRA) for the corresponding
Day. |
|
9.9.1.1 |
|
Comgás is released from its obligation to accept, as Daily Requested
Amount (DRA), Daily Requested Amounts (DRA) that are
incompatible with situations of Comgás and/or Suppliers
Scheduled Interruptions. |
27
|
9.9.2 |
|
In the event of proven Failure in Supply, Comgás shall pay to the
User, as the sole and enforceable compensation, the amount determined by the
following formula, always subject to the limit set forth in item 9.9.3 below: |
|
|
|
|
Md = 0.15 x GP x QF |
|
|
|
|
where: |
|
|
|
|
Md daily fine, in national currency; |
|
|
|
|
QF Missing Amount on the Day on which there was a Failure in Supply; |
|
|
|
|
GP Gas Price at the Delivery Point, pursuant to item 8.1.1 of
Article Eight, in effect in the Month. |
|
9.9.2.1 |
|
The payment of the penalty referred to by item 9.9.2 shall be made on the
maturity date of the invoices pertaining to the concerned Month as provided
for in item 11.4 the User shall be subject, in case of non-payment within
such term, to the same additions and other rules applicable to the invoices paid in
delay, pursuant to Article Eleven. |
|
9.9.3 |
|
Under no circumstance, the total of payments by Comgás as a result of
Failure in Supply may exceed, in each Year, the non-cumulative limits
specified below, subject to the provisions of Article Twenty. |
|
(i) |
|
in case the Failure in Supply is the result of a
failure in supply by the Supplier in the Supplier-Comgás
Agreement: limit corresponding to 3,285,000 m 3 multiplied by the Gas
Price in effect, converted to Reais per Cubic Meters,
calculated according to the following formula: |
|
|
|
|
|
IL
|
|
=
|
|
K x 3,285,000 x GP, where |
|
IL
|
|
-
|
|
is the maximum limit of payment by Comgás
in case of Failure in Supply
resulting from a failure in supply by the
Supplier in the Supplier-Comgás
Agreement; |
|
GP
|
|
-
|
|
is the Gas Price in force on the date
of occurrence of each Failure in Supply
converted to Reais per Cubic
Meter at the Reference Conditions
according to the Exchange Rate of
the last business day of the Month of
payment of an indemnification. |
|
K
|
|
|
|
is the percentage of use of the IL, which shall
vary from 0 to 1, and, on the execution date of
this Agreement and on the beginning of
each Year, shall correspond to 1. At
each payment made by Comgás for
Failure in Supply, a new K factor shall
be determined by the reduction of (i) the
percentage corresponding to such payment in
relation to the value 3,285,000 x GP from the
(ii) previous K factor. |
28
|
(ii) |
|
in case the Failure in Supply is exclusively attributable to
Comgás: limit corresponding to 3,285,000 m 3 multiplied by the Gas
Price in effect, converted to Reais per Cubic Meters,
calculated according to the following formula: |
|
|
|
|
|
IL
|
|
=
|
|
K x 3,285,000 x GP, where |
|
IL
|
|
-
|
|
is the maximum limit of payment by Comgás
in case of Failure in Supply
exclusively of Comgás; |
|
|
|
|
|
GP
|
|
-
|
|
is the Gas Price in force on the date
of occurrence of each Failure in Supply
converted to Reais per Cubic
Meter at the Reference Conditions
according to the Exchange Rate of
the last business day of the Month of
payment of an indemnification. |
|
|
|
|
|
K
|
|
|
|
is the percentage of use of the IL, which shall
vary from 0 to 1, and, on the execution date of
this Agreement and on the beginning of
each Year, shall correspond to 1. At
each payment made by Comgás for
Failure in Supply, a new K factor shall
be determined by the reduction of (i) the
percentage corresponding to such payment in
relation to the value 3,285,000 x GP from the
(ii) previous K factor. |
|
9.9.3.1 |
|
The Parties agree that the indemnification limits provided for in
item 9.9.3 above are exclusively established for each Year and are not
cumulative with the limits of other Years. Therefore, any possible balance
of the indemnification limit of any given Year, which has not been used for
such Year, will not be added to the indemnification limits of the
subsequent Year. |
ARTICLE TEN COMMITMENT OF PRIORITY OF PURCHASE OF DAILY CONTRACTED AMOUNT (DCA) OF THE
AGREEMENT AND GAS USAGE RESTRICTION
10.1 |
|
Priority of Acquisition of Daily Contracted Amount (DCA) of
the Agreement |
|
10.1.1 |
|
The User agrees that the supply of Gas, subject of this
Agreement, will have priority in relation to any other supply of piped gas to the
Cogeneration Plant which it may possibly request to Comgás until the
Daily Contracted Amount (DCA) set forth in this Agreement is
reached. |
|
|
10.1.2 |
|
If the User consumes gas from other agreement in violation with the provisions
of 10.1.1 above, the User shall pay to Comgás, as penalty, the amount
calculated by the formula P = GP x QT, where: |
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P |
|
- |
|
is the amount of the penalty pertaining to the Day; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GP |
|
- |
|
is the total unit price of the Gas at the Delivery Point in effect on the
last day of the month of occurrence of the fact generating the penalty, converted into
Reais per Cubic Meter at the Reference Conditions, according to
the Exchange Rate of the day prior to the payment day to Comgás. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QT |
|
- |
|
is the Amount of Gas (expressed in Cubic Meters at the Reference
Conditions) taken on the Day by the User which is not the
Gas subject of this Agreement, limited to the difference
[DCA QR QFF], in which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCA
|
|
-
|
|
Is the Daily Contracted Amount; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QR
|
|
-
|
|
Is the Amount of Gas subject
of this Agreement which has
been used on that Day by the
User; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QFF
|
|
-
|
|
Is the Amount of Gas which, on
that Day, has been subject of
proven Failure in Supply; |
|
10.1.3 |
|
The payment of the penalty referred to by item 10.1.2 shall be made on the maturity
date of the invoices pertaining to the supply of Gas of the concerned Month
the User shall be subject, in case of non-payment within such term, to the
same additions and other rules applicable to the Gas supply invoices paid in
delay, pursuant to Article Eleven of this Agreement. |
|
|
10.1.4 |
|
The payment obligation of the penalty referred to in item 10.1.2 will be irrespectively
of all the other obligations under the Agreement, including the Take or
Pay, Ship or Pay and Distribution Take or Pay obligations and the
payment of the full price for any amount of Gas supplied at the Delivery
Point. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Gas Usage Restriction |
|
|
10.2.1 |
|
The User agrees that all the Gas subject of this Agreement
shall be consumed at the Cogeneration Plant. |
|
|
10.2.2 |
|
If the User destines any Amount of Gas to any other use(s) in
violation with the provisions above, the User shall pay to Comgás, as a
penalty, the amount corresponding to the product of such Amount of Gas by seventy
percent (70%) of its total unit price (PS) at the Delivery Point in effect on the
last Day of the month of occurrence of the fact generating the penalty. |
30
|
10.2.3 |
|
The payment of the penalty referred to by item 10.2.2 shall be made on the maturity
date of the invoices pertaining to the supply of Gas of the concerned Month
as provided for in item 11.4 the User shall be subject, in case
of non-payment within such a term, to the same additions and other rules
applicable to the Gas supply invoices paid in delay, pursuant to Article
Eleven of this Agreement. |
|
|
10.2.4 |
|
The payment obligation of the penalty referred to in item 10.2.2 will be
irrespectively of all the other penalties and obligations of the
Agreement, including the ones related to termination, Take or Pay,
Ship or Pay, Distribution Take or Pay and the obligation to pay the full price of
the totality of Gas supplied at the Delivery Point. |
ARTICLE ELEVEN INVOICING, PAYMENT MANNER AND GUARANTEE
11.1
Amounts to Be Invoiced
|
11.1.1 |
|
Portion Pertaining to the Commodity: |
|
|
|
For the supply of Gas (commodity), the invoicing amount will be determined
by the application of the following formula: |
|
|
|
|
|
FC
|
-
|
is the amount of the invoicing of the commodity in each period of invoicing to be paid by the User
on the maturity date defined pursuant to item 11.4; |
|
|
|
|
|
DTAj
|
-
|
is the Daily Taken Amount on day j; |
|
|
|
|
|
PC
|
-
|
is the unit amount of the portion pertaining to the commodity added by the taxes and converted
into national currency per Cubic Meter at the Reference Conditions in accordance with
the Exchange Rate of the last business day of the Month of supply; |
|
|
|
|
|
K
|
-
|
is the first Day of Gas supply in the invoicing period; |
|
|
|
|
|
J
|
-
|
is each one of the Days of Gas supply in the concerned invoicing period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
-
|
corresponds to the last Day of Gas supply in the concerned invoicing period; |
|
|
|
|
|
DFc
|
-
|
is the supplementary amount of the invoicing of the commodity pertaining to the previous supply period,
calculated by means of the difference between (i) the amount ascertained in accordance with the
Exchange Rate published on the business days previous to the 25th day of the Month
of supply and (ii) the amount invoiced in the previous period being deducted therefrom the
supplementary amount of the DFc previously applied. |
31
|
11.1.2 |
|
Portion Pertaining to the Transportation |
|
|
|
In relation to the Gas transportation, the invoicing amount will be
determined by means of the application of the following formula: |
where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
FT
|
-
|
|
is the invoicing amount pertaining to the transportation
in each period of invoicing, to be paid by the
User on the maturity date as defined pursuant to
item 11.4; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
QT
|
-
|
|
is the Amount of Gas defined pursuant to item 9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PT
|
-
|
|
is the amount of the portion pertaining to the
transportation of the Gas Price in force on the
Month of supply and converted into national
currency per Cubic Meter at the Reference
Conditions by the Exchange Rate of the last
business day of the Month of
supply. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DFt
|
-
|
|
is the supplementary amount of the invoicing of the
transportation pertaining to the previous supply period,
calculated by means of the difference between (i) the
amount ascertained in accordance with the Exchange
Rate published on the business day previous to the
25th day of the Month of
supply and (ii) the amount invoiced in the previous
period being deducted therefrom the supplementary amount
of the DFt previously applied. |
|
11.1.3 |
|
Portion pertaining to the Distribution Margin |
|
|
|
|
In relation to Comgás Distribution Margin, the invoicing amount shall be
as established hereinafter: |
where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fm
|
-
|
|
is the invoicing amount pertaining to the Distribution Margin in each Month of
invoicing, to be paid by the User on the maturity date as defined pursuant to item 11.4; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
QMi
|
-
|
|
is the Amount Measured on Day i, in m3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
-
|
|
is the last Day of Gas supply in the Month or the considered supply
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mg
|
-
|
|
is the Distribution Margin calculated as defined in items 8.1.2 and 8.1.2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
-
|
|
is each one of the Days of Gas supply in the Month or period of
invoicing considered |
32
|
11.1.4 |
|
Portion Pertaining to the Amount Not Taken |
|
|
|
|
In relation to the Amount Not Taken, the invoicing amount shall be
determined by the application of the formulas provided for in item 9.5. |
11.2 |
|
- Periodicity of Invoicing and other Collections. |
|
|
|
Invoicing shall be made on a monthly basis, and each Month shall correspond to a
Gas supply period. The other Collection Documents shall be issued with
the same periodicity, without prejudice to the provisions of item 11.3. |
11.3 |
|
Submission of Bill of Sales and Collection Documents |
|
|
|
Comgás shall submit to the User the bill of sales and the Collection
Documents up to the tenth (10th) day of the Month following the
Month to which they refer and up to the tenth (10th) day of the first
Month of the subsequent Year for the invoicing related to annual Take
or Pay. The failure by Comgás to submit the Collection Documents
within the established term shall result in the extension of the maturity date for a
period equivalent to the delay. |
11.4 |
|
Collection Documents Maturity Dates |
|
|
|
The amounts of the Collection Documents shall be paid in the country legal currency,
by way of credit into the current account of Comgás (to be previously informed), up
to the twenty-fifth (25th) day of the month following the Month to which
they refer, or, if such is not a business day, on the first (1st ) subsequent
business day. |
|
11.4.1 |
|
In case of delay in the delivery of the Collection Document, the maturity date
shall be extended for a term identical to the number of days of delay, remaining
applicable, however, the original dates set forth in items 11.1.1 and 11.1.2 for the
determination of the Exchange Rate. |
|
|
11.4.2 |
|
The Collection Document(s) shall be issued by Comgás, in the name of: |
|
|
|
|
Corn Products Brasil Ingredientes Industriais Ltda |
|
|
|
|
Rua Paula Bueno, 2935 |
|
|
|
|
Mogi Guaçu SP CEP 13841-010 |
|
|
11.4.3 |
|
Comgás shall include into each invoice the calculation of any penalties due by
the User in accordance with Article Nine. |
33
11.5 |
|
Compensation of Fines Imposed by the User to Comgás |
|
|
|
In the event Comgás has incurred in any fines properly notified and charged by way
of a Collection Document issued by the User, its amount, if acknowledged by
Comgás, may be used by the User to set-off its debt towards Comgás
in the Month of payment. |
|
11.5.1 |
|
In the event the total of fines referred to by item 11.5 is higher than the debt of the
User towards Comgás in any given Month, the difference in favor
of the User shall be credited by Comgás into a current account of the
User, to be timely informed, on the same maturity date of the invoice pertaining
to the Gas which has been supplied in the Month of occurrence of the
fact generating the fine. |
11.6 |
|
Late Payment Charges |
|
|
|
The payments made in delay shall be updated by the accumulated variation of the IGP-M/FGV
(General Index of Market Prices, published by Fundação Getúlio Vargas) ¾ or any other
index that may replace it and added by interest of one percent (1%) per month, everything
on a pro rata tempore basis, considering the period between the effective payment date and
the maturity date, in addition to a fine of two percent (2%) on the updated principal amount.
If the IGP-M/FGV is extinguished and not officially replaced by any other index, the
Parties shall agree, within the term of fifteen (15) days, on a new index for the
same purpose. |
|
11.6.1 |
|
If within the term of fifteen (15) days the Parties fail to reach an agreement
on the index to be used in replacement of the IGP-M/FGV, the dispute shall be settled by
an Expert. |
11.7 |
|
Error in Collection Document. |
|
|
|
In the event that an error is found in the amount of a Collection Document,
whether a shortfall or an excess, Comgás shall make the appropriate
correction for set-off in the next succeeding month. In case of an error in the amount of a
Collection Document, the User may notify Comgás within three (3)
days after the receipt of the Collection Document, requiring Comgás to
correct the error and reissue the Collection Document. If the Collection
Document is corrected in 3 days and delivered to the User within such term,
it shall be settled within the original term. If the corrected Collection Document
is delivered to the User after 3 days, it shall be settled by the
User within twenty (20) days as of the receipt of the corrected Collection
Document. |
34
11.8 |
|
Disputed Collections |
|
|
|
In case any amount charged by one Party to the other in any Collection
Document is disputed, the following procedures shall be applied: |
|
a) |
|
The disputing Party ( Disputing Party) shall give notice
of such dispute to the other Party (Non-Disputing Party) on or before the
due date of the Collection Document, describing in detail the disputed
amount, the reasons for its disagreement, the alternative adopted in relation to the
amount charged, in addition to any other elements it deems important in order to
settle the dispute; |
|
|
b) |
|
The Non-Disputing Party shall make the payment of the total amount
charged on a timely basis, informing the portion subject to potential refund. |
|
|
c) |
|
If the Non-Disputing Party agrees with the Disputing Party,
the Non-Disputing Party shall give notice to the Disputing Party of
its agreement and refund the latter, within the maximum term of fifteen (15) days, the
disputed amount, in case such amount was paid subject to potential refund. |
|
|
d) |
|
If the Non-Disputing Party does not agree with the Disputing
Party, then the Non-Disputing Party shall give notice to the
Disputing Party of its disagreement and the dispute shall be immediately
submitted to an Arbitration Tribunal, unless the Parties decide to
submit the dispute first to an Expert. |
|
11.8.1 |
|
If, at any time, a Party waives or reconsider its opinion with respect to a
dispute, such Party may, as the case may be: |
|
i. |
|
refund to the other Party the amount paid subject to
potential refund, added by the charges provided for in item 11.8.1.2; |
|
|
ii. |
|
release any amount paid subject to potential refund from such
condition; |
|
|
iii. |
|
pay the costs and expenses incurred so far with the procedures of
Arbitration or Expert Proceeding. |
|
11.8.1.1 |
|
Said waiver or review shall be formally notified to the other Party and
to the president of the Arbitration Tribunal or Expert, and the
controversy shall be extinguished. |
|
|
11.8.1.2 |
|
The Party which, upon decision by the Arbitration Tribunal or
the Expert, shall be required to return the amount paid subject to the
potential refund, shall also pay to the other
Party the corresponding financial charges on the previously disputed amount, the total of
which shall be calculated in view of: |
35
|
i. |
|
the time elapsed from the maturity of the debt or
since its payment subject to potential refund; |
|
|
ii. |
|
the monthly charge corresponding to the variation of
the IGPM-FGV, plus one percent (1%) per month. |
11.9 |
|
Payment Guarantee |
|
|
|
As guarantee to the fulfillment of all of its obligations provided for in the
Agreement, specially the payment obligations by the User of any amount
owed under this Agreement, the User shall deliver to Comgás a
Guarantee consisting in a bank letter of credit, in a form acceptable to
Comgás, issued by a financial institution acceptable to Comgás, in the
amount corresponding to 90 multiplied by the Daily Contracted Amount multiplied by
the Gas Sale Price. The guarantee shall be delivered by the User to
Comgás in the event of, in any Year, the sum of days in delay of payment
by the User is equal to more than 10 days or in the event there are more than 2
events of delay of payment by the User. The User shall deliver the
guarantee to Comgás within thirty (30) days counted as of the date on which the
obligation to deliver the guarantee had been constituted, in the terms provided above. |
|
11.9.1 |
|
The Guarantee shall be valid and effective in its full amount until the
full compliance with all obligations of the User provided in this
Agreement. |
|
11.9.1.1 |
|
In case the GUARANTY has a term of existence shorter than the date of full
compliance with all the USERs payment obligations as set forth herein, the USER shall
renew the GUARANTY or deliver a new GUARANTY according to the AGREEMENT, up to thirty
(30) days before the end of its effectiveness. In case the USER does not renew the
GUARANTY or does not delivery a new GUARANTY to COMGÁS within the above stated term,
COMGÁS may enforce the existing GUARANTY to cover any amounts due by the user and/ or
suspend the supply of GAS to the USER until the GUARANTY has been renewed, or until a
new GUARANTY is delivered to COMGÁS. |
36
|
11.9.2 |
|
In case of change or adjustment in the Gas Sale Price, the User shall
(i) update the value of the Guarantee within the maximum term of thirty (30) days
counted as of the date on which the change or update had occurred and (ii) deliver the
updated version of the bank letter of credit to Comgás within such term. |
|
|
11.9.3 |
|
In case the Guarantee granted by the User is used by
Comgás, in the terms set forth in item 17.1, the User shall renew the
Guarantee, in the value and terms established in item 11.9, within the maximum
term of thirty (30) days counted as of the date of its use. |
ARTICLE TWELVE MEASUREMENT
12.1 Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the
Parties agree to use the measurement units of the International Unit System SI.
