RE:
|
Corn Products International, Inc. | |
Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 | ||
Filed February 27, 2007 | ||
File No. 1-13397 |
1. | Please expand your disclosure to address any seasonality that affects your business.
Refer to Item 101(c)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. |
1. | We are geographically diversified throughout the Northern and Southern hemispheres.
Due to the diverse locations and nature of our business, the Company does not believe that
seasonality affects our business.
However, the Company will add the disclosure presented in the paragraph below to its
discussion in the Geographic Scope and Operations section of its Item 1 Business
disclosure in our annual report on Form 10-K. |
||
In general, demand for our products is balanced throughout the year. However,
demand for sweeteners in South America is greater in the first and fourth quarters (its
summer season) while demand for sweeteners in North America is greater in the second and
third quarters. Due to the offsetting impact of these demand trends, we do not experience
material seasonal fluctuations in our business. |
2. | Please revise your disclosure to include the table that summarizes the Equity
Compensation Plan Information. Refer to Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K. |
2. | The table that summarizes the Equity Plan Compensation information was incorporated
by reference in Item 12 of the Form 10-K because Item 12 requires the registrant to
furnish the information required by Item 201 (d) of Regulation S-K. |
3. | Please expand your managements discussion and analysis of derivative financial
instruments, including hedging and non-hedging instruments, to elaborate on the nature,
extent, objective and results of these activities. Also, please disclose the types of
derivatives carried at fair value which are exchange traded, and those derivatives which
are not valued using exchange prices. Refer to FRR 61, II B. |
3. | The Company has reviewed FRR 61 ll B and will include the following additional
information in Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (MD&A) of its annual report on Form 10-K. |
||
We are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates and commodity prices. In the normal course of business, we actively manage
our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions,
authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities. The
counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions. We establish
credit limits for each counterparty. Our hedging transactions include but are not limited
to a variety of derivative financial instruments such as commodity futures contracts,
forward currency contracts and options, interest rate swap agreements and treasury lock
agreements (T-Locks). |
|||
Commodity Price Risk: |
|||
We use derivatives to manage price risk related to purchases of corn and natural gas used in
the manufacturing process. We periodically enter into futures and option contracts for a
portion of our anticipated corn and natural gas usage, generally over the following twelve
months, in order to hedge price risk associated with fluctuations in market prices. These
readily available marketable exchange-traded futures contracts are recognized at fair value
and have effectively reduced our exposure to changes in market prices for these
commodities. Unrealized gains and losses associated with marking these contracts to market
are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2006, our
accumulated other comprehensive loss account included $30 million of gains, net of tax of $19
million, related to these futures contracts. |
|||
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk: |
|||
Due to our global operations, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates. As a result, we have exposure to translational foreign exchange risk when our
foreign operation results are translated to US dollars (USD) and to transactional foreign
exchange risk when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating
unit are revalued. We primarily use foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options
to selectively hedge our foreign currency cash flow
|
4. | Please expand your managements discussion and analysis of the effects of the
adoption of FAS l23(R). Refer to SAB Topic 14.M. |
4. | The information relating to the effects of the adoption of SFAS #123R
Share-Based Payment was included in Notes 2 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. The effect of the adoption was to reduce the diluted earnings per common
share by $0.04 versus the results under APB No. 25. The 2006 full year diluted earnings
per common share for the Company were $1.63. |
||
The adoption of SFAS #123R did not impact the stock compensation philosophy of the Company.
There were: |
Ø | No modifications made to outstanding share options prior to adoption |
||
Ø | No changes in the quantity or type of instruments used in the share-based
payment program |
Ø | No changes in the terms of share-based payment programs |
5. | We note that you identify and quantify various factors that impacted the year to year
trends of your results of operations and the related financial statement line items. For
example, on page 25 of your 2006 Compared to 2005 discussion of Net Sales you state the
increase in net sales reflects volume growth of 5 percent, price/product mix improvement
of 3 percent... without discussion of the business developments or external events that
underlie these factors. Please expand your managements discussion and analysis to
explain in greater detail what gave rise to the factors that you have identified, and
indicate whether or not you expect them to have a continuing impact on your results of
operations in the future. Please refer to Commission Guidance Regarding Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. This can be
located at our website at: |
5. | The expanded disclosures have been included in our response to Comment 6. |
||
6. | We note that you have significant operations located outside the US. Please expand
your managements discussion and analysis to identify any material effects of currency
exchange rate fluctuations on reported revenues, costs, and business practice and plans by
geographic region, especially those that affect comparability. Please |
6. | In order to expand our managements discussion and analysis to include additional
information requested in Comment 5 and enhance our discussion pertaining to the effects of
currency exchange rate fluctuations, the Company will add the following additional
underlined disclosures in its annual report on Form 10-K. The Company does not believe that
there were any trends in operations or liquidity that would be apparent in the functional
currency that were not readily identified in the reporting currency. |
||
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|||
We have significant operations in North America, South America and Asia/Africa. For
most of our foreign subsidiaries, the local foreign currency is the functional currency.