12.2 The measurements of Gas delivered to the User shall be made in
the Measurement System integrating the CRM, as follows:
|
i. |
|
the volume unit shall be the Cubic Meter; |
|
|
ii. |
|
the local atmospheric pressure value (for Campinas and Region, Patm = 0.93
kgf/cm 2) shall be assumed as being constant during the effectiveness of the
Agreement, if such an amount is required for converting the volume into the
Base Conditions; |
|
|
iii. |
|
the calorific power shall be determined by calculation, based on ISO Rule
6976, as from the composition of the Gas determined by chromatography based
on ISO Rule 6974; |
|
|
iv. |
|
the measured volumes shall be expressed at the Base Conditions. |
|
12.2.1 |
|
The measurement signal, if any, shall be made available by Comgás if requested
by the User. |
12.3 |
|
- The measurement of the total volume of Gas supplied to the User shall be
made by the instruments of the Measurement System installed at CRM at the
Delivery Point. Comgás shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance,
calibration and adjustments of the Measurement System installed at CRM. |
|
12.4 |
|
- The ascertainment of the total volume of Gas supplied to the User shall be made by the
Comgás, by applying the following procedures, depending on the type of Measurement System that
is installed at CRM: |
37
|
i. |
|
orifice meter: procedures described in API-MPMS 14.3 (Natural Gas Fluids
Measurement Concentric, Square-Edged Orifice Meters); |
|
|
ii. |
|
turbine meter: procedures described in INMETRO Ordinance No. 114, of 1997, or
in ABNT ISO Rule 9951; |
|
|
iii. |
|
ultra-sonic meter: procedures described in AGA Report No. 9 (Measurement of
Gas by Multipath Ultrasonic Meters); |
|
|
iv. |
|
other meter: as agreed in advance by the Parties. |
|
12.4.1 |
|
For the Measurement Systems indicated in item 12.4, the compressibility factor
shall be calculated pursuant to ISO 12 213 (Compressibility Factors of Natural Gas and
Other Related Hydrocarbon Gases). |
12.5 |
|
- The calibration and adjustments of CRM shall always be made by Comgás,
Notice given to the User no less than five (5) days in advance, so
as to allow the User, if it so wishes, to send a representative in order to
follow up the works. |
|
12.5.1 |
The User shall always provide access to Comgás or any third
parties accompanied by Comgás to CRM. |
12.6 |
|
The period between two calibrations and successive ordinary adjustments of the CRMs
Measurement System, as of the Commercial Supply Start-up, shall be of 1
year. The other calibration procedures are to be agreed upon between the
Parties. |
|
12.7 |
|
The User may, upon delivery of a Notice to Comgás, request an
extra calibration of any instrument integrating the CRMs Measurement System, on
which case the corresponding costs shall be fully borne by the User, if the
instrument is considered adjusted, or by Comgás, if the instrument is considered out
of adjustment. Comgás undertakes to make the calibration within the lowest possible
term. The instruments of the CRMs Measurement System that, after the calibration,
present measurement errors not greater than the value of one point five percent (1.5%), either
upwards or downwards, as a reference, shall be considered adjusted. |
|
12.8 |
|
In case, after the calibration of the CRMs Measurement System, such calibration
indicates that the Measurement System was not adjusted, i.e., it is evidenced that
the Measurement System had a deviation in the measured amount greater than 1.5%,
either upwards or downwards, the respective correction factor shall be technically determined
by Comgás; and the User shall be allowed to follow up the works. |
|
12.8.1 |
|
No correction shall be applicable in the cases in which the measurement error of any
given component of the CRMs Measurement System is lower than those stated in
item 12.7 above. |
38
|
12.8.2 |
|
Once the period in which the CRMs Measurement System had presented measurement
errors above the ones permitted is perfectly defined, corrections of value equal to the
deviation verified shall be applied, either upwards or downwards, on the amounts actually
registered in that period by the Measurement Systems. |
|
|
12.8.3 |
|
If the period in which the CRMs Measurement System was out of calibration is
unknown, the corrections referred to in item 12.8.2 shall be applied on the amounts
actually recorded by the Measurement Systems in the past forty-five (45) Days
of consumption or in the last half of the period of time between the two latest
calibrations of the Measurement System, whichever is the lower period of time. |
12.9 |
|
If, on any given day, there is a dispute as regards the Amounts of Gas made
available at the CRM or failure in the CRM, including removal of any of its
components for maintenance, without interruption in the supply of Gas the daily
volume of Gas supplied in relation to such Day shall be determined
as follows, in order of preference: |
|
a) |
|
in the measurement systems of gas of the Cogeneration Plant in the period,
if any, provided that access by Comgás and any third parties accompanied by
Comgás to the measurement instruments installed at the Cogeneration
Plant, as well as to the information referring to their calibration, is allowed.
For purposes of using such resource, Comgás shall previously inspect and
approve, based on the metrological legislation in effect and the technical rules
applicable, the use of such measurement instruments for that purpose. |
|
|
b) |
|
based on the measurements made in any other Comgás Measurement
Systems by difference, if, as from the difference, it is possible to calculate,
on a safety way, said volume of Gas taken by the User; |
|
|
c) |
|
indirectly calculated, if possible, based on the electric energy and steam
generated at the Cogeneration Plant in the period, provided that access by
Comgás and any third parties accompanied by Comgás to the meters
installed at the Cogeneration Plant, as well to the information pertaining to
their calibration, is allowed; |
|
|
d) |
|
in an amount equal to the average of the Daily Taken Amounts
(DTAs) of the last ninety (90) Days on which there was effective
supply subject to later adjustments, upon agreement between the Parties. |
12.10 |
|
All the other matters or disputes pertaining to this Article, whose determinations in
relation to their settlement have not been differently stated in the previous items, shall be
submitted to Expert Proceeding with sharing in equal portions between both
Parties of the corresponding expenses and costs of such procedure. |
39
ARTICLE THIRTEEN EFFECTIVENESS AND EXTENSION
13.1 |
|
- This Agreement shall be valid on its execution date and its end shall occur on
03/31/2023, which may be extended, by means of agreement by the Parties, in writing,
provided that such agreement is formalized with twenty four (24) months in advance to the term
initially agreed for its end. |
|
13.1.1 |
|
In the end, pursuant to the provisions of item 13.1, an additional maximum period of
three hundred and sixty five (365) days shall be added for purposes of recovery by the
User of its eventual remaining balance of the Amounts Paid and Not
Taken, being effective, in this period, all the provisions of the Agreement
related to and necessary for the recovery of such Amounts of Gas.
Exclusively during the additional period referred to in this item and for the sole
purpose of recovery of APNTs, the User shall be released from its Take or
Pay commitment, remaining effective, however, the Ship or Pay and
Distribution Take or Pay commitments. |
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE FOURTEEN - FORTUITOUS CASE OR FORCE MAJEURE |
14.1 |
|
Generic Concept |
|
|
|
Any event or circumstance which combines the following requirements shall be
considered an Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure , with strict observance
of the provision pertaining to force majeure contained in Article 393 and its sole
paragraph of the Brazilian Civil Code: |
|
i. |
|
its occurrence takes place and continues beyond the control of the
Affected Party; |
|
|
ii. |
|
the Affected Party has not contributed, directly or indirectly, for
its occurrence, which includes the fact that it does not arise from (i) default of any
of the obligations of the Affected Party under the terms of this
Agreement; (ii) failure by the Affected Party to comply with the
Law;or (iii) negligence, error or omission of the Affected Party; |
|
|
iii. |
|
the action taken by the Affected Partys, albeit diligent
and timely, is not sufficient to prevent or mitigate the effects of its occurrence;
and |
|
|
iv. |
|
its occurrence has the effect of affecting or preventing performance by the
Affected Party of its obligations provided for in this Agreement. |
14.2 |
|
Effects on the Agreement |
|
|
|
Except as provided in item 14.3, upon the occurrence of an Fortuitous Case or Force
Majeure, the Affected Party shall be relieved from performing its
obligations hereunder,
as well as it shall be exempted from any liability resulting from delays or failure to perform its obligations where directly
attributable to such Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure. |
40
14.3 |
|
Obligations Not Excluded |
|
|
|
No Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure shall relieve the Affected Party
from performing any of its obligations arising or accruing prior to the occurrence
thereof, event though any such obligation may become due during or following the
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure, especially the obligations to pay sums of money
contained herein. |
|
14.4 |
|
Procedures in Occurrences of Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure |
|
14.4.1 |
|
The Affected Party wishing to claim the occurrence of an Fortuitous Case or
Force Majeure for the purposes of item 14.2 above shall take the following steps: |
|
a) |
|
notify the other Party of the occurrence of the event or
condition constituting Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure as soon as
possible, but in no event later than four (4) days from the date on which the
Affected Party became aware of the occurrence of such event of condition,
indicating its estimated duration and its likely impact on the performance of its
obligations; |
|
|
b) |
|
take the necessary actions to correct or mitigate the consequences of
such event, in order to resume its contractual obligations as soon as possible; |
|
|
c) |
|
regularly inform the other Party about its actions and
planned actions with respect to item (b) above; |
|
|
d) |
|
promptly notify the other Party of the cessation of the
event and its consequences; |
|
|
e) |
|
grant to the other Party, whenever possible, access to any
facility affected by the event, for the purpose of local inspection, which may be
conducted at the expense and risk of such other Party; |
|
|
f) |
|
substantiate all facts and actions with documentation or available
records; |
|
|
g) |
|
exercise its rights in good faith and with due regard for the
interests of the other Party with respect to the performance of all
contractual obligations affected by the occurrence of such Fortuitous Case or
Force Majeure. |
41
|
14.4.2 |
|
In connection with item 14.4.1(b) above, the Affected Party shall not
be required, in the case of labor disputes, to act differently from what it may deem
appropriate in its sole judgment, to the extent that it acts in a manner consistent with
pas practices adopted in similar situations. |
|
|
14.4.3 |
|
In the event of dispute as to the characterization of the fact as an Fortuitous Case
or Force Majeure, the Parties shall submit the dispute to
Arbitration, which shall decide based on the provisions of the applicable article
of this Agreement. Until the dispute is decided by the Arbitration
Tribunal, all obligations and rights of the Parties provided for in the
Agreement shall remain valid and applicable. |
14.5 |
|
Scope |
|
|
|
Without limiting the generality of the concept of force majeure contained in Article 393
and its sole paragraph of the Brazilian Civil Code, an Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure
may include the following events, listed by way of illustration only: |
|
i. |
|
acts of terrorism or public attacks, war whether declared or not, threatened
war, guerrilla, insurrection, civil commotion, revolution, riot, rebellion, military
insurrection, coup détat, siege, declaration of state of emergency or martial law,
embargo or blockade or other situations not falling within the exceptions referred to
item 14.6; |
|
|
ii. |
|
acts of sabotage, terrorism, vandalism or accidental destruction, even if
partially, of facilities of the Affected Party, as long as it has
not contributed to such occurrence; |
|
|
iii. |
|
cataclysms, lightning, earthquakes, tornadoes, storms that result in the
evacuation of the affected areas, floods, explosions and exceptional and unpredictable
weather events; |
|
|
iv. |
|
Change in Law (except for the extinction of the tax
benefits provided for in the Priority Program of Thermoelectricity) that
materially adversely affects the object of the Agreement, the
Supplier-Comgás Agreement or the Party claiming the occurrence of
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure; |
|
|
v. |
|
expropriation, seizure, compulsory acquisition or nationalization by any
Public Body of all or a substantially all assets of the Affected
Party required for the performance of such Partys obligations under
this Agreement. |
42
14.6 |
|
Excluded Events |
|
|
|
The following events shall be excluded from the scope of an Fortuitous Case or Force
Majeure: |
|
i. |
|
strike or any other disturbance of similar nature involving solely the
employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Affected
Party; |
|
|
ii. |
|
change in the economic and financial situation of the Affected
Party, as well as changes in the market conditions for delivery of
Gas, whether or not arising by virtue of a drop in the demand for electric
energy generated by the Cogeneration Plant; |
|
|
iii. |
|
any accidental loss, damage or failure in any part of the industry plant,
facilities, machinery or equipment of the Affected Party or the
Cogeneration Plant, or any event related to their businesses, except if
resulting directly from the occurrence of an Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure;
and |
|
|
iv. |
|
delay in the performance of obligations undertaken by contractors or
subcontractors of the Affected Party which affects the performance
of any obligations undertaken by the Affected Party under this
Agreement, except where there is evidence that such delay on the part of the
contractors or subcontractors has resulted directly from the occurrence of an
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure. |
14.7 |
|
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
For all purposes of this Article, and to the extent that the requirements indicated in this
Article Fourteen are evidenced and met, there shall be also considered: |
|
(a) |
|
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure of Comgás:
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure that affects: (i) the ability of the Carrier
and/or the Supplier to perform their respective obligations provided for
in the agreements executed with the Supplier that are required for the
performance of the Supplier-Comgás Agreement by the Supplier or (ii)
the Suppliers ability to perform its respective obligations provided for in
the Supplier-Comgás Agreement; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure of the
User: Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure that affects the ability
of the User to receive the Gas in view of damages at the
Cogeneration Plant. |
43
ARTICLE FIFTEEN- ASSIGNMENT AND ENCUMBRANCE OF RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
15.1 |
|
This Agreement, as well as the rights and obligations arising hereof, may not be
assigned, totally or partially, expect with the written agreement of the other Party,
which may not be unreasonably denied by the non-assigning Party, provided that the
requirements of item 15.1.1 are fulfilled. |
|
15.1.1 |
|
For the agreement referred to in item 15.1, it is an essential requirement that the
proposed assignee fulfill the conditions of technical guarantee and satisfactory economic
solvency to assume, in whole or in part, the obligations arising from the assignment.