Accordingly, revenues and expenses denominated in the functional currencies of these
subsidiaries are translated into US dollars at the applicable average exchange rates for
the period. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect the US dollar amounts
of our foreign subsidiaries revenues and expenses. The impact of currency exchange rate
changes, where significant, is provided below. |
|||
2006 COMPARED TO 2005 |
|||
Net Income. Net income for 2006 increased 38 percent to $124 million, or $1.63 per diluted
common share, from 2005 net income of $90 million, or $1.19 per diluted common share. |
|||
The increase in net income for 2006 from 2005 primarily reflects a 22 percent increase in
operating income driven by significantly improved results for our North American business.
Additionally, lower financing costs and currency translation attributable to stronger
foreign currencies relative to the US dollar contributed to the increase. |
|||
Net Sales. Net sales for 2006 increased to $2.62 billion from $2.36 billion in 2005, as
sales grew in each of our regions. |
% | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2006 | 2005 | Increase | Change | ||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 1,588 | $ | 1,422 | $ | 166 | 12 | % | ||||||||
South America |
670 | 603 | 67 | 11 | % | |||||||||||
Asia/Africa |
363 | 335 | 28 | 8 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,621 | $ | 2,360 | $ | 261 | 11 | % | ||||||||
Favorable | Favorable | |||||||||||||||
(Unfavorable) | (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2006 | 2005 | Variance | % Change | ||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 130 | $ | 59 | $ | 71 | 120 | % | ||||||||
South America |
84 | 101 | (17 | ) | (17 | )% | ||||||||||
Asia/Africa |
53 | 53 | - | - | % | |||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
(43 | ) | (30 | ) | (13 | ) | (43 | )% | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 224 | $ | 183 | $ | 41 | 22 | % | ||||||||
7. | Please expand your managements discussion
and analysis to include the effect your
benefit plans (e.g., pension plans, ESOPs, and other postretirement plans) have on your
results of operations. Please refer to section II.J of Current Accounting and Disclosure
Issues in the Division of Corporation Finance (revised November 30, 2006). This can be
located at our website at: |
||
http://www .sec. gov/divisions/corpfin/cfacctdisclosureissues.pdf |
7. | The Company discusses the retirement
benefits in Item 7 Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates. The net periodic pension cost was $9 million and $6 million for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The primary reason for the
increased cost was the amortization of actuarial losses. The pension cost is not
considered to be a significant expense to the Company. While we believe our benefit plan
disclosures were adequate, the Company will supplement its disclosures to include the
following additional underlined information in its annual report on Form 10-K. |
||
We sponsor non-contributory defined benefit plans covering substantially all employees in
the United States and Canada, and certain employees in other foreign countries. We also
provide healthcare and life insurance benefits for retired employees in the United States
and Canada. The net periodic pension cost was $9 million and $6 million for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The reason for the increase was primarily
due to the amortization of actuarial losses. The Company estimates that net periodic
pension expense for 2007 will include approximately $2 million relating to the amortization
of its accumulated actuarial loss included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at
December 31, 2006. In order to measure the expense and obligations associated with
these retirement benefits, our management must make a variety of estimates and assumptions,
including discount rates used to value certain liabilities, expected return on plan assets
set aside to fund these costs, rate of compensation increase, employee turnover rates,
retirement rates, mortality rates, and other factors. These estimates and assumptions are
based on our historical experience, along with our knowledge and understanding of current
facts, trends and circumstances. We use third-party specialists to assist management in
evaluating our assumptions and estimates, as well as to appropriately measure the costs and
obligations associated with our retirement benefit plans. Had we used different estimates
and assumptions with respect to these plans, our retirement benefit obligations and related
expense could vary from |
8. | We noted successive annual increases in your valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets. Please expand your managements discussion and analysis to include the
significant factors considered and related assumptions resulting in the changes in the
valuation allowance. Please expand your disclosure to address, by region or jurisdiction,
the factors that support the allowance despite your history of earning pretax income, to
the extent this additional information can provide insight with respect to your particular
circumstances. |
8. | While the Company provided information relating to the valuation allowance in Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company will include the following additional
information in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section of its MD&A to be
included in its annual report on Form 10-K.
|
9. | Please expand your disclosures to include quantitative and qualitative disclosures of
foreign currency exchange rate risk exposures, as required by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.
Quantitative disclosures should conform to one of the three disclosure alternatives
provided by paragraph (a) of Item 305. |
9. | The Company will include the following additional disclosure in Item 7A of its annual
report on Form 10-K. |
10. | Please expand your disclosure in the financial statements or notes to financial
statements to include both the amount of income taxes for the period allocated to
translation adjustments, and the beginning balances of cumulative translation adjustments
as part of your disclosure of the changes in the components of accumulated other
comprehensive income/loss. Refer to paragraph 31 of FAS 52. |
10. | While much of the requested information can be found in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, in order to enhance the presentation of the disclosure the Company
will include the following table in its Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
its annual report on Form 10-K that sets forth pertinent information with respect to
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Company does not tax effect the currency
translation adjustment because the undistributed earnings of its foreign operations are
considered to be permanently reinvested. |
Deferred | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
Currency | Gain/(Loss) | Pension | Other | |||||||||||||
Translation | on Hedging | Liability | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | Adjustment | Activities | Adjustment | Income/(Loss) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
$ | (349 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (343 | ) | |||||
Losses on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of
$15 |
(26 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||
Amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified to
earnings, net of income tax effect of $5 |
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
57 | 57 | ||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability MPL, net of income tax effect |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
(292 | ) | (25 | ) | (4 | ) | (321 | ) | ||||||||
Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $7 |
12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to
earnings, net of income tax effect of $14 |
24 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
35 | 35 | ||||||||||||||
MPL, net of income tax effect |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
(257 | ) | 11 | (5 | ) | (251 | ) | |||||||||
Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $8 |
12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to
earnings, net of income tax effect of $2 |
5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
43 | 43 | ||||||||||||||
Adjustment to MPL prior to adoption of SFAS No. 158, |
||||||||||||||||
net of income tax effect of $1 |
2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Adoption of SFAS No. 158, net of income tax effect of $18 |
(34 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
$ | (214 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | (223 | ) | |||||
11. | Please expand your disclosure related to equity method investments to include disclosures
prescribed by paragraph 20 of APB 18, or provide us additional information as to why you
believe disclosure is not applicable. |
11. | At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had one investment that was
accounted for under the equity method. The investment was $28 million at December 31, 2006
and $5 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in the investment is discussed in
paragraph 2 of Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. During 2007, the Company
acquired additional shares in this company increasing its ownership to 100 percent and began
consolidating the subsidiary in its Consolidated Financial Statements. At the present time,
the Company has no investments accounted for under the equity method. In the future, if
circumstances change, the investment disclosures in Note 2 will include the information
prescribed in Paragraph 20 of APB #18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in
Common Stock. |
12. | Please expand your disclosure of revenue recognition to address when and how the
criteria in SAB Topic 13.A.1 are generally satisfied, including managements significant
assumptions therein. |
12. | The Company generally sells its products directly to manufacturers and distributors.
We sell primarily to well established companies and title normally passes FOB the Companys
plant. We do not provide any services as part of the sale of our products. The Company has
reviewed the criteria for revenue recognition in SAB Topic 13.A.1 and while we believe that
the disclosure was adequate, the Company will include the following additional underlined
disclosure in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements to be included in its annual
report on Form 10-K. |
||
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes operating revenues at the time title to the
goods and all risks of ownership transfer to the customers. This transfer is
considered complete when a sales agreement is in place, delivery has occurred, pricing is
fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. In the case of |
13. | We note the feature of your redeemable common stock allows the holder to put the stock to
the company at a value other than fair value. Please explain why your earnings per share
disclosure has not been prepared under the two-class method to attribute changes in the
redemption value to the appropriate class of common stock. Refer to paragraph 19 of EITF
Topic D-98 and paragraph 60(b) of FAS 128. |
13. | The Company has reviewed paragraph 19 of EITF Topic D-98 and paragraph 60 (b) of FAS 128.