Without such requirements, the other party would incur in a commercial risk substantially
greater than the one assumed. The non-assigning party shall be incumbent upon determining,
at its sole criteria, if the assignee fulfill the necessary conditions to the
implementation of the proposed assignment, provided that, in case the non-assigning party
disagrees with the assignment, it shall be incumbent upon evidencing the lack or
insufficiency of the conditions presented against the proposed assignee. |
|
15.1.1.1 |
|
Without prejudice to the provisions above and, if demanded, the User
shall obtain previously to the assignment of the Agreement, all and any
authorizations of the competent public bodies necessary for such assignment,
including authorization of the competent public body linked to the Priority
Program of Thermoelectricity. |
|
15.1.2 |
|
In case of an authorized assignment according to this Article, the assigning party shall
actually transfer to the assignee, in whole or in part, the rights and obligations
established in the Agreement. |
|
|
15.1.3 |
|
Provided that the requirements established in this Articles are fulfilled, the
Parties agree to formalize any and all agreement and other documents necessary
for the assignment, as requested, as well to give reasonable mutual assistance in the
formalization of any assignment. |
15.2 |
|
In addition to the fulfillment of the terms of the legislation in force and of the provisions
of this Article, the Party that whishes to transfer its rights and/or obligations
under this Agreement shall express its intention by means of delivery of
Notice to the other Party. |
|
15.2.1 |
|
Within ninety (90) days following the date of receipt of the Notice referred to
in item 15.2, the non-assigning Party shall give its authorization or justify its
refusal. |
44
|
15.2.1.1 |
|
The lack of formal unfavorable manifestation within the term set forth in item
15.2.1 shall be considered as full agreement with the assignment by the omitting
Party. |
|
|
15.2.1.2 |
|
In case of a refusal by the non-assigning Party that is considered
ungrounded by the assigning Party, the subject shall be submitted to a
decision of the Arbitration Tribunal. |
15.3 |
|
This Agreement, as well as the rights and obligations arising hereof, may not be
pledged or in any other way encumbered by any of the Parties, except with the written
prior agreement of the other Party |
ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOVATION AND FORBEARANCE
16.1 |
|
The provisions set forth in this Agreement are limited to the supply of
Gas as contemplated herein, and shall not be deemed to constitute novation of any
arrangement, covenant or agreement of a similar nature already existing between the
Parties, which shall remain unchanged, except for the Short-Term Agreement. |
|
16.2 |
|
Any and all forbearance with respect to the observance by the Parties of the
terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall not operate as change or
novation of the provisions agreed upon. |
|
16.3 |
|
Comgás and the User decide to ratify the end of the term of the
Short-Term Agreement in view of the execution of this Agreement, considering
that the Short-Term Agreement set forth that its final term would occur on January
20, 2006 or on the execution date of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. |
ARTICLE SEVENTEEN DEFAULT AND TERMINATION
A) Default
17.1 |
|
Default by the User |
|
|
|
Subject to the provisions of subitem 17.1.1, if the User, at any time, fails
to (i) pay, in whole or in part, until its maturity date, the amount corresponding to any
Collection Document submitted to the User by Comgás in view of
this Agreement or, (ii) for disputed amounts, failed to proceed in accordance with
the provisions of item 11.8, (iii) establish, update, reestablish and/or renew the
Guarantee, according to the provisions and terms contained in item 11.9 and its
subitems, then, the default by the User shall be deemed to have occurred
on the maturity date of the respective Collection Document. After
ten (10) days counted as of the date of the default by the User, Comgás may, at
any time from such moment on, at its sole criteria, foreclose the Guarantee in the
amount corresponding to the |
45
|
|
totality of the amount in delay on the date of foreclosure of the referred
Guarantee. After thirty (30) days counted as of the date of default by the
User, Comgás may suspend the delivery of Gas to the
User, subject to the provisions of item 17.1.5 below, until the amount not paid,
added by the corresponding financial charges (as provided for in item 11.6) is: |
|
i. |
|
paid to Comgás on a final basis or |
|
|
ii. |
|
paid to Comgás subject to potential refund. |
|
17.1.1 |
|
It shall not be considered a default by the User the non-payment of any
Collection Document issued by Comgás on the allegation of noncompliance
with a commitment of Take or Pay, Ship or Pay and Distribution Take
or Pay and/or a commitment of Article Ten, of which the User is released in
the corresponding period in accordance with items 17.2 (final part), 17.2.1 and 17.2.2. |
|
|
17.1.2 |
|
The suspension of the supply of Gas as provided for in item 17.1 shall not
release the User from any other obligation in relation to this Agreement
and may not be invoked by the User as a reason for the termination hereof and not
even for the suspension of the commitments of Take or Pay, Ship or Pay or Distribution
Take or Pay and the commitments of Article Ten. |
|
|
17.1.3 |
|
Any possible forbearance by Comgás in the term to start the suspension of
delivery of Gas referred to in item 17.1 shall not be deemed a waiver of right,
and such suspension may start at any time following that term, while said default
persists. |
|
|
17.1.4 |
|
The suspension shall not be applicable to the Amounts Paid and Not Taken
(APNT) of Gas, which will continue being reintegrated in accordance
with the rules of item 9.5.3 and their subitems. |
|
|
17.1.5 |
|
The decision of suspending the supply of Gas in accordance with this item shall
be informed to the User within ten (10) days in advance. |
17.2 |
|
Default by Comgás |
|
|
|
Exception made to the events provided for in subitem 17.2.1, if Comgás any time
fails to: (i) pay, in whole or in part, until its maturity date, the amount corresponding
to any Collection Document submitted to Comgás by the User in
view of this Agreement or, (ii) for disputed amounts, proceed in accordance with
the provisions of item 11.8, then, the default by the User shall be deemed to have
occurred on the maturity date of the respective Collection Document. After thirty
(30) days counted as of the date of default by Comgás, the Users
Take or Pay, Ship or Pay and |
46
|
|
Distribution Take or Pay commitments and the commitments established in
Article Ten shall be suspended until the amount not paid added by the corresponding
financial charges (as provided for in item 11.6) is: |
|
i. |
|
paid to the User on a final basis or |
|
|
ii. |
|
paid to the User subject to potential refund. |
|
17.2.1 |
|
It shall not be considered a default by Comgás the non-payment of any
Collection Document issued by the User directly or indirectly
as a result of the suspension of the supply of Gas caused by a default of the
User as provided for in item 17.1 and its applicable subitems. |
|
|
17.2.2 |
|
The suspension of the commitments of Take or Pay, Ship or Pay and
Distribution Take or Pay and those provided for in Article Ten, in
accordance with item 17.2 and/or subitem 17.2.1, does not release Comgás from any
obligation pertaining to this Agreement and may not be invoked by Comgás
as a reason for its termination. |
B) |
|
Termination |
|
17.3 |
|
Termination for the Users default |
|
|
|
After thirty (30) days have elapsed from any default by the User referred to by
item 17.1 which has not been fully cured, Comgás may unilaterally terminate this
Agreement, by sending a Notice to that effect to the User. |
|
17.3.1 |
|
In the event of termination of the Agreement in accordance with item 17.3
¾ the occurrence of default is evidenced, according to the Agreement, in
order to give cause to said termination ¾, the User: |
|
i. |
|
shall be obliged to pay to Comgás, as the sole indemnification
applicable in such case, the amount of losses and direct damages incurred by
Comgás, excluding any indirect damages and/or loss of profits, resulting
from such termination for default, and the Parties agree and determine
that the amounts of the losses and direct damages incurred by Comgás will
include the amount of the indemnification payable by Comgás to the
Supplier for termination of the Supplier-Comgás Agreement in
view of the termination of this Agreement; the total amount of
such payments shall be limited to the current amount of the remainder of the
Agreement calculated only based on the Gas Price -
according to the regular remaining effectiveness term or one hundred and twenty
(120) months, whichever is shorter, at the discount rate agreed by the
Parties or defined in Arbitration in case the Parties
fail to reach an agreement on such rate, on a pro rata die basis; |
47
|
ii. |
|
shall be responsible to pay all its pending debt toward
Comgás under this Agreement. |
|
17.3.1.1 |
|
The Parties agree that the indemnification set forth in item 17.3.1 (i)
represents the totality of indemnification that may be demanded by Comgás,
even if it sustain greater losses, and nothing else shall be claimed in court or
out-of-court. |
17.4 Termination for default by Comgás
The User may unilaterally terminate this Agreement, by sending a
Notice to Comgás, in any one of the following situations:
|
i. |
|
After thirty (30) days have elapsed from any default by Comgás referred to
in item 17.2 which has not been fully cured; |
|
|
ii. |
|
exception made to Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure, if
Comgás, without prejudice to the obligations provided for in item 9.9, fails to
comply with its obligation of providing the User with the Gas
subject of this Agreement for a term greater than sixty (60) consecutive
Days or ninety (90) alternate Days in each twelve
(12)-Month period. |
|
17.4.1 |
|
In the event of termination of the Agreement in accordance with item 17.4
the occurrence of default is evidenced, according to the Agreement, in order to
give cause to said termination¾, Comgás: |
|
i. |
|
shall be obliged to pay to the User, as the sole indemnification
applicable in such case, the amounts of losses and direct damages incurred by the
User, excluding any indirect damages and/or loss of profits-, resulting
from such termination for default; the total amount of such payments shall be
limited to the current amount of the remainder of the Agreement
calculated only based on the Gas Price according to the regular remaining
effectiveness term or one hundred and twenty (120) months, whichever is shorter,
at the discount rate agreed by the Parties or defined in
Arbitration in case the Parties fail to reach an agreement on
such rate, on a pro rata die basis; |
|
|
ii. |
|
shall remain responsible to pay all its pending debt towards the
User under this Agreement, as well as the amount corresponding
to any possible residual amount of Amount Paid and Not Taken (APNT) of
Gas, multiplied by the amount of the portion pertaining to the commodity
in the Gas Price (PC) in effect on the day of termination multiplied by
the latest Exchange Rate published before the original maturity of the
respective Collection Document provided for in item 11.4. |
|
17.4.1.1 |
|
The Parties agree that the indemnification set forth in item 17.4.1 (i)
represents the totality of indemnification that may be demanded against
Comgás, even if the User sustain greater losses, and nothing else
shall be claimed in court or out of court. |
48
17.5 Other Events of Termination
In addition to the events provided for in items 17.3 and 17.4, this Agreement may
be terminated by either Party, by sending a Notice in writing to the
other Party, in the events below:
|
a) |
|
with no liability whatsoever of any Party
towards the other
Party: |
|
(i) |
|
upon mutual agreement between the Parties; or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
by the impossibility of consumption or supply of Gas
under this Agreement or under the Supplier-Comgás Agreement
as a result of an Fortuitous Case or Force Majeure
lasting for a continued period longer than twelve (12) months; |
|
b) |
|
with liability of the
Party that causes the
termination: |
|
i. |
|
unilateral termination with no fault of the other
Party; |
|
|
ii. |
|
transfer, partially or totally, to any third parties of the rights
and obligations arising of this Agreement, in violation of the provisions
of Article Fifteen; |
|
|
iii. |
|
in view of a relevant violation of any contractual provision that,
under the terms of this Agreement, is not subject to payment by means of a
Collection Document and which has not been cured within the term of ninety (90)
days counted as of the receipt of Notice by the defaulting Party; |
|
|
iv |
|
in the event of termination of the Supplier-Comgás Agreement
for any reason (except for the reason provided for in item (a) (ii) above),
including, but not limited to, for default of either party in such agreement or by
unilateral termination by any of the parties. In this case, the liability for the
termination of this Agreement will be attributed to Comgás; or |
|
|
v. |
|
application for bankruptcy by any of the Parties, if any of the
Parties is decreed bankrupt, application for court or out of court reorganization
by any of the Parties, if said applications are not abandoned, denied or lose
their efficacy, as applicable, within the time set forth in the law or within 60
(sixty) days after they are started, whichever occurs first; or |
|
|
vi. |
|
loss of the applicable licenses by any of the Parties. |
|
|
To these events, analogously and as applicable, the provisions of items 17.3.1,
17.3.1.1, 17.4.1. and 17.4.1.1 shall apply. |
49
17.6 Default in Other Agreements
The default by either Party in any other agreements will not
be considered as default of this Agreement nor will cause
its termination, the application of penalties of any kind or the
suspension of any obligations provided for herein.
17.7 |
|
The User agrees and acknowledges that it is exclusively responsible for the business
relationship with EnergyWorks do Brasil Ltda. or any successor or assigning party thereto,
including for the gas supply and the gas quality. Comgás may only be held liable for
any default in this Agreement exclusively before the User and subject to the
limits of liability provided for herein. The User shall hold Comgás harmless
from any actions or claims filed by third parties, including, without limitation, by
EnergyWorks do Brasil Ltda., grounded on the supply of Gas subject of this
Agreement or of any sub-products resulting from the supply of Gas subject of
this Agreement. The User also undertakes to compensate Comgás if
it may be bound to pay any indemnification to any third parties, including to EnergyWorks do
Brasil Ltda., as a result of such actions or claims. The amounts to be compensated by the
User to Comgás shall include all the indemnification possibly paid by
Comgás, as well as all the costs incurred by Comgás, including attorneys
fees. |
ARTICLE EIGHTEEN NOTICES
18.1 |
|
For all legal purposes arising of the Agreement, the Parties indicate
below their respective domiciles, the only places where all Notices to be made in
relation to the Agreement will be valid: |
|
i. |
|
Companhia de gás de são paulo Comgás
Rua das Olimpíadas, 205 10° andar
São Paulo SP
CEP 04551-000 |
|
|
ii. |
|
Corn Products Brasil Ingredientes Industriais Ltda
Rua Paula Bueno, 2935
Mogi Guaçu SP
CEP 13841-010 |
18.2 |
|
Any of the Parties will be entitled to change its domicile upon Notice
sent to the other party with fifteen (15) days in advance of such change. |
|
18.3 |
|
Any Notice required or allowed, under the terms of this Agreement, will be
considered as received upon its delivery by facsimile transmission or by means of e-mail, in
both circumstances, provided that it is confirmed by means of registered sending or, in case
of personal delivery, at the time of its receipt. |
50
ARTICLE NINETEEN DISPUTE RESOLUTION
|
19.1.1 |
|
In the event of any disputes relating to the interpretation or performance of this
Agreement, prior to taking any other measure the Parties shall seek a
solution by consensus. To this end, either Party shall send Notice to
the other for the Parties to meet in order to pursue such solution by consensus
within no more than 30 days after receipt of Notice, which period may be extended
only by agreement between the Parties. Within such period, the Parties
shall also agree whether the dispute involves a technical issue that should be submitted
to an Expert Proceeding. If the Parties so agree or if it is expressly
set forth in the Agreement that the dispute must be submit to an Expert
Proceeding, prompt action shall be taken for designation of an Expert
pursuant to item 19.3.2. |
|
|
19.1.2 |
|
If a consensus solution is not reached during the period specified in subsection 19.1.1
above or if the Parties come to a consensus that the dispute does not involve a
technical issue requiring submission to an Expert Proceeding, then the dispute in
question shall be resolved by an Arbitration Tribunal, which shall apply in the
resolution of the dispute the substantive laws of Brazil (Arbitration). |
19.2 Arbitration
|
19.2.1 |
|
An Arbitration shall be governed, in all its procedural aspects, by the
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and shall take place in the City of São Paulo. The
administration of the Arbitration shall be conducted by the Brazil-Canadá
Commerce Chamber (BCCC). Arbitration shall necessarily be based on law, and
judgment based on equity or on the general principles of law or on custom and usage shall
be prohibited. In the case of a conflict between the UNCITRAL Rules and the rules
contained in this Agreement, the latter shall prevail. |
|
|
19.2.2 |
|
The language utilized in the Arbitration and the decision handed down in
connection therewith shall be the Portuguese language. |
|
|
19.2.3 |
|
The Arbitration Tribunal shall be composed of three (3) members who (i) shall
have at least ten (10) years of experience in matters relating to the subject matter of
the Arbitration, and (ii) shall have no conflict of interest with the subject
matter of the Arbitration, provided further that the Parties shall
observe the following provisions: |
|
i. |
|
the Party asserting the dispute (First
Party) shall send Notice to the other Party
(Second Party), clearly stating the object of the dispute and
informing the name of the Arbitrator selected by it (First
Arbitrator); |
51
|
ii. |
|
within thirty (30) days from receipt of the Notice mentioned
above, the Second Party shall inform to the First
Party, also by Notice, the name of the Arbitrator
selected by it (Second Arbitrator). If the Second
Party fails to act within said time limit, the First
Party may request that the President of the BCCC appoint the
Second Arbitrator; |
|
|
iii |
|
within fourteen (14) days from the appointment of the Second
Arbitrator, both Arbitrators shall appoint a Third
Arbitrator, who shall preside over the proceedings; and |
|
|
iv. |
|
if there is no consensus as to the appointment of the Third
Arbitrator, such appointment shall be made by the President of the BCCC.
The Third Arbitrator shall be proficient in the Portuguese
language. |
|
19.2.4 |
|
In the event that the UNCITRAL Rules are silent as to any procedural aspects, such
omissions shall be resolved by the arbitrators by reference, in the following
order, to: |
|
a) |
|
to Law No. 9.307/96; and |
|
|
b) |
|
to the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. |
|
19.2.5 |
|
Within ninety (90) Days from commencement of Arbitration, the
Arbitrators shall issue a well-reasoned award (Arbitration Award). |
|
|
19.2.6 |
|
The Arbitration Award shall indicate and describe in detail the
liabilities of the Parties, as well as the portion of legal fees and expenses and
Arbitration costs awarded to each Party. The Arbitration
Award shall be in writing and shall be binding on the Parties, which
specifically waive any judicial review thereof. |
|
|
19.2.7 |
|
The Parties reserve the right to bring legal actions in the Brazilian courts to
(a) ensure institution of Arbitration, (b) seek temporary injunctive relief for
the protection of their rights prior to institution of Arbitration, provided that
any such action shall not be deemed a waiver of Arbitration as the sole method
for resolution of conflicts between the Parties and (c) enforce any decision
issued by the Arbitration Tribunal, including without limitation the
Arbitration Award. In any such event the courts mentioned in item 19.5
shall be the courts of competent jurisdiction. |
19.3 Expert Proceeding
52
|
19.3.1 |
|
Once the Parties have agreed that a dispute is to be submitted to an Expert
Proceeding under item 19.1.1 above or there is an express contractual provision
establishing that a dispute must be submitted to an Expert Proceeding, the
provisions listed in items 19.3.2 through 19.3.7.2 shall apply to such Expert
Proceeding. |
|
|
19.3.2 |
|
Appointment of the Expert |
The procedures for appointment of an Expert are as follows:
|
(a) |
|
a Party wishing to submit a dispute to an Expert
shall give Notice of such intent to the other Party, stating in
detail the reasons for the dispute; |
|
|
(b) |
|
by mutual agreement, the Parties shall within twenty-one
(21) days from delivery of the Notice referred to in the preceding item
appoint the Expert that shall be responsible for reviewing the matters
under dispute; |
|
|
(c) |
|
if within the term specified in the preceding item the
Parties are unable to reach a consensus as to the Expert to be
appointed, then the Party asserting the dispute shall, within five (5)
days, request in writing that the President of the Institute of Technological
Research (IPT) appoint an Expert. Such appointment shall be made within
thirty (30) days from receipt of written request therefor; |
|
|
(d) |
|
either Party may object one time to the Expert
appointed by the President of IPT. In the case of such an objection, the
procedure described in letter (c) of item 19.3.2 above shall be repeated. After
each Party has exercised its right to object as aforesaid, the procedure
described in letter (c) of item 19.3.2 above shall be repeated once again and the
Expert appointed in this manner shall necessarily be accepted by the
Parties. |
|
|
(e) |
|
the terms of the instrument of appointment of the Expert
shall be agreed between the Expert and the Parties and shall be
set forth in a writing to be executed by the Expert and the
Parties, provided further that the Expert and the
Parties shall cooperate in order to have such document finalized as soon
as reasonably possible; |
|
|
(f) |
|
in the event of impediment, refusal or absence of response for a
period of fourteen (14) days, a procedure for appointment of another
Expert, should this be the wish of the Parties: |
53
|
(i) |
|
shall resume at the phase where the last name was
selected; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
shall be repeated accordingly until an Expert
that accepts and is able to assume his/her functions is appointed or until
the Parties decide to discontinue the procedure for appointment or
the submission of the dispute to an Expert; |
|
(g) |
|
if there is a dispute between the Parties over the fees to
be paid to the Expert, such fees shall be determined by the President of
IPT, and the Parties shall necessarily abide by such determination and,
except as otherwise specifically provided for herein or in a separate agreement
for such purpose, the corresponding costs shall be borne equally by both
Parties; |
|
|
(h) |
|
if new facts arise or are disclosed that may cast a doubt on the
impartiality or qualification of the Expert with respect to the dispute,
including his/her omission regarding the provision of item 19.3.3, or if any
Party finds that there is a material risk of conflict of interests that
may influence the decision of the Expert, then either Party may
within seven (7) days from the date on which it became aware of such fact,
disclosure or omission, request that the President of IPT make a decision as to
the removal of the Expert or not; |
|
|
(i) |
|
in his/her decision the President of IPT shall take into account any
conditions which the requesting Party may wish to impose; |
|
|
(j) |
|
if the President of IPT decides to remove the Expert, he/she
shall appoint a replacement. In such case the procedures specified in letters (d)
to (f) above shall also be applicable with respect to the confirmation and
appointment of the new Expert. |
19.3.3 Qualifications of the Expert
The person to be appointed as the Expert:
|
(i) |
|
shall be qualified through technical education, experience and
training to issue an opinion regarding the dispute; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
shall not have a conflict of interests, before or after accepting the
appointment; and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
shall not, at the time of appointment and during his activities as
the Expert with regard to such dispute, hold a position as officer, head
of department, employee, services provider, directly or through a third party, or
consultant of either Party or an Affiliate Company thereof, nor shall he/she have held or will held any such
position during the three (3) years preceding or following his/her appointment
as Expert. |
54
All information, data or documents submitted to the Expert by either
Party shall be deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by the
Expert to any person whatsoever, except to his employees or professional
consultants, provided, however, that such disclosure shall always be subject to the
provisions of item 19.3.4.1.
|
19.3.4.1 |
|
The employees or professional consultants of the Expert shall prior
to receiving any information, data or documents referred to in item 19.3.4 above
specifically undertake in writing with the Expert to maintain them on a
strictly confidential basis. |
|
19.3.5 |
|
Obligations and Prerogatives of the Expert |
The obligations of the Expert shall be set forth in the instrument of his
appointment, among which the following shall necessarily be included:
|
(i) |
|
impartially decide the dispute, based solely upon the facts and data furnished
by the PARTIES; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
decide the dispute within the time limit assigned therefor, which
shall not exceed sixty (60) days from the confirmation of his appointment,
excluding Days corresponding to delay in receiving information requested
or answers to queries or notices given to either Party; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
submit in writing to the Parties, prior to the expiration
of the time limit established in the preceding item, a draft of the document in
which he/she shall set forth his decision of the dispute, indicating the basis
therefor; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
keep and ensure the confidentiality referred to in item 19.3.4; |
|
|
(v) |
|
give ten (10) days prior Notice to the other Party
of any meeting he/she intends to conduct with a Party, so as to enable
such other Party to attend the meeting; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
return to the submitting Party all documents (and copies
thereof) submitted in connection with his/her duties, once they are completed. |
55
|
19.3.5.1 |
|
The Expert shall disregard all information submitted to him after a
period of thirty (30) days from his appointment, except for information delivered to
comply with a specific request, which information shall be delivered within no more
than ten (10) days from the request made by the Expert. |
|
|
19.3.5.2 |
|
The Expert shall be entitled, in addition to the rights contained
in the instrument of his appointment, to request the Parties to deliver any
additional information he/she deems necessary for the resolution of the dispute, as
well as to retain for such purpose any expert or independent consultant, subject to
the determination of its fees within the reasonable limits practiced in the market. |
|
19.3.6 |
|
Obligations and Rights of the Parties |
|
19.3.6.1 |
|
Each Party shall have, with respect to the Expert and the
other Party, the following set of obligations in connection with submission
of a dispute to Expert Proceeding: |
|
(i) |
|
send to the Expert, within thirty (30) days from his
appointment, documentation containing information necessary for the
resolution of the dispute; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
make available to the Expert, within ten (10)
days from the corresponding request, all additional specific information
that the Expert may deem necessary to conduct his activities; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
send concurrently to the other Party copies
of the documentation containing the information referred to in the
preceding two clauses; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
bear its costs for remittance of information to the
Expert and the other Party, as well as its expenses with
legal counsel, consultants, witnesses, employees and other persons involved
in the proceeding; |
|
|
(v) |
|
bear fifty percent (50%) of the common costs and
expenses of the Expert Proceeding, which shall include: |
|
|
|
the fees of the Expert; |
|
|
|
|
the fees of any independent consultant called by the Expert; |
|
|
|
|
the costs of selection and appointment of the Expert, if
made with the intermediation of the President of IPT; |
56
|
(vi) |
|
abide by the final decision of the Expert,
except in the event of fraud or error with respect to the LAW or material
facts or in the event of demonstrable inadequacy in the consideration of
such facts. |
|
19.3.6.2 |
|
The rights of each Party include: |
|
(i) |
|
the right to take part in any meeting of the
Expert with the other Party, as long as it communicates
to the Expert in writing that it intends to participate in such
meeting within five (5) Days from the receipt of the
Notice referred to in item 19.3.5(v); |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the right to comment upon or contest information sent
by the other Party to the Expert, as long as it does so
in writing within fourteen (14) Days from receipt of such
information; and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
specifically in respect of a dispute submitted to
Expert Proceeding, the right to commence Arbitration
proceedings at any time before execution of the instrument for appointment
of Expert referred to in item 19.3.2(e). |
Unless otherwise expressly agreed by the Parties, if within the time limit
assigned in item 19.3.5(ii) the Expert fails to submit his/her decision, then
at the request of either Party the Expert shall be promptly removed
and another Expert shall be appointed, whereupon the appointment procedure
provided for in item 19.3.2 shall apply anew.
|
19.3.7.1 |
|
After a final decision is rendered, the prevailing Party shall be
reimbursed by the Party prevailed upon for all documented costs incurred by
the prevailing Party in connection with the Expert Proceeding. |
|
|
19.3.7.2 |
|
Law 9,307 of September 22, 1996 shall apply on a supplementary basis to this
section to the extent that such Law does not conflict with this section. |
19.4 |
|
Tripartite Arbitration |
57
|
19.4.1 |
|
The Parties recognize that the resolution of certain claims, disputes or
controversies arising out of or relating to this
Agreement may have implications for the performance by Supplier of its obligations under the
Comgás-Supplier Agreement; likewise, the resolution of certain claims,
disputes or controversies arising out of or relating to the Comgás-Supplier
Agreement may have implications for the rights and obligations of the
Parties under this Agreement. Accordingly, in the event of
commencement of arbitration proceedings under this Agreement, whose outcome
may have implications for the rights and/or obligations of Supplier under the
Comgás-Supplier Agreement, or in the event the resolution of a dispute by
arbitration under the Comgás-Supplier Agreement may have implications for the
rights and/or obligations of the Parties under this Agreement, it is
agreed that: (a) the Parties and/or Supplier may consolidate in a
single Tripartite Arbitration the disputes arising out of this
Agreement and the disputes arising out of the Comgás-Supplier
Agreement, (b) the Comgás-Supplier Agreement shall confer on the
User the right to join any arbitration conducted under the Comgás-Supplier
Agreement that meets the requirements in this item; (c) Supplier may join
any Arbitration conducted under this Agreement that meets the
requirements in this item; and (d) Comgás may require that the User
join any arbitration conducted under the Comgás-Supplier Agreement that meets
the requirements in this item (each a Tripartite Arbitration). |
|
19.4.2 |
|
In the event arbitration is commenced under the Comgás-Supplier Agreement,
Comgás shall give Notice of such fact to the User within no
more than 5 days from such commencement. In such case or in the case of
Arbitration instituted under item 19.1.2 hereof, the Parties shall
within no more than sixty (60) days from request for Arbitration confirm
institution of Tripartite Arbitration. In the event the Parties decide
to consolidate arbitrations and in the event the Parties and Supplier
join a Tripartite Arbitration, the Parties shall abandon any separate
arbitration then pending whose subject matter is encompassed by such Tripartite
Arbitration and shall assert any and all claims and counterclaims with regard to
their dispute(s) in such Tripartite Arbitration, in keeping with the procedures
established for such Tripartite Arbitration. |
58
|
19.4.3 |
|
In the event the Parties and Supplier are unable to come to a
consensus as to institution of Tripartite Arbitration within the period mentioned
in item 19.4.2 above, then the Parties and Supplier shall refer the
matter to BCCC. After five (5) days have elapsed from expiry of the period mentioned in
item 19.4.2 above, the Parties and Supplier shall submit in writing to
BCCC their defenses and answers, as the case may be, with respect to institution of
Tripartite Arbitration. Within five (5) days from receipt of the defenses or
answers of the Parties, BCCC shall appoint a sole Arbitrator to resolve
the dispute. Within three (3) days, the Parties and Supplier shall
confirm the appointment of the Arbitrator or shall repudiate such appointment
solely on the basis of item 19.2.3. Should a Party or Supplier so
repudiate, BCCC shall appoint a new Arbitrator that meets the requirements in
subitem 19.2.3 within three (3) days from receipt of repudiation by such Party or
Supplier. Once appointment of the Arbitrator is confirmed, he or she
shall within no more than fifteen (15) days make a decision as to the conduct of
Tripartite Arbitration, which decision shall necessary cover the following
points: (i) whether the conflict involves common factual and legal matters or,
alternatively, whether Supplier holds information necessary for resolution of the
conflict or the solution to be adopted, (ii) in the case of Arbitration requested
or commenced under this Agreement, whether the conflict involves contractual
rights or obligations of Supplier warranting its joining the proceedings or,
alternatively, in the case of arbitration requested or commenced under the
Comgás-Supplier Agreement, whether the conflict involves contractual rights or
obligation of the User warranting its joining the proceedings, (iii) whether a
Party shall be adversely affected by institution of Tripartite
Arbitration, and (iv) if separation of the disputes may pose a risk that conflicting
decisions be rendered as regards this Agreement and the Comgás-Supplier
Agreement. |
|
|
19.4.4 |
|
Tripartite Arbitration shall be conducted by five (5) arbitrators, the
User to appoint the first Arbitrator, Comgás to appoint the
second Arbitrator and Supplier to appoint the third Arbitrator
within thirty (30) Days after receipt of Notice confirming initiation of
Tripartite Arbitration. The two (2) remaining Arbitrators shall be
appointed by mutual agreement as among the Arbitrators appointed by the
Parties and Supplier. If a Party or Supplier fails to
appoint its Arbitrator, such appointment shall be made by BCCC in keeping with
the criteria set forth in subitem 19.2.3(iv). |
|
|
19.4.5 |
|
Decisions rendered in Tripartite Arbitration proceedings shall produce uniform
effects on this Agreement and on the Comgás-Supplier Agreement. |
|
|
19.4.6 |
|
To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of item 19.4 and its subitems, the terms
and conditions set forth in Item 19.2 shall apply to Tripartite Arbitration,
including as regards applicable rules and regulations, place of Arbitration and effects of the Arbitration AWARD. |
59
19.5 Jurisdiction
The Parties elect the courts sitting in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo,
to settle any issues arising out of this Agreement that cannot be resolved through
Arbitration as a result of an express law provision, to the exclusion of any other
courts, no matter how privileged they may be.
19.6 Applicable Law
This Agreement will be ruled and construed under the laws of the Federative
Republic of Brazil.
ARTICLE TWENTY- GENERAL LIMIT OF LIABILITY
Except in the case provided in item 17.4.1, for which case there is a specific liability
limit, the Parties hereby agree that, in no event whatsoever, the totality of payments to
be made by Comgás to the User, as a result of penalties and/or indemnification
under the terms of this Agreement, shall exceed, during the whole effectiveness of this
Agreement, the total maximum limit corresponding to six point five percent (6.5%) of the
amount of the Agreement, determined by the following formula:
IL= K x 0.065 x DCA x N x GP, where
|
|
|
|
|
IL
|
|
-
|
|
is the maximum limit of payments to be made by Comgás; |
|
|
|
|
|
DCA
|
|
-
|
|
is the Daily Contracted Amount; |
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
-
|
|
is the number of days of effectiveness of the Agreement,
calculated as of the execution date of the
Agreement up to the final date set forth in item
13.1; |
|
|
|
|
|
GP
|
|
|
|
is the Gas Price in force on the date of occurrence
of each event of payment converted to Reais per
Cubic Meter at the Reference Conditions
according to the Exchange Rate of the last
business day of the Month of payment of a certain
indemnification. |
|
|
|
|
|
K
|
|
-
|
|
Is the percentage of use of the IL, which shall vary from 0 to
1, and, on the execution date of this Agreement,
shall correspond to 1. At each payment made by Comgás
for penalties and/or indemnification, under the terms of
this Agreement, a new K factor shall be determined by
the reduction of (i) the percentage corresponding to such
payment in relation to the value 0.065 x DCA x N x GP from the
(ii) previous K factor. |
60
ARTICLE TWENTY-ONE AMENDMENT
This Agreement and the Annex hereto may not be amended unless by a written instrument
signed by both Parties
ARTICLE TWENTY-TWO ANNEXES
The annex to this Agreement, which is an integral part hereof, is the following document:
Annex 1 Gas Price.
ARTICLE TWENTY-THREE CONTRACTUAL AMOUNT
This Agreement is ascribed the amount of R$ 560,060,513.77 (Five hundred and sixty
million, sixty thousand, five hundred and thirteen reais and seventy seven cents), equivalent to
US$ 231,803,532.04 (Two hundred and thirty one million, eight hundred and three thousand, five
hundred and thirty two dollars and four cents) on June 16, 2005. Given the nature of this
Agreement, the amount indicated is estimate, not including the adjustments provided for
contractually, as well as taxes of any kind, nor it will be applicable to any provision of this
instrument.
ARTICLE TWENTY-FOUR AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
The Parties express their agreement to the full contents of the Agreement,
binding themselves to faithfully and strictly comply with it. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, they execute in
the city of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, four (4) counterparts of a single tenor and contents and
for a single effect, on January 21, 2006.
COMPANHIA DE GÁS DE SÃO PAULO COMGÁS:
|
|
|
(sgd.) Paulo César Nunes de Souza
Logistics and Human Resources Officer
|
|
(sgd.) André Lopes de Araújo
Industrial Market, VNG and Great
Commerce Officer |
61
CORN PRODUCTS BRASIL INGREDIENTES INDUSTRIAIS LTDA.
|
|
|
(sgd.) Gilberto Sabatini Affonso
Finance and Administration Officer
|
|
(sgd.) Alberto Yoshio Nakata
Attorney |
|
|
|
(sgd.) Carlos Edgard Montagna
Tax ID (CPF):070,846,528-50
|
|
(sgd.) José Wagner Rodrigues da Silva
Tax ID (CPF): 063,391,588-20 |
A N N E X 1
GAS PRICE
I)
Definition and
Composition
The Gas Price at the Delivery Point (GP) shall be comprised of the sum of
two portions: one pertaining to the Commodity (PC) and other pertaining to Transportation
(PT), according to their respective amounts at each time, so that GP = PC + PT.
I.1) Base Price:
In relation to the month of April 2000, the amounts of the portion
pertaining to the Commodity (PCB) and the portion
pertaining to Transportation
(PTB)
on cash and with
no taxes, are as follows:
|
§ |
|
PCB US$ 1.101/MMBTU |
|
|
§ |
|
PTB US$ 1.374/MMBTU, |
So
that the base Gas Price
(GPB) amounts to
US$ 2.475/MMBTU, to be converted into Reais as per I.4.
62
I.2) Price at Commercial Supply Start-up
At the Commercial Supply Start-up, the portions comprising the
Gas Price ¾ for effectiveness up to the last day of the
month preceding the first anniversary of the Commercial Supply
Start-up ¾ shall be calculated by the application of the
following formula:
|
§ |
|
PCi
= PCB
x |
PPI1 |
i |
|
|
|
PPI0 |
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
|
PTi
= PTB
x |
PPI1 |
,
where: |
|
|
|
PPI0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCi
|
|
-
|
|
Is the amount of the portion
pertaining to the commodity at
the Commercial Supply
Start-up; |
|
PTi
|
|
-
|
|
Is the amount of the portion
pertaining to Transportation at
the Commercial Supply
Start-up; |
|
PPI1
|
|
-
|
|
Is the Producer Price Index,
Industrial Commodities published
by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics
related to the month preceding
the month of the Commercial
Supply Start-up; |
|
PPI0
|
|
-
|
|
Is the Producer Price Index,
Industrial Commodities published
by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics
related to the month of March
2000. |
I.3) Annual Readjustments
On an annual basis, on the first day of the month of anniversary of the
Commercial Supply Start-up, the portions comprising the Gas
Price ¾ for effectiveness for a period of twelve (12) months
¾ shall be readjusted as follows:
|
§ |
|
PCi
= PCB
x |
PPIi |
, |
|
|
|
PPI0 |
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
|
PTi
= PTB
x |
PPIi |
,
|
|
|
|
PPI0 |
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
|
PCi
|
|
-
|
|
Is the amount of the portion
pertaining to the commodity
adjusted and applicable to each
twelve (12)-month period; |
|
PTi
|
|
-
|
|
Is the amount of the portion
pertaining to Transportation
adjusted and applicable to each
twelve (12)-month period |
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPIi
|
|
-
|
|
Is the Producer Price Index,
Industrial Commodities published
by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics
related the month preceding the
adjustment month; |
|
PPI0
|
|
-
|
|
Is the Producer Price Index,
Industrial Commodities published
by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics
related to the month of March
2000; |
|
|
I.4) The amounts of each portion previously defined shall be converted from US$/MMBTU to
R$/MMBTU through the Exchange Rate of the day preceding the maturity day of the
invoice pertaining to the gas supply. |
II) Taxes, Contributions and Liens
Each portion previously defined shall be added by the taxes, contributions (including
PIS/PASEP and COFINS) and other liens on which they are levied or shall be levied.
III) Criteria for Rounding up and Decimal Places
In the calculations of prices stated in this annex, four (04) decimal places shall be used
for all prices, portions and indexes participating in those calculations. The rounding up
criteria shall be the mathematics criteria, i.e.:
If the fifth decimal place ranges from 0 through 4, the fourth place shall maintain its
value;
If the fifth decimal place ranges from 5 through 9, the fourth place shall be
added a unit.
exv11w1
EXHIBIT 11.1
Earnings Per Share
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Computation of Net Income Per Share of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at the start of the period |
|
|
74,528 |
|
Weighted average of new shares issued during the period |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of treasury shares issued during the period
for exercise of stock options, other stock compensation plans,
and acquisitions |
|
|
909 |
|
Weighted average of treasury shares purchased during the period |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
74,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
|
|
|
|
Average dilutive shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
75,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
89,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Per Common Share Basic |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Per Common Share Diluted |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
32
exv12w1
EXHIBIT 12.1
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
148.4 |
|
|
$ |
145.1 |
|
|
$ |
135.4 |
|
|
$ |
117.1 |
|
|
$ |
102.1 |
|
Fixed charges |
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
186.7 |
|
|
$ |
182.2 |
|
|
$ |
176.9 |
|
|
$ |
157.2 |
|
|
$ |
162.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |
|
|
4.33 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED CHARGES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on debt |
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
$ |
39.3 |
|
|
$ |
60.5 |
|
Amortization of discount on debt |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Interest portion of rental expense on operating leases |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
$ |
41.4 |
|
|
$ |
62.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
exv13w1
EXHIBIT 13.1
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
We are a leading regional producer of starches, liquid sweeteners and other ingredients around the
world. We are one of the worlds largest corn refiners and the leading corn refiner in South
America. The corn refining industry is highly competitive. Many of our products are viewed as
commodities that compete with virtually identical products manufactured by other companies in the
industry. However, we have twenty-seven manufacturing plants located throughout North America,
South America and Asia/Africa and we manage and operate our businesses at a local level. We
believe this approach provides us with a unique understanding of the cultures and product
requirements in each of the geographic markets in which we operate, bringing added value to our
customers. Our sweeteners are found in products such as baked goods, candies, chewing gum, dairy
products and ice cream, soft drinks and beer. Our starches are a staple of the food, paper,
textile and corrugating industries.
Critical success factors in our business include managing our significant manufacturing costs,
including corn and utilities. In addition, due to our global operations we are exposed to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, as well as to changes in interest rates. We use
derivative financial instruments, when appropriate, for the purpose of minimizing the risks and/or
costs associated with fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates.
Also, the capital intensive nature of the corn wet milling industry requires that we generate
significant cash flow on a yearly basis in order to selectively reinvest in the business and grow
organically, as well as through strategic acquisitions and alliances. We utilize certain key
metrics relating to working capital, debt and return on capital employed to monitor our progress
toward achieving our strategic business objectives (see section entitled Key Performance
Metrics).
In 2005, the Company achieved its second best year for net income and diluted earnings per common
share, eclipsed only by our record performance in 2004. We benefited from net sales and operating
income growth in South America and Asia/Africa in 2005; however, operating income for our North
American business declined significantly, due in large part to higher energy and logistics costs,
and operating issues and boiler reliability at our Argo facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, our
largest plant.
Despite the difficulties in North America, we generated record operating cash flow in 2005 that we
used to grow our business, reduce debt, repurchase common stock and enhance our liquidity.
34
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
On December 1, 2004, the Companys board of directors declared a two-for-one stock split effected
as a 100-percent stock dividend on the Companys common stock. The dividend shares were issued on
January 25, 2005 to shareholders of record at the close of business on January 4, 2005.
Accordingly, all share and per share data for the periods prior to the stock split included in this
report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.
2005 COMPARED TO 2004
NET INCOME . Net income for 2005 decreased 4 percent to $90 million, or $1.19 per
diluted common share, from 2004 net income of $94 million, or $1.25 per diluted common share. The
2004 results included a restructuring charge for plant closures of $21 million ($15 million
after-tax). See discussion of 2004 compared to 2003 below and Note 6 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information pertaining to the 2004 restructuring
charge.
The decrease in net income for 2005 from 2004 primarily reflects a decline in operating income for
our North American business, and an increase in the provision for income taxes. Increased
operating income in South America and Asia/Africa, and a reduction in the minority interest in
earnings, partially offset these unfavorable variances.
NET SALES. Net sales for 2005 increased to $2.36 billion from $2.28 billion in 2004, as sales grew
in each of our regions.
A summary of net sales by geographic region is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
1,422 |
|
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
% |
South America |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Asia/Africa |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in net sales reflects a 5 percent increase from currency translation attributable to
stronger foreign currencies relative to the US dollar and 1 percent volume growth, which more than
offset a 3 percent price/product mix reduction.
Sales in North America were relatively unchanged as volume growth of 3 percent, reflecting
significant growth in Mexico partially offset by reduced volume in the United States, and a 1
percent benefit from currency translation attributable to a stronger Canadian dollar, was offset by
a 4 percent price/product mix decline. HFCS sales in Mexico for 2005 returned to levels attained
prior to the imposition of the discriminatory tax on beverages sweetened with HFCS in that country
(see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Sales in South America
increased 8 percent, as a 13 percent translation benefit attributable to stronger South American
currencies more than offset a 3 percent price/product mix decline and a 2 percent volume reduction.
Sales in Asia/Africa increased 9 percent,
reflecting a 6 percent increase attributable to stronger Asian currencies, price/product mix
improvement of 2 percent and 1 percent volume growth.
35
COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for 2005 increased 5 percent to $2.03 billion from $1.93 billion in
2004. The increase was principally due to volume growth and higher energy costs. In 2005, we
experienced an increase in global energy costs of approximately 21 percent over 2004, mainly
reflecting higher natural gas costs. Our gross profit margin for 2005 was 14 percent, compared
with 15 percent in 2004, as lower margins in North America and South America more than offset
higher margins in Asia/Africa.
SELLING, GENERAL and ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses for 2005 were $158 million, unchanged from 2004. SG&A expenses for 2005 represented 7
percent of net sales, consistent with the prior year.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)-NET. Other income (expense)-net for 2005 increased to $9 million from $4
million in 2004. The increase primarily reflects a $2 million gain from the sale of non-core
assets and a $1 million increase in fee and royalty income.
OPERATING INCOME. A summary of operating income is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
% Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
South America |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Asia/Africa |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Plant closing costs (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes a $19 million write-off of fixed assets and a $2 million charge for employee
termination costs pertaining to the Companys manufacturing optimization initiative in Mexico
and South America. See also Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Operating income for 2005 increased 2 percent to $183 million from $179 million in 2004.
Operating income for 2004 included a $21 million restructuring charge for plant closures. Excluding
the restructuring charge from the prior year period, operating income decreased 8 percent from
2004, as significantly lower earnings in North America more than offset improved results in
Asia/Africa and South America. North America operating income decreased 32 percent from a year
ago, as Mexicos results, which nearly doubled from 2004, were more than offset by significantly
weaker results in the United States and Canada. The decrease in the US/Canadian results primarily
reflects higher energy and logistics costs. Additionally, lower product selling prices
(particularly for co-products), volume reductions, and increased maintenance expense contributed to
the decline. Operating difficulties, including poor boiler
performance, at our
Argo plant in Bedford Park, Illinois contributed to the higher maintenance and energy costs.
The US results were also negatively impacted by $4 million of expenses relating to the loss of
corn gluten feed attributable to Hurricane Katrina. South America operating income increased 3
percent from 2004, reflecting earnings
growth in the Southern Cone and Andean regions of South America and continued strong results in
Brazil. Asia/Africa operating income grew 10
36
percent from a year ago, driven principally by
improved earnings in South Korea, where lower corn costs favorably affected our business. This was
partially offset by weaker results at our Thailand operations primarily relating to a drought that
effected our tapioca root supply and plant operations. Additionally, a $2 million gain from the
sale of non-core assets in Malaysia contributed to the earnings increase in the region.
FINANCING COSTS-NET. Financing costs-net increased to $35 million in 2005 from $34 million in
2004. The increase primarily reflects increased interest expense mainly attributable to higher
interest rates and larger foreign currency transaction losses, which more than offset increases in
capitalized interest and interest income.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. Our effective income tax rate was 37.5 percent in 2005 as compared to
30 percent in 2004. The increase primarily reflects the effect of a change in our income mix for
2005 as compared with 2004. As a result of the earnings decline in the US, we do not expect to be
able to use certain foreign income tax credits in the US, thereby increasing our effective income
tax rate.
MINORITY INTEREST IN EARNINGS. Minority interest in earnings declined to $3 million in 2005
from $8 million in 2004. The decline from 2004 mainly reflects the effect of our December 2004
purchase of the remaining interest in our now wholly-owned South Korean business.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME. We recorded comprehensive income of $160 million in 2005, as compared
with comprehensive income of $116 million in 2004. The improvement in comprehensive income mainly
reflects favorable variances relating to cash flow hedges, which more than offset declines in the
currency translation adjustment and net income. The decline in the change in the currency
translation adjustment primarily reflects the effect of a more moderate strengthening in end of
period foreign currencies for 2005, as compared with 2004, when foreign currency appreciation was
more significant, particularly for the Korean Won.
2004 COMPARED TO 2003
NET INCOME . Net income for 2004 increased 24 percent to $94 million, or $1.25 per
diluted common share, from 2003 net income of $76 million, or $1.06 per diluted common share. The
2004 results include a restructuring charge for plant closures of $21 million ($15 million
after-tax) relating to the Companys manufacturing optimization initiative in Mexico and South
America, which consists of a $19 million write-off of fixed assets and a $2 million charge for
employee termination costs. See also Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The increase in net income for 2004 over 2003 primarily reflects improved operating income, reduced
financing costs, a lower effective income tax rate and a reduction in the minority interest in
earnings.
NET SALES. Net sales for 2004 increased to $2.28 billion from $2.10 billion in 2003, as sales grew
in each of our regions.
37
A summary of net sales by geographic region is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
South America |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Asia/Africa |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,102 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in net sales reflects volume growth of 4 percent, price/product mix improvement of 2
percent, and a 3 percent increase from currency translation attributable to stronger foreign
currencies relative to the US dollar.
Sales in North America increased 7 percent, reflecting volume growth of 3 percent, price/product
mix improvement of 2 percent, and a 2 percent increase associated with currency translation
attributable to a stronger Canadian dollar. Sales in South America increased 12 percent, driven by
volume growth of 7 percent and a 6 percent increase attributable to stronger foreign currencies,
which more than offset a 1 percent price/product mix decline. Sales in Asia/Africa increased 11
percent, reflecting price/product mix improvement of 9 percent and a 2 percent increase
attributable to stronger Asian currencies. Volume in the region was relatively unchanged from
2003.
COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for 2004 increased 9 percent to $1.93 billion from $1.78 billion in
2003. The increase was principally due to volume growth and higher corn and energy costs. Our
gross profit margin for 2004 was 15 percent, consistent with last year, as improved margins in
North America and South America offset lower margins in Asia/Africa.
SELLING, GENERAL and ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. SG&A expenses for 2004 increased 6 percent to $158
million from $149 million in 2003, due primarily to higher compensation-related expenses and
increased corporate governance costs related to the implementation of the provisions of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SG&A expenses for 2004 represented 7 percent of net sales, consistent
with the prior year.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)-NET. Other income (expense)-net for 2004 increased $5 million from 2003,
primarily reflecting a $1 million gain from the sale of an investment in 2004 and the recording, in
2003, of various asset write-downs aggregating $3 million.
38
OPERATING INCOME. A summary of operating income is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
(in millions) |
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
% Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
South America |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Asia/Africa |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Plant closing costs (a) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes a $19 million write-off of fixed assets and a $2 million charge for employee
termination costs pertaining to the Companys manufacturing optimization initiative in Mexico
and South America. See also Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Operating income for 2004, including the $21 million restructuring charge for plant closures,
increased 3 percent to $179 million from $174 million in 2003. Excluding the restructuring charge,
operating income increased 15 percent from 2003 driven by earnings growth in North America and
South America. North America operating income increased 28 percent from a year ago primarily due
to improved performance in Canada and Mexico. Additionally, operating income in the region
benefited from new legislation in Mexico that allowed us to reduce an existing employee benefit
accrual by $2.6 million. The earnings increase in Mexico partially reflects increased sales of
HFCS which, as previously mentioned, increased late in third quarter 2004 and are continuing,
despite the countrys tax on beverages sweetened with HFCS. See also Note 3 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. South America operating income increased 18 percent from 2003,
principally reflecting significantly higher earnings in Brazil where robust economic growth has
resulted in strong demand for our products. Asia/Africa operating income declined 11 percent from
2003, principally due to an earnings decline in South Korea, where lower sales volume attributable
to a weak economy and higher corn costs unfavorably affected our business.
FINANCING COSTS-NET. Financing costs-net declined to $34 million in 2004 from $39 million in
2003. The decrease primarily reflects lower interest costs attributable to reduced indebtedness
and an increase in interest income. An increase in foreign currency transaction losses of
approximately $1 million partially offset the lower interest costs.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. Our effective income tax rate was 30 percent in 2004 as compared to 36
percent in 2003. The decrease mainly reflects a reduction in foreign income taxes attributable to
a statutory rate reduction and a favorable tax ruling in Mexico. Additionally, a statutory rate
reduction in South Korea also contributed to the lower effective tax rate.
MINORITY INTEREST IN EARNINGS. Minority interest in earnings declined to $8 million in 2004 from
$10 million in 2003. The decline from 2003 mainly reflects the effect of our March 2003 purchase
of the remaining interest in our now wholly-owned Southern Cone of South America business and lower
earnings in South Korea, partially offset by increased earnings in Pakistan.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME. We recorded comprehensive income of $116 million in 2004, as compared with
comprehensive income of $151 million in 2003. This decrease primarily reflects losses on cash flow
hedges, which more than offset increased net income.
39
LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL RESOURCES
At December 31, 2005, our total assets were $2.39 billion, up from $2.37 billion at December 31,
2004. This increase primarily reflects translation effects associated with stronger foreign
currencies relative to the US dollar. Stockholders equity increased to $1.21 billion at December
31, 2005 from $1.08 billion at December 31, 2004, principally attributable to our 2005 net income,
gains on cash flow hedges, favorable currency translation effects, and the exercise of stock
options.
At December 31, 2005, we had total debt outstanding of $528 million, compared to $568 million at
December 31, 2004. The debt outstanding includes $255 million (face amount) of 8.25 percent senior
notes due 2007, $200 million (face amount) of 8.45 percent senior notes due 2009 and $75 million of
consolidated subsidiary debt, consisting of local country borrowings. Of the consolidated
subsidiary debt, $57 million represents short-term borrowings. Corn Products International, as the
parent company, guarantees certain obligations of several of its consolidated subsidiaries, which
aggregated $29 million at December 31, 2005. Management believes that such consolidated
subsidiaries will meet their financial obligations as they become due.
The principal source of our liquidity comes from our internally generated cash flow, which we
supplement as necessary with our ability to borrow on our bank lines and to raise funds in both the
debt and equity markets. We have a $180 million Revolving Credit Agreement (the Revolving Credit
Agreement), consisting of a $150 million revolving credit facility in the US and a $30 million
revolving credit facility for our wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, which expires in September
2009. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement at December 31,
2005. We also have approximately $333 million of unused operating lines of credit in the various
foreign countries in which we operate.
The weighted average interest rate on total Company indebtedness was approximately 7.0 percent and
6.1 percent for 2005 and 2004, respectively. During 2005 and 2004, we benefited from interest rate
swap agreements that effectively converted the interest rate associated with the Companys 8.45
percent senior notes to a variable interest rate. On August 5, 2005, we terminated $50 million of
our $200 million fixed to floating rate interest rate swap agreements associated with our 8.45
percent $200 million senior notes due August 2009. The swap termination resulted in a gain of
approximately $2 million, which is being amortized as a reduction to financing costs over the
remaining term of the underlying debt (through August 2009). At December 31, 2005, the fair value
of the remaining interest rate swap agreements relating to $150 million of our senior notes due
2009 approximated $5 million. The fair value of the outstanding interest rate swap agreements at
December 31, 2004 approximated $18 million.
On February 1, 2006, we terminated the remaining fixed to floating interest rate swap
agreements associated with the 8.45 percent senior notes. The swap termination resulted in a gain
of approximately $3 million that will be amortized as a reduction to financing costs over the
remaining term of the underlying debt (through August 2009).
40
NET CASH FLOWS
A summary of operating cash flows is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Write-off of fixed assets plant closures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Minority interest in earnings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Changes in working capital |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operations |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operations was $245 million in 2005, as compared with $166 million in 2004. The
increase in operating cash flow was driven by a decrease in working capital principally
attributable to a reduction in margin accounts relating to corn futures contracts in the US and
Canada, improved collections on accounts receivable and lower inventories. We plan to continue to
hedge our US and Canadian corn purchases through the use of corn futures contracts and accordingly,
will be required to make or be entitled to receive, cash deposits for margin calls depending on the
movement in the market price for corn. The cash provided by operations was used primarily to fund
capital expenditures, repurchase shares of common stock, reduce debt and pay dividends. Listed
below are the Companys primary investing and financing activities for 2005 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Payments on debt |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
14 |
|
Dividends paid (including dividends to
minority interest shareholders) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
We currently anticipate that capital expenditures for 2006 will approximate $150 million. Included
in this estimate are expenditures relating to the completion of the previously announced $100
million capital project at our Argo plant located in Bedford Park, Illinois. The project will
include the shutdown and replacement of the plants three current coal-fired boilers with one
coal-fired boiler. This project is expected to reduce the plants emissions as well as provide
more efficient, reliable and effective energy production. Construction began in the fourth quarter
of 2004 and is currently expected to be completed by the end of the third quarter of 2006.
On December 7, 2005, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share
of common stock. The cash dividend was paid on January 25, 2006 to stockholders of record at the
close of business on January 4, 2006.
We expect that our operating cash flows and borrowing availability under our credit facilities will
be more than sufficient to fund our anticipated capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividends and
other investing and/or financing strategies for the foreseeable future.
41
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The table below summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005.
Information included in the table is cross-referenced to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements elsewhere in this report, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
|
2 3 |
|
|
4 5 |
|
|
than 5 |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
reference |
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating Lease
Obligations |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Purchase
Obligations * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,126 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The purchase obligations relate principally to power supply agreements, including take
or pay energy supply contracts, which help to provide us with an adequate power supply at certain
of our facilities. |
On January 20, 2006, Corn Products Brasil Ingredientes Industrias Ltda. (CPO Brazil), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement (the
Agreement) with Companhia de Gas de Sao Paulo Comgas (Comgas). Pursuant to the terms of the
Agreement, Comgas will supply natural gas to the cogeneration facility at CPO Brazils Mogi Guacu
plant.
The Agreement will expire on March 31, 2023, unless extended or terminated under certain conditions
specified in the Agreement. During the term of the Agreement, CPO Brazil is obligated to purchase
from Comgas, and Comgas is obligated to provide to CPO Brazil, certain minimum quantities of
natural gas that are specified in the Agreement. The price for such quantities of natural gas is
determined pursuant to a formula set forth in the Agreement. It is estimated that the total minimum
expenditures by CPO Brazil throughout the term of the Agreement would be approximately
US$230,000,000, based on current exchange rates and estimates regarding the application of the
formula set forth in the Agreement, spread evenly over the approximately 17-year term of the
Agreement. These amounts are included in the purchase obligations disclosed in the table
above.
As described in Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we have an
agreement with certain common stockholders (collectively the holder), a representative of which
serves on our Board of Directors, relating to 1,227,000 common shares, that provides the holder
with the right to require us to repurchase the underlying common shares for cash at a price equal
to the average of the closing per share market price of the Companys common stock for the 20
trading days immediately preceding the date that the holder exercises the put option. The put
option is exercisable at any time until January 2010 when it expires. The holder can also elect to
sell the common shares on the open market, subject to certain restrictions. The holder of the put
option may not require us to repurchase less than 500,000 shares on any single exercise of the put
option, and the put option may not be exercised more than once in any six month period. In the
event the holder exercises the put option requiring us to repurchase the shares, we would be
required to pay for the shares within 90 calendar days from the exercise date if the holder is
selling the minimum number of shares (500,000), and within a prorated time period of between 90 and
360 calendar days if the holder is selling more than the minimum number of shares. For
intermediate share amounts, a
pro-rata payment period would be calculated (based on the
42
number of shares put). Any amount due
would accrue interest at our revolving credit facility rate from the date of exercise until the
payment date. In the event the holder had put all of the shares subject to the agreement to us on
December 31, 2005, we would have been obligated to repurchase the shares for approximately $29
million based upon the average of the closing per share market price of the Companys common stock
for the 20 trading days prior to December 31, 2005 ($23.43 per share). This amount is reflected as
redeemable common stock in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2005.
We currently anticipate that in 2006 we will make cash contributions of $1 million and $5 million
to our US and Canadian pension plans, respectively. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information with respect to our pension and postretirement benefit
plans.
43
KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS
The Company uses certain key metrics to better monitor our progress towards achieving our strategic
business objectives. These metrics relate to our return on capital employed, our financial
leverage, and our management of working capital, each of which is tracked on an ongoing basis. We
assess whether we are achieving an adequate return on invested capital by measuring our Return on
Capital Employed against our cost of capital. We monitor our financial leverage by regularly
reviewing our ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(Debt to EBITDA) and our Debt to Capitalization percentage to assure that we are properly
financed. We assess our level of working capital investment by evaluating our Operating Working
Capital as a percentage of Net Sales. We believe the use of these metrics enables us to better
run our business and is useful to investors.
The metrics below include certain information (including Capital Employed, Adjusted Operating
Income, EBITDA, Adjusted Current Assets, Adjusted Current Liabilities and Operating Working
Capital) that is not calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP). A reconciliation of these amounts to the most directly comparable financial measures
calculated in accordance with GAAP is contained in the following tables. Management believes that
this non-GAAP information provides investors with a meaningful presentation of useful information
on a basis consistent with the way in which management monitors and evaluates the Companys
operating performance. The information presented should not be considered in isolation and should
not be used as a substitute for our financial results calculated under GAAP. In addition, these
non-GAAP amounts are susceptible to varying interpretations and calculations, and the amounts
presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
44
Our calculations of these key metrics for 2005 with comparison to the prior year are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Capital Employed |
(dollars in millions) |
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,081 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Redeemable common stock |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital employed (a) |
|
$ |
1,925 |
|
|
$ |
1,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
Adjusted for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (at effective tax rates of 37.5% in
2005 and 30% in 2004) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income, net of tax (b) |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Capital Employed (b¸a) |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to EBITDA ratio |
(dollars in millions) |
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt (a) |
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Add back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in earnings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Interest expense, net of interest income of $5 and
$3, respectively |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (b) |
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to EBITDA ratio (a ÷ b) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to Capitalization percentage |
(dollars in millions) |
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt (a) |
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Redeemable common stock |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and capital (b) |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to Capitalization percentage (a¸b) |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Working Capital as a percentage of Net Sales |
(dollars in millions) |
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
684 |
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted current assets |
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
462 |
|
Less: Short-term debt |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted current liabilities |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating working capital (a) |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (b) |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Working Capital as a percentage
of Net Sales (a ¸ b) |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary on Key Performance Metrics:
In accordance with the Companys long-term objectives, we have set certain goals relating to these
key performance metrics that we will strive to meet. To date, we have achieved three of our four
established targets and we currently anticipate that our operating performance in 2006 will improve
over 2005, which should contribute towards the eventual attainment of our Return on Capital
Employed goal. However, no assurance can be given that this goal will be attained and various
factors could affect our ability to achieve not only this goal, but to also continue to meet our
other key performance metric targets. See
46
Item 1A Risk Factors and Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. The
objectives set out below reflect our current aspirations in light of our present plans and existing
circumstances. We may change these objectives from time to time in the future to address new
opportunities or changing circumstances as appropriate to meet the long-term needs of the Company
and its shareholders.
Return on Capital Employed Our long-term goal is to achieve a Return on Capital Employed in
excess of 8.5 percent. In determining this performance metric, the negative cumulative translation
adjustment is added back to stockholders equity to calculate returns based on the Companys
original investment costs. The decrease in our computed return to 5.9 percent for 2005, from 6.6
percent in 2004, primarily reflects the impact of the significant decline in operating income in
the US and its unfavorable impact on our income tax provision. Our effective income tax rate for
2005 was 37.5 percent, up from 30 percent in 2004. Operating income for 2004 included a $21
million restructuring charge for plant closures. See also Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information relating to the plant closures.
Debt to EBITDA ratio Our long-term objective is to maintain a ratio of debt to EBITDA of less
than 2.25. This ratio declined to 1.8 at December 31, 2005 from 2.0 at December 31, 2004,
primarily attributable to our reduction in debt. The EBITDA for 2004 was negatively impacted by
the $21 million restructuring charge for plant closures. At a ratio of 1.8 at December 31, 2005 we
have additional capacity to support organic and/or acquisition growth should we need to increase
the Companys financial leverage.
Debt to Capitalization percentage Our long-term goal is to maintain a Debt to Capitalization
percentage in the range of 32 to 35 percent. At December 31, 2005 our Debt to Capitalization
percentage was 27.6 percent, as compared with 30.3 percent a year ago, reflecting a reduction in
debt and an improved capital base.
Operating Working Capital as a percentage of Net Sales Our long-term goal is to maintain
operating working capital in a range of 8 to 10 percent of our net sales. The metric increased to
8.1 percent at December 31, 2005 from 7.8 percent a year ago, primarily reflecting an increase in
operating working capital. We will continue to focus on managing our working capital in 2006.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
We have identified below the most critical accounting policies upon which the financial statements
are based and that involve our most complex and subjective decisions and assessments. Senior
management of the Company has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these policies
with members of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. These accounting policies are
disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The discussion that follows
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
47
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company has substantial investments in property, plant and equipment and goodwill. For
property, plant and equipment we recognize the cost of depreciable assets in operations over the
estimated useful life of the assets, and we evaluate the recoverability of these assets whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be
recoverable. For goodwill we perform an annual impairment assessment (or more frequently if
impairment indicators arise) as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We have chosen to perform this annual impairment
assessment in December of each year. An impairment loss is assessed and recognized in operating
earnings if the fair value of either goodwill or property, plant and equipment is less than its
carrying amount. For long-lived assets we test for recoverability whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable as required by SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets.
In analyzing the fair value of goodwill and assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of
property, plant and equipment, we have to make projections regarding future cash flows. In
developing these projections, we make a variety of important assumptions and estimates that have a
significant impact on our assessments of whether the carrying values of goodwill and property,
plant and equipment should be adjusted to reflect impairment. Among these are assumptions and
estimates about the future growth and profitability of the related business unit, anticipated
future economic, regulatory and political conditions in the business units market, the appropriate
discount rates relative to the risk profile of the unit or assets being evaluated and estimates of
terminal or disposal values.
Goodwill
We completed the required annual test of goodwill impairment for all of our affected reporting
units in December 2005. In each case, based on our assumptions about future cash flows we expect
to be able to generate from each reporting unit, the fair value of the reporting unit was in excess
of the related carrying amounts, and accordingly, no impairment of goodwill was required to be
measured and recognized.
On January 1, 2002, a discriminatory tax on beverages sweetened with high fructose corn syrup
(HFCS) approved by the Mexican Congress late in 2001, became effective. In response to the
enactment of the tax, which at the time effectively ended the use of HFCS for beverages in Mexico,
we ceased production of HFCS 55 at our San Juan del Rio plant, one of our three plants in Mexico.
Over time, we have resumed production and sales of HFCS to certain beverage customers. These sales
increased significantly beginning late in the third quarter of 2004, and in 2005, returned to
levels attained prior to the imposition of the tax as a result of certain customers having obtained
court rulings exempting them from paying the tax. The sales are continuing in 2006; however, the
tax remains in place. For information regarding the status of the tax, see Note 3 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our ability to fully recover the carrying value of our long-term investment in Mexico, which
consists primarily of goodwill and property, plant and equipment associated with the Mexican
operations, is dependent upon the generation of sufficient cash flows from the use or disposition
of these assets. Based on long-term forecasts of operating results, including the assumptions
described below, we believe that the Company will generate sufficient cash flows from these
long-term assets to fully recover their carrying values, and accordingly, no impairment of either
goodwill or other long-term assets related to Mexico was recognized as of December 31, 2005.
In developing the estimates of the cash flows expected to be generated from the Mexican operations,
we have assumed that shipments of HFCS to the Mexican beverage industry will continue for the
foreseeable
future at levels attained in 2005, which were significantly higher than the actual results from
each of the three previous years.
48
While we continue our efforts to gain repeal of the tax, we cannot predict with any certainty the
likelihood or timing of such repeal nor can we predict whether the Mexican beverage customers will
continue purchasing HFCS at current levels. Failure to repeal the tax and a decline from the
current levels of HFCS shipments could have a negative effect on the operating results and cash
flows of our Mexican operation.
In the event that the tax is not ultimately repealed or modified, or that actual results
significantly differ from those assumed, the Company could be required to recognize an impairment
of goodwill and the amount of such impairment could be material. The carrying value of the
goodwill related to the Mexican operations was approximately $120 million at December 31, 2005.
As previously disclosed, in response to the imposition of the tax we submitted an arbitration claim
against the government of Mexico under the provisions of NAFTA seeking recovery in an amount not
less than $325 million. In concluding that an impairment of the Mexican goodwill may arise if the
tax is not repealed or its effect on HFCS sales in Mexico is not otherwise mitigated, we have not
assumed that any proceeds would be received from our arbitration claim for compensation under NAFTA
against the Mexican government. Any recovery we receive from the resolution of this claim would
reduce or offset in whole or part, the amount of any impairment to be recognized. However, no
assurance can be made that we will be successful with the arbitration claim.
Fixed Assets
In September 2005, the Canadian government initiated an anti-dumping and/or countervailing duty
(AD/CVD) investigation on grain corn imported from the United States. The investigation related to
the alleged effect of United States grain corn related subsidies on the Canadian grain corn market
and the alleged dumping of United States grain corn into Canada. In November 2005, the Canadian
International Trade Tribunal (CITT) made a preliminary determination of injury and in December 2005
the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) imposed a provisional duty on imported United States grain
corn of US$l.65 per bushel.
Our Canadian subsidiary is a large industrial corn user and the sole processor of corn-refined
starches, sweeteners, corn oil and animal feeds in Canada. We are pursuing all regulatory and
other measures available to participate in the AD/CVD process, oppose the AD/CVD and, in the
alternative, to minimize the amount of final duties imposed.
The CBSA is continuing its investigation of this matter and is expected to make a final decision as
to the amount of final duties in mid-March 2006, although the final duties, if any, are not
anticipated to become effective until mid-April 2006, when the CITT makes its final determination
of injury. Final duties are typically imposed for five years, although this period could be
shortened or extended depending upon future developments relating to alleged subsidization and/or
dumping activities. Further appeals and related processes are available after the final
determination of duties, but the final duties will be collected unless and until an appeal or
similar process results in a reduction or elimination of final duties. Depending upon the amount
of final duties, if any, management believes that the potential duties could have a significant
impact on our Canadian operations. However, given that (i) the duty imposed in December 2005 is
provisional and (ii) we are currently exploring several initiatives to minimize the impact of any
such duties on the Canadian subsidiary as well as on the Company as a whole, including the
reconfiguration of our North American business, operations, customers and markets, we have
concluded that it is not necessary to test the long-term assets in Canada for recoverability under
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets, during 2005.
49
Depending on the amount of the final duty and the success
of the initiatives outlined above, it may be necessary to close one or more of our three existing
Canadian plants and/or test those assets for recoverability under SFAS No. 144. The carrying value
of the long-lived assets in Canada at December 31, 2005 was approximately $176 million.
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company sponsors non-contributory defined benefit plans covering substantially all employees in
the United States and Canada, and certain employees in other foreign countries. We also provide
healthcare and life insurance benefits for retired employees in the United States and Canada. In
order to measure the expense and obligations associated with these retirement benefits, management
must make a variety of estimates and assumptions, including discount rates used to value certain
liabilities, expected return on plan assets set aside to fund these costs, rate of compensation
increase, employee turnover rates, retirement rates, mortality rates, and other factors. These
estimates and assumptions are based on our historical experience, along with our knowledge and
understanding of current facts, trends and circumstances. We use third-party specialists to assist
management in evaluating our assumptions and estimates, as well as to appropriately measure the
costs and obligations associated with our retirement benefit plans. Had we used different
estimates and assumptions with respect to these plans, our retirement benefit obligations and
related expense could vary from the actual amounts recorded, and such differences could be
material. See also Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, Inventory Costs an amendment of
ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151), which clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle
facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage. The standard requires that such costs be
excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 151 will
have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets an amendment of
APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions (SFAS 153), which requires that exchanges of
productive assets be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1)
neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within
reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for
non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company
does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 153 will have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which revises
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, and supersedes APB 25. Among other items,
SFAS 123R eliminates the use of APB 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires
companies to recognize in the financial statements the cost of employee services received in
exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant-date fair value of those awards.
This cost is to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide
service in exchange for the award (typically the vesting period). SFAS 123R also requires that
benefits associated with tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a
financing cash inflow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature.
50
SFAS 123R permits companies to adopt its requirements using either a modified prospective method,
or a modified retrospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost
is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the
requirements of SFAS
123R for all share-based awards granted or modified after that date, and based on the
requirements of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R.
Under the modified retrospective method, the requirements are the same as under the modified
prospective method, but this method also permits entities to restate financial statements of
previous periods based on proforma disclosures made in accordance with SFAS 123. The Company is
adopting SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. The Company
does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements. Refer to the proforma disclosures under Stock Based Compensation in Note 2
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for an indication of ongoing expense that
will be included in the consolidated income statement beginning in the first quarter of 2006.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS 154),
which changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle. The statement requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements
of changes in accounting principle, unless impracticable to do so. It also requires that a change
in the depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived non-financial assets be
accounted as a change in accounting estimate, effected by a change in accounting principle.
Accounting for error corrections and accounting estimate changes will continue under the guidance
in APB Opinion 20, Accounting Changes, as carried forward in this pronouncement. The statement
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect that
the adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2005, the FASB issued FSP Nos. FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. This FSP addresses
the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired, whether the impairment is
other-than-temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The investment is impaired if
the fair value is less than cost. The impairment is other-than-temporary for equity securities
and debt securities that can contractually be prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the
investor would not recover substantially all of its cost. If other-than-temporary, an impairment
loss shall be recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the investments cost and its
fair value. The guidance in this FSP is effective in reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2005. The Company is reviewing FSP Nos. FAS 115-1 and 124-1, but does not expect that the
adoption of this FSP will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
51
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Corn Products International, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Corn Products International, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders ´ equity and redeemable equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Corn Products International, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our
report dated March 8, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of, and the
effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 8, 2006
52
Corn Products International, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
For the Years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
53
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Net sales before shipping and handling costs |
|
$ |
2,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,461 |
|
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
Less shipping and handling costs |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
2,102 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Other (income) expense-net |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Plant closing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs-net |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Minority interest in earnings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
|
|
72.0 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
54
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share and per share amounts) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,097 |
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,823 |
) |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(less accumulated amortization of $31 and $30, respectively) |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Investments |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Redeemable common stock (1,227,000 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2005 and 2004) stated at redemption value |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock authorized 25,000,000 shares-
$0.01 par value, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock authorized 200,000,000 shares-
$0.01 par value 74,092,774 issued
at December 31, 2005 and 2004 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
Less: Treasury stock (common stock; 1,528,724 and 792,254
shares at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively) at cost |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Deferred compensation restricted stock |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(321 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
55
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of income
tax effect of $7, $15 and $5, respectively |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) on
cash flow hedges included in net income, net of
income tax effect of $14, $5 and $5, respectively |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Minimum pension liability, net of income tax effect |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
56
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Redeemable Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable |
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Treasury |
|
Deferred |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Retained |
|
Common |
(in millions) |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Stock |
|
Compensation |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,015 |
|
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(418 |
) |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net
of income tax effect of $5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization to compensation expense of restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of redeemable common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(343 |
) |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Losses on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net
of income tax effect of $5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock as compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit attributable to exercises of employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization to compensation expense of restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value and number of shares of redeemable common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,047 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(321 |
) |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net
of income tax effect of $14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit attributable to exercises of employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization to compensation expense of restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of redeemable common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(251 |
) |
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
57
CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
Non-cash charges (credits) to net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Write-off of fixed assets plant closures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Minority interest in earnings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Earnings from non-controlled affiliates |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Foreign currency transaction losses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in trade working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of plants and properties |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on debt |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Dividends paid (including to minority interest shareholders) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
58
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1- Description of the Business
Corn Products International, Inc. (the Company) was founded in 1906 and became an independent and
public company as of December 31, 1997. The Company operates domestically and internationally in
one business segment, corn refining, and produces a wide variety of products.
NOTE 2- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation The consolidated financial statements consist of the accounts of the
Company, including all significant subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current years presentation.
These reclassifications had no effect on previously recorded net income.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, other than those whose functional currency is the
US dollar, are translated at current exchange rates with the related translation adjustments
reported in stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Income statement accounts are translated at the average exchange rate during the period. Where the
US dollar is considered the functional currency, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at
current exchange rates with the related adjustment included in net income. Non-monetary assets and
liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates. The Company incurs foreign currency
transaction gains/losses relating to assets and liabilities that are denominated in a currency
other than the functional currency. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company incurred foreign currency
transaction losses (gains) of $3 million, $1 million, and ($0.4 million), respectively. The
Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders equity on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets includes negative cumulative translation adjustments of $257 million and $292
million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Per share data All amounts per common share and the number of common shares for all periods
included in this report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the January 25, 2005
two-for-one stock split. See Note 14, Stockholders Equity, for additional information
pertaining to the stock split.
Cash and cash equivalents Cash equivalents consist of all instruments purchased with an original
maturity of three months or less, and which have virtually no risk of loss in value.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs are
determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Investments Investments in the common stock of affiliated companies over which the Company does
not exercise significant influence are accounted for under the cost method and are carried at cost
or less. At December 31, 2005, the Company had an investment accounted for under the cost method
of $6 million. Investments that enable the Company to exercise significant influence, but do not
represent a controlling interest, are accounted for under the equity method; such investments are
carried at cost or less, adjusted to reflect the Companys proportionate share of income or loss,
less dividends received. The Company would recognize a loss on these investments when there is a
loss in value of an investment which is other than a temporary decline.
59
Property, plant and equipment and depreciation Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost
less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is generally computed on the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets, which range from 10 to 50 years for buildings and
from 3 to 25 years for all other assets. Where permitted by law, accelerated depreciation methods
are used for tax purposes. The Company reviews the recoverability of the net book value of
property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the
net book value of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows expected to
result from its use and eventual disposition. If this review indicates that the carrying values
will not be recovered, the carrying values would be reduced and an impairment loss would be
recognized.
Goodwill and other intangible assets Goodwill ($351 million and $344 million at December 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively) represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired. The
Company also has other intangible assets ($8 million and $9 million at December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively) principally related to the recognition of minimum pension
liabilities. The carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets by geographic segment as
of December 31, 2005 and 2004 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
South America |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Asia/Africa |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142), the Company assesses goodwill for impairment annually (or more frequent if
impairment indicators arise). The Company has chosen to perform this annual impairment assessment
in December of each year. The Company has completed the required impairment assessments and
determined there to be no goodwill impairment.
Revenue recognition The Company recognizes operating revenues at the time title to the goods and
all risks of ownership transfer to customers. This generally occurs upon the date of shipment,
except in the case of consigned inventories where title passes and the transfer of ownership risk
occurs when the goods are used by the customer.
Hedging instruments The Company uses derivative financial instruments principally to offset
exposure to market risks arising from changes in commodity prices and interest rates. Derivative
financial instruments currently used by the Company consist of commodity futures contracts and
interest rate swap agreements. The Company enters into futures contracts, which are designated as
hedges of specific volumes of commodities (corn and natural gas) that will be purchased and
processed in a future month. These readily marketable exchange-traded futures contracts are
recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The Company has also entered into
interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on certain fixed rate debt
to a variable interest rate and, on certain variable rate debt, to a fixed interest rate.
On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as either
a hedge of variable cash flows to be paid related to interest on variable rate debt or certain
forecasted purchases of corn or natural gas used in the manufacturing process (a cash-flow
hedge), or as a hedge of the fair value of certain debt obligations (a fair-value hedge). This
process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair-value or cash-flow hedges to
specific assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, or to specific firm commitments
or forecasted transactions. For all hedging relationships, the Company formally documents the
hedging relationships and its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge
transactions, the hedging instrument, the item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the
hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed, and a
description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. The Company also formally assesses, both
at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging
transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or fair values of hedged
items. When it is
determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a
highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.
60
Changes in the fair value of a floating-to-fixed interest rate swap or a futures contract for corn
or natural gas that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge
are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income taxes, and recognized
in the Consolidated Statement of Income when the variable rate interest is paid or the finished
goods produced using the hedged item are sold. The maximum term over which the Company hedges
exposures to the variability of cash flows for commodity price risk is 36 months. Changes in the
fair value of a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreement that is highly effective and that is
designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with the loss or gain on the hedged debt
obligation that is attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in earnings. The ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of a derivative instrument that qualifies as either a cash-flow
hedge or a fair-value hedge is reported in earnings.
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative
is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows or fair value of the hedged item,
the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, the derivative is de-designated as a
hedging instrument because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur, or management
determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not
occur, the Company continues to carry the derivative on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at its fair
value, and gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) are
recognized immediately in earnings. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined
that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge, the Company continues to
carry the derivative on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at its fair value and no longer adjusts the
hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value. The adjustment of the carrying amount of the
hedged asset or liability is accounted for in the same manner as other components of the carrying
amount of that asset or liability. In all other situations in which hedge accounting is
discontinued, the Company continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings.
Stock-based compensation The Company has a stock incentive plan that provides for stock-based
employee compensation, including the granting of stock options and shares of restricted stock, to
certain key employees. The plan is more fully described in Note 14. The Company accounts for the
stock incentive plan in accordance with the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Under this
method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of
the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. Under the Companys stock incentive plan, stock
options are granted at exercise prices that equal the market value of the underlying common stock
on the date of grant. Therefore, no compensation expense related to stock options is recorded in
the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS 123), established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value based method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS 123, the Company has
elected to continue to apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting described above, and
has adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123. The following table illustrates the
effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair-value-based recognition provisions of SFAS
123 had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period:
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
Add: Stock-based
employee compensation
expense included in
reported net income, net
of tax |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based
employee compensation
expense determined under
fair value based method
for all awards, net of
related tax effects |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
Earnings per common share Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of shares outstanding (including redeemable common stock), which
totaled 74.7 million for 2005, 73.4 million for 2004 and 72.0 million for 2003. Diluted earnings
per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding, including the dilutive effect of stock options outstanding. The weighted average
number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS calculations were 75.6 million, 74.7 million and 72.4
million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In 2005, 2004 and 2003, options to purchase
1,019,150, 165,907 and 2,078,978 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the
calculation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS because their
effects were anti-dilutive.
Risks and uncertainties The Company operates domestically and internationally in one business
segment. In each country, the business and assets are subject to varying degrees of risk and
uncertainty. The Company insures its business and assets in each country against insurable risks in
a manner that it deems appropriate. Because of this geographic dispersion, the Company believes
that a loss from non-insurable events in any one country would not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys operations as a whole. Additionally, the Company believes there is no significant
concentration of risk with any single customer or supplier, or small group of customers or
suppliers, whose failure or non-performance would materially affect the Companys results.
Recently issued accounting standards In November 2004, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151,
Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151), which clarifies the
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage.
The standard requires that such costs be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when
incurred. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does
not expect that the adoption of SFAS 151 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FSP FAS 109-1 Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the FSP) to provide guidance on the application of Statement 109 to
the provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) that provides tax relief to
US domestic manufacturers. The FSP states that the manufacturers deduction for qualified
production activities provided for under the Act should be accounted for as a special deduction in
accordance with Statement 109 and not as a tax rate reduction. A special deduction is
accounted for by recording the deduction in the year in which it can be taken in the Companys tax
return. The adoption of the FSP has not had a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
62
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 provides, among other things, for a special one-time tax
deduction of 85 percent of certain foreign earnings that are repatriated, as defined in the Act.
The effect of the repatriation provision did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets an amendment of
APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions (SFAS 153), which requires that exchanges of
productive assets be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1)
neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within
reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for
non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company
does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 153 will have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which revises
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, and supersedes APB 25. Among other items,
SFAS 123R eliminates the use of APB 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires
companies to recognize in the financial statements the cost of employee services received in
exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant-date fair value of those awards.
This cost is to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide
service in exchange for the award (typically the vesting period). SFAS 123R also requires that
benefits associated with tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost that are
recognized by crediting additional paid-in capital be reported as a financing cash inflow, rather
than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature.
SFAS 123R permits companies to adopt its requirements using either a modified prospective method,
or a modified retrospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost
is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the
requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based awards granted or modified after that date, and based
on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS
123R. Under the modified retrospective method, the requirements are the same as under the
modified prospective method, but this method also permits entities to restate financial
statements of previous periods based on proforma disclosures made in accordance with SFAS 123. The
original effective date for adoption of SFAS 123R has been deferred, and the Company is now
required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 123R at the beginning of the first annual period beginning
after June 15, 2005. The Company is adopting SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2006 using the
modified prospective method. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have
a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Refer to proforma disclosures under
Stock-based compensation presented earlier in this Note 2 for an indication of ongoing expense
that will be included in the Consolidated Income Statement beginning in the first quarter of 2006.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that a conditional asset retirement
obligation, as used in SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, refers to a
legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of the
settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the
entity. The Statement is effective for the Company no later than December 31, 2005. The adoption
of FIN 47 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS 154),
which changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting
principle. The statement requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements
of changes in accounting principle, unless impracticable to do so. It also requires that a change
in the depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived non-financial assets be
accounted as a change in accounting estimate, effected by a change in accounting principle.
Accounting for error corrections and accounting estimate changes will continue under the guidance
in APB Opinion 20, Accounting Changes, as carried forward in this pronouncement. The statement
is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect that the adoption of
SFAS 154 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
63
In November 2005, the FASB issued FSP Nos. FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. This FSP addresses
the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired, whether the impairment is
other-than-temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The investment is impaired if
the fair value is less than cost. The impairment is other-than-temporary for equity securities
and debt securities that can contractually be prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the
investor would not recover substantially all of its cost. If other-than-temporary, an impairment
loss shall be recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the investments cost and its
fair value. The guidance in this FSP is effective in reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2005. The Company is reviewing FSP Nos. FAS 115-1 and 124-1, but does not expect that the
adoption of this FSP will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 Mexican Tax on Beverages Sweetened with HFCS/Recoverability of Mexican Assets
On January 1, 2002, a discriminatory tax on beverages sweetened with high fructose corn syrup
(HFCS) approved by the Mexican Congress late in 2001, became effective. In response to the
enactment of the tax, which at the time effectively ended the use of HFCS for beverages in Mexico,
the Company ceased production of HFCS 55 at its San Juan del Rio plant, one of its three plants in
Mexico. Over time, the Company resumed production and sales of HFCS to certain beverage customers.
These sales increased significantly beginning late in the third quarter of 2004, and in 2005,
returned to levels attained prior to the imposition of the tax as a result of certain customers
having obtained court rulings exempting them from paying the tax. These sales are continuing in
2006; however, the tax remains in place.
The Companys ability to fully recover the carrying value of its long-term investment in Mexico,
which consists primarily of goodwill and property, plant and equipment associated with the Mexican
operations, is dependent upon the generation of sufficient cash flows from the use or disposition
of these assets. Based on long-term forecasts of operating results, including the assumptions
described below, the Company believes that it will generate sufficient cash flows from these
long-term assets to fully recover their carrying values, and accordingly, no impairment of either
goodwill or other long-term assets related to Mexico was recognized as of December 31, 2005.
In developing the estimates of cash flows expected to be generated from the Mexican operations, the
Company has assumed that shipments of HFCS to the Mexican beverage industry will continue for the
foreseeable future at levels attained in 2005, which were significantly higher than the actual
results in each of the three previous years.
While the Company continues its efforts to gain repeal of the tax, it cannot predict with any
certainty the likelihood or timing of such repeal nor can it predict whether the Mexican beverage
customers will continue purchasing HFCS at current levels. Failure to repeal the tax and a decline
from the current levels of HFCS shipments could have a negative effect on the operating results and
cash flows of the Mexican operation.
In the event that the tax is not ultimately repealed or modified, or that actual results
significantly differ from those assumed, the Company could be required to recognize an impairment
of goodwill and the amount of such impairment could be material. The carrying value of the
goodwill related to the Mexican operations was approximately $120 million at December 31, 2005.
As previously disclosed, in response to the imposition of the tax the Company submitted an
arbitration claim against the government of Mexico under the provisions of NAFTA seeking recovery
in an amount not less than $325 million. In concluding that an impairment of the Mexican goodwill
may arise if the tax is not repealed or its effect on HFCS sales in Mexico is not otherwise
mitigated, the Company has not assumed that any proceeds would be received from its arbitration
claim for compensation under NAFTA against the Mexican government. Any recovery the Company
receives from the resolution of this claim would reduce or offset, in whole or in part, the amount
of any impairment to be recognized. However, no assurances can be made that the Company will be
successful with its arbitration claim.
On October 7, 2005, the World Trade Organization (WTO) issued a Report of the Panel stating that
Mexicos tax on beverages sweetened with HFCS violated Mexicos WTO commitments. The report of the
Appellate Body was issued on March 6, 2006 and upheld the Panels conclusion. The process toward
conclusion of the matter is expected to continue for several months, and the Company continues to
support a permanent resolution to this issue.
64
NOTE 4 Canadian Anti-Dumping/Countervailing Duties
In September 2005, the Canadian government initiated an anti-dumping and/or countervailing duty
(AD/CVD) investigation on grain corn imported from the United States. The investigation related to
the alleged effect of United States grain corn related subsidies on the Canadian grain corn market
and the alleged dumping of United States grain corn into Canada. In November 2005, the Canadian
International Trade Tribunal (CITT) made a preliminary determination of injury and in December 2005
the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) imposed a provisional duty on imported United States grain
corn of US$l.65 per bushel.
The Companys Canadian subsidiary is a large industrial corn user and the sole processor of
corn-refined starches, sweeteners, corn oil and animal feeds in Canada. The Company is pursuing
all regulatory and other measures available to participate in the AD/CVD process, oppose the AD/CVD
and, in the alternative, to minimize the amount of final duties imposed.
The CBSA is continuing its investigation of this matter and is expected to make a final decision as
to the amount of final duties in mid-March 2006, although the final duties, if any, are not
anticipated to become effective until mid-April 2006, when the CITT makes its final determination
of injury. Final duties are typically imposed for five years, although this period could be
shortened or extended depending upon future developments relating to alleged subsidization and/or
dumping activities. Further appeals and related processes are available after the final
determination of duties, but the final duties will be collected unless and until an appeal or
similar process results in a reduction or elimination of final duties. Depending upon the amount
of final duties, if any, management believes that the potential duties could have a significant
impact on the Companys Canadian operations. However, given that (i) the duty imposed in December
2005 is provisional and (ii) the Company is currently exploring several initiatives to minimize the
impact of any such duties on the Canadian subsidiary as well as on the Company as a whole,
including the reconfiguration of the North American business, operations, customers and markets,
the Company has concluded that it is not necessary to test the long-term assets in Canada for
recoverability under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,
during 2005. Depending on the amount of the final duty and the success of the initiatives outlined
above, it may be necessary for the Company to close one or more of its three existing Canadian
plants and/or test those assets for recoverability under SFAS No. 144. The carrying value of the
long-lived assets in Canada at December 31, 2005 was approximately $176 million.
NOTE 5 Acquisitions/Dispositions
On December 29, 2004, the Company increased its ownership in Doosan Corn Products Korea, Inc. to
100 percent by purchasing an additional 25 percent ownership interest from the minority interest
shareholders, and subsequently renamed the wholly-owned subsidiary Corn Products Korea, Inc. The
Company paid $65 million in cash to acquire the additional ownership interest, which approximated
the carrying value of the minority interest.
On December 1, 2004, the Company sold its investment in Nihon Shokuhin Kako Kabishiki Kaisha
(NSK), a Japanese corn refiner, for $21 million in cash. The Company recorded a $1 million
pretax gain from the sale, which is included in other income in the 2004 Consolidated Statement of
Income.
On March 27, 2003, the Company increased its ownership in its Southern Cone of South America
business to 100 percent by purchasing an additional 27.76 percent ownership interest from the
minority interest shareholders. The Company paid $53 million to acquire the additional ownership
interest, consisting of $45 million in cash and the issuance of 541,584 shares of common stock
valued at $8 million. Goodwill of approximately $37 million was recorded.
The Company also made other acquisitions during the last three years, none of which, either
individually or in the aggregate, were material.
65
All of the Companys acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method. Had the
acquisitions described above occurred at the beginning of the respective years, the effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements would not have been significant.
NOTE 6 Restructuring Charges
As part of a manufacturing optimization initiative in Mexico and South America, the Company
permanently closed two production facilities in the fourth quarter of 2004. As a result of these
plant closures, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $21 million ($15 million after-tax)
which is classified as plant closing costs in the Consolidated Statement of Income for 2004. The
$21 million charge consists of a $19 million write-off of fixed assets and $2 million in expenses
for employee severance costs and related benefits pertaining to the termination of approximately
160 employees. The $19 million charge included write-offs of fixed assets in Mexico and South
America of approximately $14 million and $5 million, respectively. The $2 million charge for
employee severance and related benefits included costs of $1 million in each of Mexico and South
America. As of December 31, 2005, the restructuring accrual was fully utilized.
NOTE 7 Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Fair value of financial instruments:
The carrying values of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term
borrowings approximate fair values. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt is estimated by
discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently available to the Company
for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. Based on market quotes of the yields at
which the Company could issue debt with similar terms and remaining maturities, the fair value of
long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt, at December 31, 2005 and 2004, was
$513 million and $540 million, respectively.
Derivatives:
The Company uses derivative financial instruments primarily to manage the exposure to price risk
related to corn and natural gas purchases used in the manufacturing process and to manage its
exposure to changes in interest rates on outstanding debt instruments. The Company generally does
not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose other than hedging the cash flows associated
with future interest payments on variable rate debt and specific volumes of commodities that will
be purchased and processed in a future month, and hedging the exposure related to changes in the
fair value of certain outstanding fixed rate debt instruments. The Company occasionally hedges
commercial transactions and certain liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the
currency of the operating unit entering into the underlying transaction. The Company does not
speculate using derivative instruments.
The derivative financial instruments that the Company uses in its management of commodity-price
risk consist of open futures contracts and options traded through regulated commodity exchanges.
The derivative financial instruments that the Company uses in its management of interest rate risk
consist of interest rate swap agreements. By using derivative financial instruments to hedge
exposures to changes in commodity prices and interest rates, the Company exposes itself to credit
risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty will fail to perform under the
terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the
counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit risk for the Company. When the fair value of a
derivative contract is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it does not
possess credit risk. The Company minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering
into transactions only with investment grade counterparties. Market risk is the adverse effect on
the value of a financial instrument that results from a
change in commodity prices or interest rates. The market risk associated with commodity-price and
interest rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types
and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.
The Company maintains a commodity-price risk management strategy that uses derivative instruments
to minimize significant, unanticipated earnings fluctuations caused by commodity-price volatility.
For example, the manufacturing of the Companys products requires a significant volume of corn and
natural gas. Price fluctuations in corn and
natural gas cause market values of corn inventory to
differ from its cost and the actual purchase price of corn and natural gas to differ from
anticipated prices.
66
The Company periodically enters into futures and option contracts for a portion of its anticipated
corn and natural gas usage, generally over the next twelve months, in order to hedge the price risk
associated with fluctuations in market prices. The contracts limit the unfavorable effect that
price increases will have on corn and natural gas purchases. All of the Companys futures and
option contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges.
Unrealized gains and losses associated with marking the corn and natural gas futures and option
contracts to market are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and included
in the stockholders equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets as part of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). These amounts are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the
month in which the related corn or natural gas is used or in the month a hedge is determined to be
ineffective.
The Company assesses the effectiveness of a hedge using a corn or natural gas futures or option
contract based on changes in the contracts intrinsic value. The changes in the market value of
such contracts has historically been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at
offsetting changes in the price of the hedged item. The amounts representing the ineffectiveness
of these cash flow hedges are not significant.
The Company assesses its exposure to variability in interest rates by continually identifying and
monitoring changes in interest rates that may adversely impact future cash flows and the fair value
of existing debt instruments, and by evaluating hedging opportunities. The Company maintains risk
management control systems to monitor interest rate risk attributable to both the Companys
outstanding and forecasted debt obligations as well as the Companys offsetting hedge positions.
The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including sensitivity
analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of the
Companys outstanding and forecasted debt instruments.
The Company uses a combination of fixed and variable rate debt to finance its operations. The debt
obligations with fixed cash flows expose the Company to variability in the fair value of
outstanding debt instruments due to changes in interest rates. The Company has entered into
interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on certain fixed-rate debt
to a variable rate. These swaps call for the Company to receive interest at a fixed rate and to
pay interest at a variable rate, thereby creating the equivalent of variable-rate debt. The
Company has designated these interest rate swap agreements as hedges of the changes in fair value
of the underlying debt obligation attributable to changes in interest rates and accounts for them
as fair value hedges. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging
instruments that effectively offset the variability in the fair value of outstanding debt
obligations are reported in earnings. These amounts offset the gain or loss (that is, the change
in fair value) of the hedged debt instrument that is attributable to changes in interest rates
(that is, the hedged risk) which is also recognized currently in earnings. The Company has also
entered into a cross currency interest rate swap agreement that effectively converts certain
floating rate US dollar denominated debt to a fixed rate Korean Won obligation. This swap has been
designated as a hedge of floating interest rate payments attributable to changes in interest rates
and is accounted for as a cash flow hedge, with changes in the fair value of the swap recorded to
other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged transaction occurs, at which time it is
reclassified to earnings. The net gain or loss recognized in earnings during 2005, 2004 and 2003,
representing the amount of the Companys hedges ineffectiveness and the component of the Companys
derivative instruments gain or loss excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, was not
significant.
At December 31, 2005, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account included
$11 million of gains, net of tax of $7 million, related to derivative instruments that hedge the
anticipated cash flows from future transactions, which are expected to be recognized in earnings
within the next twelve months. Transactions and events expected to occur over the next twelve
months that will necessitate reclassifying these derivatives gains to earnings include the sale of
finished goods inventory that includes previously hedged purchases of raw corn and the
usage of hedged natural gas. Cash flow hedges discontinued during 2005 were not material.
67
NOTE 8 Financing Arrangements
The Company had total debt outstanding of $528 million and $568 million at December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Short-term borrowings at December 31, 2005 and 2004 consist primarily of
amounts outstanding under various unsecured local country operating lines of credit.
Short-term borrowings consist of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings in various currencies (at rates of 3%-13% for
2005 and 1%-10% for 2004) |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
The Company has a $180 million Revolving Credit Agreement (the Revolving Credit Agreement),
consisting of a $150 million revolving credit facility in the US and a $30 million revolving credit
facility for the Companys wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary. The Canadian revolving credit
facility is guaranteed by Corn Products International, Inc. The revolving Credit
Agreement expires in September 2009. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving
Credit Agreement at December 31, 2005 or 2004.
On April 6, 2004, Corn Products Korea, Inc. (CPK) entered into a 3-year, $17.5 million (US)
floating rate term loan agreement to refinance certain local indebtedness. Concurrently, CPK
entered into a cross currency interest rate swap agreement that effectively converts the 3-year US
dollar floating rate term loan to a 3-year, fixed rate (5.4 percent) 20 billion Korean Won
obligation. Interest is payable quarterly in July, October, January and April.
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
8.25% senior notes, due 2007, net of discount |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
8.45% senior notes, due 2009, net of discount |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Korean loans, due 2006-2008 (at rates of 5.2% to 5.5% for 2005
and 4.7% to 5.5% for 2004) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
The Companys long-term debt matures as follows: $273 million in 2007 and $200 million in 2009.
Corn Products International, Inc. guarantees certain obligations of several of its consolidated
subsidiaries, which aggregated $29 million and $41 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
During 2005 and 2004 the Company benefited from interest rate swap agreements that effectively
converted the interest rate associated with the Companys 8.45 percent senior notes to a variable
interest rate. On August 5, 2005, the Company terminated $50 million of its $200 million
fixed to floating rate interest rate swap agreements associated with its 8.45 percent $200 million
senior notes due August 2009. The swap termination resulted in a gain of approximately $2 million,
which approximated the fair value of the swap contract. The fair value adjustment to the hedged
debt at the termination date ($2 million) is being amortized as a reduction to financing costs over
the remaining term of the underlying debt (through August 2009). At December 31, 2005, the Company had interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate associated
with $150 million of its 8.45 percent $200 million senior notes to a variable rate. The interest rate swap agreements involve the exchange of fixed rate payments (at 8.45
68
percent) for variable rate payments on $150 million of notional principal without the exchange of the underlying face amount. Under the terms of the
agreements, the Company receives fixed rate payments and makes variable rate payments based on the
six-month US dollar LIBOR rate plus a spread. The fair value of outstanding interest rate swap
agreements at December 31, 2005 and 2004 approximated $5 million and $18 million, respectively.
Interest rate differentials to be paid or received under these agreements are recognized as
adjustments to interest expense using the accrual method. The Company does not enter into interest
rate swap agreements for trading purposes.
On February 1, 2006, the Company terminated the remaining fixed to floating interest rate swap
agreements associated with the 8.45 percent senior notes. The swap termination resulted in a gain
of approximately $3 million, which approximated the fair value of the swap contract. The fair
value adjustment to the hedged debt at the termination date ($3 million) will be amortized as a
reduction to financing costs over the remaining term of the underlying debt (through August 2009).
69
NOTE 9 Leases
The Company leases rail cars, certain machinery and equipment, and office space under various
operating leases. Rental expense under operating leases was $24 million, $23 million and $25
million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Minimum lease payments due on leases existing at
December 31, 2005 are shown below:
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Minimum Lease Payment |
|
2006 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
2007 |
|
|
21 |
|
2008 |
|
|
19 |
|
2009 |
|
|
17 |
|
2010 |
|
|
12 |
|
Balance thereafter |
|
|
17 |
|
NOTE 10- Income Taxes
The components of income before income taxes and the provision for income taxes are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Income before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Outside the United States |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US federal |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
State and local |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Total current |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US federal |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
State and local |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Foreign- tax benefit of net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Total deferred |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
Total provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
70
Deferred income taxes are provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between the
financial reporting basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Significant temporary
differences at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit accruals |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Pensions |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Hedging/derivative contracts |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Foreign tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Foreign minimum tax credits |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plants and properties |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
Hedging/derivative contracts |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2005, include state net operating losses of $2
million and foreign net operating losses of $6 million. The state net operating losses expire in
various years through 2025. Foreign net operating losses of $2 million will expire in 2009 and
2010 if unused, while $4 million may be carried forward indefinitely. The foreign tax credit
carryfowards of $19 million at December 31, 2005 will expire in 2012 through 2015 if not utilized.
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires that a valuation allowance be established when
it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In
making this assessment, management considers the level of historical taxable income, scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and projected future taxable income.
The foreign tax credit carryforwards increased to $19 million at December 31, 2005 from $6 million
at December 31, 2004. At the same time, the valuation allowance relating to these foreign tax
credit carryforwards increased to $12 million at December 31, 2005 from $4 million at December 31,
2004. The valuation allowance with respect to foreign net operating losses increased to $6 million
at December 31, 2005 from $4 million at December 31, 2004.
71
A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the Companys effective tax rate follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Provision for tax at US statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Taxes related to foreign income |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
State and local taxes net |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Increase in valuation allowance foreign tax credits |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Non-conventional fuel tax credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Other items net |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
Provision at effective tax rate |
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
Provisions are made for estimated US and foreign income taxes, less credits that may be available,
on distributions from foreign subsidiaries to the extent dividends are anticipated. No provision
has been made for income taxes on approximately $578 million of undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries at December 31, 2005, as such amounts are considered permanently reinvested.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FSP FAS 109-1 Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the FSP) to provide guidance on the application of Statement 109 to
the provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) that provides tax relief to
US domestic manufacturers. The FSP states that the manufacturers deduction for qualified
production activities provided for under the Act should be accounted for as a special deduction in
accordance with Statement 109 and not as a tax rate reduction. A special deduction is accounted
for by recording the deduction in the year in which it can be taken in the Companys tax return.
The adoption of the FSP did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 provides, among other things, for a special one-time tax
deduction of 85 percent of certain foreign earnings that are repatriated, as defined in the Act.
The repatriation provision of the Act did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
NOTE 11 Benefit Plans
The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all employees in the United States and Canada, and certain employees in other foreign
countries. Plans for most salaried employees provide pay-related benefits based on years of
service. Plans for hourly employees generally provide benefits based on flat dollar amounts and
years of service. The Companys general funding policy is to make contributions to the plans in
amounts that are within the limits of deductibility under current tax regulations. Certain foreign
countries allow income tax deductions without regard to contribution levels, and the Companys
policy in those countries is to make the contribution required by the terms of the applicable plan.
Domestic plan assets consist primarily of common stock, corporate debt securities and short-term
investment funds.
Domestic salaried employees are covered by a defined benefit cash balance pension plan, which
provides benefits based on service and Company credits to the participating employees accounts of
between 3 percent and 10 percent of base salary, bonus and overtime.
The Company also provides healthcare and life insurance benefits for retired employees in the
United States and Canada. US salaried employees are provided with access to postretirement medical
insurance through Retirement Health Care Spending Accounts. US salaried employees accrue an
account during employment, which can be used after employment to purchase postretirement medical
insurance from the Company and Medigap or through Medicare HMO
policies after age 65. The accounts are credited with a flat dollar amount and indexed for inflation annually
72
during employment. The
accounts also accrue interest credits using a rate equal to a specified amount above the yield on five-year Treasury notes. Employees can use the amounts accumulated in these
accounts, including credited interest, to purchase postretirement medical insurance. Employees
become eligible for benefits when they meet minimum age and service requirements. The Company
recognizes the cost of these postretirement benefits by accruing a flat dollar amount on an annual
basis for each domestic salaried employee. The Company has the right to modify or terminate these
benefits. Healthcare benefits for retirees outside the United States and Canada are generally
covered through local government plans.
73
Pension Obligation and Funded Status The changes in pension benefit obligations and
plan assets during 2005 and 2004, as well as the funded status and the amounts recognized in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Companys pension plans at December 31, 2005
and 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Plans |
|
|
Non-US Plans |
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1 |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Actuarial loss |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Benefit obligation at December 31 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
Funded status |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Unrecognized transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Net prepaid pension asset (liability) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Plans |
|
|
Non-US Plans |
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
Accrued benefit cost |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $165 million and $148
million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Information about plan obligations and assets for plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Plans |
|
|
Non-US Plans |
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Included in the Companys pension obligation are nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for
certain key employees. All benefits provided under these plans are unfunded, and payments to plan
participants are made by the Company.
74
Components of Net Periodic Pension Benefit Cost Net pension cost consisted of the following for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Plans |
|
|
Non-US Plans |
|
(in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Net pension cost |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
The Company recognized an additional minimum pension liability at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
related to under-funded plans. In connection with the recognition of this minimum liability, at
December 31, 2005 the Company recorded a charge to other comprehensive income of $0.7 million ($0.5
million, net of income taxes of $0.2 million). At December 31, 2004 the Company recorded a charge
to other comprehensive income of $1.7 million ($0.9 million, net of income taxes of $0.8 million)
related to the recognition of the minimum pension liability. At December 31, 2003 the Company
recorded a charge to other comprehensive income of $4 million ($2.6 million, net of income taxes of
$1.4 million) pertaining to the recognition of the minimum pension liability. The minimum pension
liability will change from year to year as a result of revisions to actuarial assumptions,
experience gains or losses and settlement rate changes.
The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Companys obligations under
the pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Plans |
|
|
Non-US Plans |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Companys net periodic
benefit cost for the pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Plans |
|
|
Non-US Plans |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
The Company has assumed an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 7.25 percent for US
plans. In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption on plan assets, which
consist mainly of US equity and debt securities, management evaluated historical rates of return
achieved on plan assets and the asset allocation of the plans, input from the Companys independent
actuaries and investment consultants, and historical trends in long-term inflation rates.
Projected return estimates made by such consultants are based upon broad equity and bond indices.
The discount rate reflects a rate of return on high quality fixed income investments that match the
duration of expected benefit payments. The Company has typically used returns on long-term
corporate AA bonds as a benchmark in establishing this assumption. The discount rate is reviewed
annually.
For the Non-US plans, the Company has assumed an expected long-term rate of return on assets of
7.25 percent. The Company employs a building block approach in determining the long-term rate of
return for these plan assets. Historical markets are studied and long-term historical
relationships between equities and fixed-income are preserved, consistent with the widely accepted
capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long
run. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are
evaluated before long-term capital
75