We believe that the 20 trading day average approximates the fair value of the stock and
therefore, the two class method of calculating earnings per share is not applicable. |
||
The Company has an agreement with certain common stockholders (the holder) stemming from an
acquisition in 1998 relating to shares of the Companys common stock, that provides the
holder with the right to require the Company to repurchase those common shares for cash at
a price equal to the average of the closing per share market price of the Companys common
stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date that the holder exercises the
put option. The agreement was negotiated between the parties and the 20 trading day
average was evaluated to be a fair value strike price for the Company stock. There have
been no changes or modifications to the agreement since the issuance date. The original
amount of shares issued relating to this agreement were 3,827,000 shares (adjusted for a 2
for 1 stock split on January 25, 2005). As of December 31, 2006, the holder had sold 2.6
million shares in the open market, with no shares being put to the Company. The total
amount of common shares outstanding (including 1,227,000 redeemable shares) at December 31,
2006 was approximately 74.3 million shares. Furthermore, in 2007 the holder sold an
additional 727,000 shares in the open market leaving 500,000 shares currently subject to
the agreement. At December 31, 2006, the 20 trading day average price was $35.86, while
the closing price was $34.54. At December 31, 2005, the 20 trading day average price was
$23.63 while the closing price was $23.89. We therefore believe that the 20 trading day
average price approximated fair value at December 31, 2006 and 2005. |
14. | Please revise your disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments in order to
present the fair value of debt in a format that presents the information alongside, or in
substantially the same location within your document as, the related carrying amount of debt
so as to clarify whether the fair value and carrying amount represent assets or liabilities
and how the carrying amounts relate to what is reported in the statement of financial
position. Refer to paragraph 10 of FAS 107. |
14. | The Company will include the table below that presents the carrying amounts and fair
values of its long-term debt in its Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of its
annual report on Form 10-K. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt is estimated
based on quotations of major securities dealers who are market makers in the securities. |
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | ||||||||||||
amount | value | amount | value | |||||||||||||
8.25% senior notes, due 2007 |
$ | 255 | $ | 259 | $ | 254 | $ | 266 | ||||||||
8.45% senior notes, due 2009 |
199 | 213 | 199 | 219 | ||||||||||||
Mexican term loan, due 2008 |
17 | 17 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Canadian revolving credit facility, due 2011 |
9 | 9 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Korean loans, due 2007 and 2006 |
18 | 18 | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
$ | 498 | $ | 516 | $ | 481 | $ | 513 | ||||||||
Less: current maturities of long-term debt |
(18 | ) | (18 | ) | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 480 | $ | 498 | $ | 471 | $ | 503 | ||||||||
15. | Please expand your disclosure of the fair values of financial instruments to include
derivative instruments and investments carried at cost, or explain why you believe
disclosure is not applicable. Refer to paragraphs 3 and 7 of FAS 107. |
15. | The Companys wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary has a $6 million investment in a Canadian
company representing approximately 9 percent of the equity ownership of that company. We do
not deem this investment to be material and therefore no disclosure is required. However,
the Company will include the following additional underlined information in the first and
second paragraphs of its Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding Financial
Instruments, Derivatives and Hedging Activities in its annual report on Form 10-K. |
||
Fair value of financial instruments: |
|||
The carrying value of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
short-term borrowings approximate fair values. Futures contracts, which are
designated as hedges of specific volumes of commodities are recognized at fair value.
Foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options hedge transactional foreign exchange
risk related to assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional
currency and are recognized at fair value. The Companys treasury lock agreements, which
lock the benchmark rate for an anticipated fixed rate borrowing, are recognized at fair
value. The fair |
16. | Please expand your disclosure in the financial statements or notes to financial
statements to include the beginning balances of accumulated derivative gains/losses as part
of your disclosure of the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive
income/loss. Refer to paragraph 47 of FAS 133. |
16. | Please see our response to
Comment 10. We will provide this disclosure in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements to
be included in our annual report on Form 10-K. |
17. | Please explain why the changes in the carrying amount of redeemable common stock have
been recorded to additional paid-in capital and not to retained earnings. Refer to
paragraph 19 of EITF Topic D-98. |
17. | As noted in the response to Comment 13, the Company believes that the 20 trading day
average price for the redeemable common stock approximates fair value. The Company does
not believe that the redeemable common shareholders have received, in substance, a
distribution or dividend that differs from what its other common shareholders are entitled
to. Therefore, the Company does not believe that the resulting increases or decreases in
the carrying amount of the redeemable common stock should be treated in the same manner as
dividends on nonredeemable stock. Accordingly, the Company believes that the fair value
adjustments to its redeemable common stock are appropriately made against additional
paid-in capital. |
18. | We note that the identification of the report in paragraph 1 of the certifications also
includes the period title annual. In future filings, the identification of the period of
the report should be removed so as not to specify or qualify the period for which the report
has been certified. This comment also applies to Exhibit 31.2. |
18. | Exhibit 31 in Item 601 of Regulation S-K requires the certifications to state: I
have reviewed this [specify report] of [identify registrant]. We believe that
identifying the report as an annual report on Form 10-K is an appropriate response to
the requirement to specify the report with respect to which the certification relates
since it is in fact an annual report pursuant to Section 13 of the Exchange and not a
transition report pursuant to that section. |
| it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings; |
||
| staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the filings
reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect
to the filing; and |
||
| the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |